Skip to main content

You can't tell me this wasn't done on purpose

It's not about being first. It's about having something to say.

At least that's what I kept telling myself the more I scrolled through Archives posts today. (Thirteen today alone, so far).

Even before I bought a rack pack and a loose pack of this stuff, I wondered what the hell I was going to say about it. I basically already said my thoughts before I had even touched any of the cards. And after opening these, nothing has changed.

It's Lineage 2.0. And it's Fan Favorites minus 20.0.

I've seen a wide range of opinions on these cards and I'm more in the "what's the big deal" camp. I can't believe people are praising the wrapper. It's a wrapper. Besides, in the '80s I was sick to death of seeing the baseball with the streak on the front. "WILL YOU PLEASE CHANGE YOUR WRAPPER TO SOMETHING OTHER THAN A GIANT BASEBALL GLOWING LIKE THE SUN????" I believe were my thoughts back then.

Since I'm so (*yawn*) about this product, my only objective with buying this -- other than getting a lame post out of it -- was finding a Dodger or two.

And I failed miserably.

Not only did I not get one Dodger, I got FOUR Giants.


This is not funny anymore. I can't tell you how many posts I've written in which I've opened a product for the first time and nothing but Giants came out.

This is no coincidence. Someone is doing this on purpose. I don't know how. It's the most evil, ingenious plot that man has ever devised. But something devious is definitely going on.

This time it was even worse. I got one short-print in the rack pack. And I got one insert in the loose pack. Both would be considered the prizes of each pack, although it's not like I'm pulling autographs out of the thing.

BOTH were Giants.

Am I being paranoid? Am I being overdramatic? Am I blowing off steam after a week of crap?

I don't know. But I am pissed.

What's more, I just sealed up a package destined for the only Giants card collector I know. So I'm stuck with these distasteful cards for a good while because there ARE NO OTHER GIANTS FANS WHO COLLECT CARDS.

NOBODY LIKES THE GIANTS, TOPPS!! NOBODY! Stop making Giants cards!!!!!!

Now, I know because I wrote that, someone is going to write in the comments, "I'm a Giants fan. You've got a great pack there."

Terrific. Thanks for emerging out of the woodwork. Where've you been for four years?

If you want the Giants cards, you better bring it -- and I mean Dodgers from Archive, shortprint Dodgers from Archive in one particular case. Otherwise, I'm burning these cards on my front lawn at midnight.

It is in this foam-mouthed frame of mind that you will see the cards from the rack pack.

Prepare for bitter commentary.

#42 - Ardolis Chapman, Reds

Guys with double earrings make me wonder why I'm still collecting cards of today's ballplayers.

#80 - Troy Tulowitzki, Rockies

Remember the days when I used to complain about pulling more Carlos Lee cards than anyone else? Troy Tulowitzki has long since passed the Lee plague. If I pull an insert, 75 percent of the time it's a Tulowitzki.

And is Tulo playing for the state penitentiary team?

#125 - David Freese, Cardinals

I am so rooting against a repeat this year.

#175 - Justin Morneau, Twins

OK, let's stop to talk about the make-up of the cards. As a number of bloggers (re: about 50,000) have said, there is no gloss on these cards. It's like a matte finish. That's kind of nice. The cards are still much too thin, but the finish takes your mind off of that. So there's a happy thought.

Meanwhile, others have mentioned that there is no foil. Can you imagine if there was foil on these designs? That would be a crime against nature (and I've seen the refractor versions of these cards to know that a crime is exactly what it is).

OK, when I was opening this pack, there was a moment in which I thought to myself, "Gee, wouldn't it be great if I pulled two Diamondback cards in a row? They're such a plucky, lovable team of rapscallions."

#182 - Ian Kennedy, Diamondbacks

#23 - Chris Young, Diamondbacks

All my dreams have come true. And by "dreams" I mean seeing what it would look like to have a too-long team nickname squashed into a 1984 Topps design.

#72 - Ian Kinsler, Rangers

I know everyone is thinking it, but they're not saying it. This is merely a representation of 1971 Topps, not a duplication. The font for the team name is not the same, probably because they have to squeeze in that "TM".

#67 - Justin Verlander, Tigers

Best card in the two packs. And I don't follow the Tigers at all. That's how tremendous these packs were.

#118 - Desmond Jennings, Rays

Topps used the 1980 Topps Pirates color scheme for this Rays card, as the Rays weren't around in '80. Not sure why it chose the Pirates.

#169 - Michael Morse, Nationals

I think the world would be a happier place without Nationals cards.

Think about it.

OK, this is where I blew my stack:

#209 - Will Clark, Giants (SP)

Out of all the short-prints I could have pulled, it had to be this one. I would've rather pulled whatever 10 Yankees that are listed as short-prints.

I am baffled by the adulation for Clark on the blogs. He was annoying as hell. I guess that's what happens when kids from the '80s grow up. We get movies based on toys and board games and love for shrill-sounding, black-and-orange losers.

I can't wait to get this card out of my sight. By trade or by open flame.

#31 - Joe Morgan, Reds

Not getting any better.

#81 - Adrian Beltre, Rangers

Joe Madden makes a cameo.

#133 - Mark Trumbo, Angels

Last card.

After finishing off that rack pack, I couldn't wait to open the loose pack as I figured it had to be an improvement.

What I got was 3 Giants out of the 8 cards.

You're not seeing any of the cards.

OK, here's one.

Topps considers this sticker a "card," by the way.

And I know what you're saying: "Awesome. It's a Willie Mays sticker!"

And my response is, "yeah, yeah, what Dodger are you going to trade to me for it?"

I'm probably not going to buy any more of this than I've bought of Gypsy Queen or Bowman. I do like it better than those two products, but it's just not that well-executed, and even though it looks better than Lineage, there are no '75 minis to distract myself from the other stuff.

So, gee, Night Owl, you're awfully cranky today about these cards. Are they really THAT bad? Nobody is forcing you to buy them, you know.

Yeah, I know all that.

But here's the thing:

Nobody is sneaking around your big-box store secretly slipping in cards of teams you hate into packs that they somehow know you're going to buy.

It's not paranoia if it's true.


TheHitKing said…
I see your whinning has returned... That's a nice morgan and chapman card btw. If you don't like it don't buy it. I guess im guilty too, these articles bring me down, yet I read them...
Kev said…
wonderful post, as always...
The "TM" marks next to the team names on the 1971 cards look hideous. (Leave it to Topps to find a way to screw up an otherwise good idea.)
arpsmith said…
Glad my Giants cards are on the way, bummed these won't be with them. Want to do one more smaller trade? I have 3 Dodgers base dups I just pulled today and I could throw in a couple others?

LMK, Adam
BA Benny said…
You are on fire tonight, I love it, please tell us how you really feel.
Great stuff Mr. Night Owl!
flywheels said…
Did you not stand in the store looking through all the rack pack wrappers for a Dodgers card on the top or bottom of the stack? I know I did until I found a pack w/ a Chipper Jones on the top!
LOL this is too funny. Once I got several sentences into this, the narrator in my head reading this to me was a mix between Darlene from Rosanne and Andy's wife from Parks & Rec.

Personally, I'm liking these cards. Not necessarily enough to buy any, but just enough to have a smile come over my face when I see them on the net. There is just something so wrong about seeing someone like Pujols on a 1980 Topps card that just makes it right.
Commishbob said…
Dear Night Owl

Try decaf.


Btw...I was loling
Hackenbush said…
Great crankyass post! Other than picking up a few singles sometime, maybe, I'm sure I won't be buying any of this set. I'm looking forward to A&G this year. I forget if you're cranky about that product too.
arpsmith said…
Great, the 54 style Kemp and Jackie along with the 80 style Dee Gordon are on their way along with a few other Dodger goodies I can scrounge up.

Even though our taste in teams is quite different, your post was still hilarious.
Fuji said…
I agree... Lineage, Fan Favorites, and Archives are essentially the same products. And although I'm a huge fan, I think they should offer one of them every 3 to 4 years.

On the flipside... that Will Clark short print is awesome. I agree... the Giants suck! But I guess growing up in the Bay Area, I learned to appreciate The Thrill's game.
jacobmrley said…
I have a mini Duke Snider GQ that I am sure will gladly trade places with that Willie Mays sticker thingy.
GCA said…
Like Jim.. said, The TMs and circle-R's have to GO. They're ridiculous.
Robert said…
"Prepare for bitter commentary"

Love it.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Selfless card acts

The trouble with the world, if I may be so bold to weigh in (it's not like anyone else is holding back), is that not enough people think outward.

Take a look at just about every world problem that there is, and within each of those individual maelstroms, is somebody, usually a lot of folks, thinking only of themselves.

Looking out for No. 1 is a big, big problem on this earth. One of the biggest. And it's not getting better. I see it coming from all directions and all sides. No one is innocent. Everyone is guilty. Selfishness is the crime.

Our hobby is not immune. That's what makes the baseball card blog community so great, because it's a daily example of what can be achieved when you think of others first, before yourself.

Selflessness is such a staple of card blogs that some collectors have become immune to its charms. "Oh boy, here's another post about what somebody got thanks to the goodness of someone's heart. I don't need to read THAT." I a…