Skip to main content

This just isn't right

So, I was wandering through the blogs this afternoon as is my custom. It's a happy little time, devoid of worries or aggravations. It is a time when the sun always shines, purple bunnies hop through the meadow behind my backyard, and beautiful music emanates from a perfect blue sky.

And then I saw THIS ...

WHA??? JACKIE? IN A GIANTS UNIFORM?????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



It is my understanding that this monstrosity is one of the cards created for release at the National this summer. Apparently, according to the newsletter released today, they "wondered, what would Jackie have looked like in a Giants uniform and the 2009 National (Topps) VIP card of Jackie Robinson answers that question."

Well, isn't that lovely. Harmless musing. Mere wondering. How delightful.

Should I know about any other horrifying non-existent scenarios that you are scheming to bring to reality under the guise of mere wondering? Plan on burning every little kid's stuffed animals? Littering the highway with thumb tacks? Harnessing the power of the sun for evil? Shooting the purple bunnies hopping through the meadow?

Because if you're putting Jackie in a Giants uniform, WHICH HE NEVER WORE, then there is no stopping you from foisting other horrors on to the collecting public.

The story goes that Jackie Robinson refused to go to the Giants after he was traded to the team in 1956. I choose to believe that. But even if it's not true, he was never a Giant. And, for the record, I have NEVER wondered what he would have looked like in a Giant uniform. But thanks to The National, I'm forced to consider the possibility.

My eyes. My poor, poor eyes.

Might as well do what I would have done when I was a boy:

There. I feel somewhat better. I'm sorry they did this to you Jackie. Please forgive them.


  1. ya might as well put Hank in a Brewers uni, or Murph in a Rockies jersey, or.. or...

    I could just cry....

  2. or tony gwynn in a dodgers uniform

  3. I always wondered what Mickey Mantle in a Seattle Pilots on a 1970 Topps card would look like?

  4. Horrible. I am picturing someone like Stan Musial wearing a Mets uniform on a Topps faux-retro card or something.

  5. That '59 Robinson card for you reminds me of one of my favorite sayings:

    Once you see something, you can never unsee it.

  6. "...then there is no stopping you from foisting other horrors on to the collecting public."

    Like Jackie Robinson in a Yankees uniform!

  7. What is even worse about this card, is there were no New York Giants in 1959.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Not done with baseball but so done with 2019 baseball cards

I stayed true to my vow to avoid viewing most of the League Championship Series. After the NLDS debacle, my heart wasn't in another round of baseball.

I did sit down for a little bit of Game 4 of the Nats-Cards and, of course, I had to watch the highlights of Game 6 of the Astros-Yankees.

But that was about it, and I placed a "TBD" on the World Series, too. "We'll see how I feel," I said.

Well, the World Series starts tomorrow and I fully plan to watch it -- at least the portions that do not air when I am at work. I've decided that I'm just not done with baseball yet. The Astros-Nationals appeals to me a bit just because of all the fantastic starting pitching matchups. So, baseball, you're off the hook. I'll still watch you.

Your trading card sets, however ...

That's another matter.

I'm finished with buying 2019 cards. I knew that a few weeks ago, probably a few months ago. But it hit home when I was opening the five loose packs of …

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:

 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…