Skip to main content

The worst teams are getting worse

So baseball's regular season has ended ... at lightning speed from my perspective. I don't remember a season moving so fast, but I'm sure it's just another example of time speeding up as you age.
 
A bunch of teams are going to the playoffs (I remember when it was just four) and I'll get to that eventually. But right now I want to address a team that didn't reach the playoffs. In fact, it finished as far away from the playoffs as possible.
 

The Rockies completed the season 43-119. That's a .265 winning percentage. That's pathetic. That's a pathetic team.
 

It may not seem that shocking though because there was a team just last year that was even worse. The 2024 White Sox finished 41-121 for a .253 percentage.
 
It looks like I wrote that post about the worst teams since I became a fan a little too early. Since I wrote that two years ago, two teams went and topped (bottomed?) any of the other lousy teams that I had previously experienced in the 50 years I've been a fan.
 
Here now are the worst teams since I became a fan:
 
1. Chicago White Sox, 2024, .253
2. Colorado Rockies, 2025, .265
2. Detroit Tigers, 2003, .265
4. Baltimore Orioles, 2018, .290
5. Detroit Tigers, 2019, .292
6. Oakland Athletics, 2023, .309
7. Arizona Diamondbacks, 2004, .315
7. Houston Astros, 2013, .315
9. Arizona Diamondbacks, 2021, .321
9. Baltimore Orioles, 2021, .321
 
The White Sox and Rockies have rocketed to the bottom. Also note that eight of the 10 teams played within the last seven years. I've been a fan since 1975 yet I didn't experience the worst teams I've ever seen until 45 years into watching baseball. (The only team in the "same ballpark" of badness from my time as a youngster -- the 1979 Blue Jays -- fell out of the bottom 10 with this update).
 
We're truly in a new era of Awful Teams. Let's see how the current terrible teams compare with the all-time worst in the modern era:
 
1. Philadelphia Athletics, 1916, .235
2. Boston Braves, 1935, .248
3. New York Mets, 1962, .250
4. Washington Senators, 1904, .252
5. Chicago White Sox, 2024, .253
6. Philadelphia Athletics, 1919, .257
7. Detroit Tigers, 2003, .265
7. Colorado Rockies, 2025, .265
9. Pittsburgh Pirates, 1952, .273
10. Washington Senators, 1909, .276
 
With the exception of the 2003 Tigers, that list of worst records had stood intact for half a century. I remember reading repeatedly about the 1962 Mets and the 1952 Pirates as the worst of all-time (you still hear about the '62 Mets, with good reason). Now two teams have placed themselves right with those other two that were joked about for decades. And they did it within two years. But will these two teams' ineptness last in lore for 50 more years?
 
I do not believe in a salary cap and I wish the commissioner would stop bringing it up because he's going to walk everyone right into a strike. But there should definitely be a salary floor. Or -- here's an idea -- kick out any owner who isn't interesting in seeing his team win, which is what major league baseball should be all about.

Comments

Doc Samson said…
I’m a White Sox fan. I was fortunate enough to attend Game 2 of 2005 The World Series when Scott Podsednik hit a walk off home run for the White Sox. It seemed like a dream. Maybe it was considering how bad the team is now.
I think your Detroit, as tied for #2, has a typo??? 2003, it should be in that first list? The Rockies are a Joke. So are the White Sox and the divide between the elite, the good, the mediocre, and the terrible has never been bigger. MLB needs to CONTRACT; not expand. Too many AAAA and AAA and AA players at the Major League level.

I believe there should be a salary floor too and the loss of home games and draft picks for violations. Also, penalize teams by not allowing them to trade AWAY players.
Shlabotnik said…
Relegation and promotion!!!!! (Yeah, it'll never happen, but it's a fun concept anyway)
John Bateman said…
There seems to be no easy answer. Green Bay would not exist if the NFL did not pool their tv money (Heck the Bills would probably have a hard time surviving.)

I remember reading how the players and sport-writers used to hang out in the bar after the games in the 1910s and 1920s, The aggregate difference between what a player made and what a sports writer made back then was a few thousand dollars today it is millions.

The reasons it is millions is because the larger markets have more income to pay the better players and the smaller markets have less and get the cheaper and lesser players. I don't how to change that - maybe expand the playoffs - in short series maybe anthing can happen.

Old Cards said…
The key word is 'owner'. They own the team allowing them to make whatever decisions they want for the entity they own. If they can keep their business going and not win, then that is their prerogative.
bryan was here said…
I don't believe baseball needs a salary cap, but definitely a floor. I would force cheapskate owners like the Pirates and Athletics, and to a lesser degree Cleveland, to actually put a competitive team on the field and not run out a bunch of Triple A and "Quad A" guys.
Old Cards said…
In America, we have free enterprise. How do you force owners of businesses to spend money? Who does the forcing?
night owl said…
This is the problem: owners who look at an MLB team as just another business. Fans need to boycott their asses right out of the league.
Jamie Meyers said…
The ugly truth is that it's all a business. If those awful Rockies and White Sox teams still made money then the owners are probably ok with it. What happened with the Twins at the deadline is just crappy. NO says boycott the hell out of them and I couldn't agree more. I've not attended a major league game in years and even the minors are not that interesting to me any longer. Lots of people are paying $25 to park their cards, $12 for a beer and $8 for a hot dog, but not me.
Matt said…
Congrats to the White Sox for a 19-win improvement over last year!
Anonymous said…
To Old Cards: Major League Baseball is a specialized business in which revenue is shared and the individual teams operate as a collective. Unlike, say plumbing companies, that operate within a particular industry but don't share revenue. This means that the owner of a small plumbing company doesn't get a share of the revenue generated by a larger plumbing company. And if a plumbing company underpays employees, the employees will leave and the company will go out of business. But in baseball, an owner such as the owner of the Pirates receives money that his "company" did not generate so he can hire cheaper players and not go out of business.
Old Cards said…
Thanks! Don't care for the business model. Sounds kind of like socialism. Not even sure why I jumped in the fray. I hardly ever watch baseball now. I care more about the cards than the game itself.
Fuji said…
As an A's fan, I'm all about a "salary floor". And I'm doing my best to boycott making any purchases that will line the Mr. Fisher's pockets.
Nick Vossbrink said…
Now do their runs-scored differentials. Rockies finished like 33% worse than the 1962 Mets here.