data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20607/206072ffd4d479c2fcd4a79af1dd1e9129112969" alt=""
That someone turned out to be Ben of Cardboard Icons, who is a noted Red Sox fan and a familiar trade partner. I dropped his card in the mail on Saturday, but I have already received the cards he sent me. And we're going to have a look.
Now, keep in mind not all of these cards were sent in exchange for the relic. A bunch were Dodgers that Ben had set aside already. And I sent him some other Red Sox besides the relic (I actually need to send him a few more). The two cards that sold me on the trade are featured first, then others will follow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f7da/5f7da275db663d309abc097383a92ea160dc10ad" alt=""_NEW.jpg)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f448b/f448bca5e7ea9eacec1f2b6971d8e865152bead5" alt=""_NEW.jpg)
... What? That's not Zach Kindred? It's Tim Hamulack? Well, look at his signature, it looks like it could be Zach Kindred to me. You'd think a guy like Hamulack, who is an on-the-fringe major leaguer, would want people to know who he was when he signed his name. But he also probably had to sign 742 stickers. So there's that.
OK, onto the random Dodgers that I received.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28f10/28f10b07a03065f885eaa7d6fa2ae684f0596da8" alt=""_NEW.jpg)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53192/531928feacb86b9e60ea0870a82758d1117e0807" alt=""
Next up are a bunch of vintage Dodgers. I will refrain from commenting until the end:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61591/61591b233a4819f64494cbd507c834331919858c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ff16/2ff16852756bfefd596548f07536def151503a5a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/250c2/250c2f864b7092208f83a81e4f4b3aa81e30c165" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43e2d/43e2d9c91dfa775d14a959658b001147dd04b9b2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b29af/b29af6abb09356906f930032800488451551c814" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55082/55082ea8f79cc88d71fd511cf27290c736b1f096" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/442a8/442a80d796166fe19f879ad5bcd6dfaef12ef627" alt=""
- 1. Almost all of these cards are for my team binders, as I either have the entire set or most of the set.
- 2. The Ron Cey card is one of my favorites. He looks like he's either going to mortally wound the pitcher or that he really hates his bat and is trying to choke it. Also, the bat is so yellow that it looks like a wiffle bat. And, this is one of the very few Cey cards in which he's not wearing a hat.
- 3. The 1970 Fred Norman card is the first 1970 Topps card I ever owned. Guess which one was the second one I owned? Yup, Ted Sizemore. I don't know how you bloggers do things like this. It's like you bugged my bedroom when I was 11 years old. And that's downright creepy.
- 4. I have received this 1967 Phil Regan cards in trades twice. In fact, I just traded one of them away. If I hadn't, I'd have three cards of Regan. Having "triples" of a 1967 card blows my mind.
After all of that vintage, you're probably ready for a more modern card.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/961b8/961b83ca00fcc7c013b6d7dd6cc0f4549bd43ca6" alt=""_NEW.jpg)
Many thanks for the cards, Ben. Enjoy the triple-swatch-fest card.
Comments
i'll write more later, typing w/ one hand. holding my daughter.
word verification: faild. everyone's a critic.