Skip to main content

The continuing case of the disappearing umpire

OK, class, when we last left off we were talking about Manny Ramirez and the case of the disappearing umpire.

Remember the 2008 Topps Stadium Club card? Manny Ramirez was photoshopped into a Dodgers uniform and the entire stadium was transformed into Dodger Stadium (it's actually Fenway Park). And the poor umpire was erased from the photo altogether, because of licensing issues.

And you remember why that was wrong, right? In photojournalism circles this is a No.1 no-no. A good way to earn your pink slip. But even for a card company, it's bad news because it's deceptive. And we all know that card companies have trust issues when it comes to their customer base these days. (Not to mention, when have you ever seen a photo of a hitter at the plate during a game without the umpire in the shot?)

All right, for those of you who remember all that, I apologize for the rehash. That was for the benefit of the rest of the class that may be a little, um, slow, or were in the principal's office that day.

Now, we'll get everyone up to date with a 2009 Bowman card of Manny Ramirez, sent to me by Jeff at Card Junkie:

I'm showing it nice and big so you can take in the photo. It's a nice shot, and unlike the Stadium Club card, Ramirez appears to be wearing an actual Dodger uniform. (EDIT: But I have no idea where it was played. Manny is in a home uniform, the catcher is in a road uniform, but that does not look like Dodger Stadium).

But look at Ramirez's feet. Now look to the right of Ramirez's feet. See the umpire's foot and a small part of his leg? OK, now pan up a little bit. Where is the rest of the umpire? He's not there is he?

My goodness, Topps rubbed out the umpire but left his leg to send a message!!!!! You don't want to mess with these Topps guys. They're bad news.

Actually, what happened here appears to be another sloppy photo-tinkering performance. Thanks to the incomplete erasing job, it looks as if Ramirez is growing a third foot out of his leg (a PED side-effect, perhaps?) The ump is gone again because of licensing issues, but they forget to get rid of the foot! Can the umpire sue because Topps used his foot without permission? Hmmmm.

Jeff also sent a few other Bowman Dodgers. No funny business going on in these cards.

The awe-inspiring Matt Kemp. He still strikes out too much, but he's valuable in the lineup, and he's made some great outfield plays this season.

My man Clayton Kershaw. I like the signature. Kershaw's doing his part in a patchwork Dodgers rotation. I guess he was prepared to relieve Monday night if Hiroki Kuroda couldn't go five in his return to the rotation. I was relieved they didn't have to use Kershaw.

Tonight's starter, Chad Billingsley. Boy, Bowman didn't mess around with which players to pick with the non-prospects did they? You couldn't find four finer Dodgers. Billingsley has fallen off a little since his great start, but part of that is because he hasn't gotten a lot of run support.

Jeff, thanks for the cards, especially the very entertaining Ramirez card. I didn't even notice the disappearing umpire when you showed it on your video.


  1. Holy crap! How did I miss that? I thought there was something fishy about that photo!

  2. This is nothing new tho.. Topps has been changing the hats/uniforms of players that got traded for a LONG time - at least since the 70's, possibly earlier.. They just have it easier now with computers and photoshop, lol..

    That is sketchy with the ump removed mid-swing tho.. It's seems funny kinda like a joke too, cuz Manny is known for playing by his own rules - so it's like he's so bad, he hits without an ump, hahah.

  3. Oh, I know, Billy. I'm aware of all the airbrushing and photoshopping, although the Stadium Club card was taking it to a new level.

    My thing with this Bowman card is they forgot to erase the ump's foot. So now they have this phantom foot just sitting there on the card. It's bizarre.

  4. JESUS FUCKING CHRIST!!!!!!!!!!!

    Sorry, that was my actual gut response to your discovery. AMAZING.

  5. Manny is wearing home whites and Carlos Ruiz is wearing road greys. Too many Dodgers fans behind home plate to be in Philly.

  6. Wow, this card is even more screwed up than I thought. You're right about the jerseys (I edited the post). But that does not resemble any Dodger Stadium that I know. Did they photoshop the wall?

  7. I don't think the background is another part of Dodger stadium, not behind home plate. After all, the fans back there would be obscured by the real ump. Topps must have photoshopped that background in from somewhere else.

    That is a really cool discovery you made.

  8. Yeah, Bo, I think you're right. I was going to mention that in the last comment -- the background is from another photo entirely.

  9. To me, it's impossible that this was an accident. I wonder why Bowman chose to make the mistake on a star card instead of a lesser-known player. I suppose it's a time-tested method, though, and errors on star cards generate more buzz.

    I haven't collected recent cards at card companies still issue corrected versions of error cards like this?

  10. That is fantastic! I doubt I ever would have noticed that.


  11. Yeah, Andy, it's no accident (although not sure about the leftover ump leg). The corrected error card is kind of a thing of the past, as far as I know.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Not done with baseball but so done with 2019 baseball cards

I stayed true to my vow to avoid viewing most of the League Championship Series. After the NLDS debacle, my heart wasn't in another round of baseball.

I did sit down for a little bit of Game 4 of the Nats-Cards and, of course, I had to watch the highlights of Game 6 of the Astros-Yankees.

But that was about it, and I placed a "TBD" on the World Series, too. "We'll see how I feel," I said.

Well, the World Series starts tomorrow and I fully plan to watch it -- at least the portions that do not air when I am at work. I've decided that I'm just not done with baseball yet. The Astros-Nationals appeals to me a bit just because of all the fantastic starting pitching matchups. So, baseball, you're off the hook. I'll still watch you.

Your trading card sets, however ...

That's another matter.

I'm finished with buying 2019 cards. I knew that a few weeks ago, probably a few months ago. But it hit home when I was opening the five loose packs of …

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:

 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…