Skip to main content

It's Gordon and that's all

The revamped Veterans Committee looks a lot like the old Veterans Committee, judging by the announcement this afternoon of who was selected to the Baseball Hall of Fame.

Only Joe Gordon, a World War II-era second baseman for the Yankees and Indians, was elected to the Hall. Gordon was part of the group of pre-1943 players considered by one committee. Meanwhile, the other committee, asked to select from 1943-present players, picked no one. AGAIN.

I don't understand how this is possible unless people on the committee have their own agendas. Either multiple committee members are pushing their own individual player, or maybe a number of committee members don't even want anyone in the Hall, and that's their agenda. I really thought with this change in the process that someone from the post-1943 group was going to get in.

I realize it should be difficult to get into the Hall. But I think it's getting too difficult. Committee members need to start coming to some sort of compromise, or the Hall should just boot them all and think of a new way to vote in players.

From the pre-1943 group, I would've liked to see Mickey Vernon get in. But I'm not very good at judging whether players from 60 years ago deserve to be in the Hall. It was such a long time ago. Gordon appears to be deserving. That period of time where the talent was watered down because of the war makes me wonder a little. But his numbers look good.

As for the numbers for Ron Santo, Gil Hodges, Dick Allen, Jim Kaat, Luis Tiant, Maury Wills, Vada Pinson, Tony Oliva, Joe Torre and Al Oliver, they look good, too. Santo, Hodges, Torre and Wills definitely belong in the Hall. Probably a couple others should be there, too.

Let the outrage begin ...

Comments

Rob- AKA "VOTC" said…
It is a freaking crime santo isn't in. Joe Morgan is a piece of garbage.
dayf said…
*seethes with burning hate*

STUPID RACKIN FRACKIN FILTH FLARN FILTH MOTHERSCRATCHERS!!!

NOTAFINGA!!!!!!!!
Dave said…
I don't mind that the Veterans Committee hasn't been voting in many players. Truthfully, if a player wasn't good enough to be voted in by the writers, he's probably not a Hall of Famer anyway. Ron Santo is a definite exception, and he should get in someday soon. Joe Torre will go in someday too - but more for what he did as a manager than as a player. Other than that, I'm glad that the rest are not getting into the Hall.
madding said…
Joe Gordon, as I just found out today, played baseball at the University of Oregon. The Ducks are restarting their baseball program next year for the first time since the early 80s, which I think is pretty cool.

Just wanted an excuse to say... Go Ducks!
gritz76 said…
Last time Santo missed by 5 votes. This time he missed by 9. Ryno should of added a vote so that means he actually lost 5 votes, WTF! I used to dream of the day I finally got to visit the Hall of Fame but right now I could give a damn if I ever get there.
MMayes said…
This is a backlash to too many "cronies" getting into the HOF too easily and diluting it. It was decided to let the HOFers themselves vote and if they thought someone was deserving, so be it.

Santo was a good player for a long time, but why didn't the writers vote him in? He was certainly a popular player in a major media market. I started following baseball in 1971, so I didn't get in on his best years, but in the early 70's when someone talked about the Cubs it was (definitely in this order) 1. Ferguson Jenkins, 2. Billy Williams and 3. Ron Santo. Santo has developed a following doing the radio games and I think that's a lot of the angst over his failure to join the HOF.

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:



1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…

Eighties

I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…