Skip to main content


I will probably never watch an NBA game, for more than a couple minutes, for the rest of my life.

This is no surprise. I've made it through half a lifetime without doing it so far. A guy tends to get set in his ways the second half of life.

But it came to mind about a week or so ago when I heard about how excited Los Angeles was about its sports teams. The Dodgers -- the best team in baseball -- could barely get any coverage because the NBA's Lakers and Clippers were deep in the playoffs, and the NHL's Kings were making an unexpected charge to the Stanley Cup.

And I thought, "if I was living in Los Angeles, I'd be pissed about this."

I am a Dodger fan, and almost nothing else. The NHL sort of exists for me, but the NBA is a non-entity. Who cares what the Lakers, Clippers and Kings are doing? Who are they? The DODGERS are the best team in baseball!!! Everyone in L.A. should be paying attention to them!

But then I'm an odd bird.

Even when Michael Jordan was doing his thing in the NBA -- when he was drawing legions of new fans to the sport and everyone wanted to be like Mike, I was turning to page C6 of the sports section, saying, "I wonder how the Twins did against the Royals last night."

If Michael Jordan could not get me interested in the NBA, then nothing can get me interested in the NBA.

To legions of sports fans, the No. 23 means Michael Jordan. No one else. How can it mean anybody else?

But not to me.

To me, No. 23 is attached to a handful of Dodgers of note. A lot of L.A. Dodgers have worn the number, but a couple in particular made it memorable, right about the time that Jordan was doing his thing.

Let's travel through the timeline, shall we?

The first Los Angeles Dodger to wear 23 carried it from Brooklyn to Los Angeles. Infielder Don Zimmer was 23 in Brooklyn and in L.A. He wore it from 1954-59.

He left the Dodgers after '59, but returned in 1963, and reclaimed No. 23 for himself.

While Zimmer was playing for the Cubs and the Mets and the Reds, a few no-names wore the number for the Dodgers. Pitcher Ed Palmquist from 1960-61. Pitcher Willard Hunter in 1962. Infielder Marv Breeding in 1963. I have to say I vaguely know only who Breeding is.

After Zimmer departed the Dodgers for the second time, No. 23 went to Bart Shirley, a young infield prospect, who has already appeared on one of these uniform number retrospectives.

Shirley bounced between the Dodgers, Mets and the minor leagues during his career. By the time Topps thought he deserved a card, in 1969, Shirley had already switched to No. 11, and was out of the major leagues.

Claude Osteen had taken the number from Shirley in 1965 and made it his own for nine years. A mainstay of the Dodgers' rotation from the mid-1960s to the early 1970s, Osteen was the most successful No. 23 on the Dodgers for a long time.

But then in December of 1973, Osteen was traded to the Astros for slugger Jimmy Wynn, who assumed the No. 23 and brought it to the outfield for the first time.

Wynn also enjoyed success with the number, winning Comeback Player of the Year honors in 1974. But he was traded two years later in the deal that brought Dusty Baker to the Dodgers.

The No. 23 then went to a series of role players:

Ted Martinez, 1977-79

Vic Davalillo, 1980

Dave Sax, 1982

Current Dodgers pitching coach Rick Honeycutt wore No. 23 when he came over in a trade with the Rangers in 1983.

But he shortly switched to No. 40, the number he wore in Seattle and Texas, for the rest of his Dodger career.

R.J. Reynolds, a player that I wanted to be a star, looked positively smoking in the No. 23 from 1983-85.

The number continued to bounce around in the '80s. New acquisition Enos Cabell -- whipping boy of Bill James -- wore it in 1985.

Pitcher Tim Leary also wore it for a year, in 1987, after coming over from Milwaukee.

And then Kirk Gibson changed No. 23 for all time. You have Michael Jordan. I have Kirk Gibson. He IS No. 23 for me.

Gibson wore the number for the entirety of his all-too-brief time with the Dodgers.

When he left, he left the number in good hands.

Eric Karros is the most successful No. 23 in Dodger history. He is the franchise's all-time home run leader and wore the number for 12 years, from 1991-2002.

The number has bounced all over the diamond since then.

Third baseman Robin Ventura in 2003-04

Pitcher Derek Lowe from 2005-08

Third baseman Casey Blake in 2009-11.

Today, outfielder Bobby Abreu is wearing No. 23. I don't anticipate him being with the team for long. So No. 23 will bounce to someone else soon.

Of course, in baseball, the No. 23 is also associated with Ryne Sandberg, Don Mattingly, and a host of others.

Nobody as famous as Michael Jordan. Nobody with his legacy.

But we all know baseball is the only sport that matters.


ToppsGuy said…
Gibby is 23 for me, although a Detroit Tiger, but still an all around awesome 23!
Commishbob said…
Eric Karros, all time LA Dodger home run leader? I had no clue. I more or less 'missed' his whole career.

Now I know.
Dave Sax has a 22 on his helmet! I am so confused!! I'll always remember Gibby and his homerun trot.
Spiegel83 said…
Derek Lowe is my homeboy!

LA is a basketball town. It sucks but, the city really rallies around the Lakers from the Westside to the Valley to Downtown. It does frustrate me that the Dodgers aren't the number one team in the city. They are getting buzz though now that the Laker season ended. The Kings steal some of it but, the Dodgers are always talked about.
gcrl said…
I was looking at that davalillo the other day and wondered why he switched from 33. Bbref doesn't show him as wearing 23 but the proof is in the picture.
night owl said…
PATP ~ Dave Sax wore 23 and then 22 for the Dodgers. There aren't a lot of Dave Sax cards out there.
jacobmrley said…
Mike Baxter forever!
Once a Cub said…
I always wanted to be 23 growing up but 23 will always be Ryno to me. He was a HOFer in Chicago before that other joker showed up anyway.
GCA said…
Between the fights in the stands a few years ago and the Olympic team that didn't even try, I have no use for basketball either.

PS there was a picture of "23" in the robot-proofing below.
I was kind of the same way. I hardly knew basketball existed as a child. I was too busy with my eyes plastered on Canseco and the A's.
night owl said…
Update: Adrian Gonzalez now wears No. 23 for the Dodgers. (2012 - ?)
night owl said…
2012-17. In 2018, bullpen coach Mark Prior is wearing 23.

Popular posts from this blog

The slash era

I'm not sure how many images of Joe Adell on the 2021 Topps design you have seen already. At the moment of this writing (3:42 p.m.), I've seen it several times, as well as a couple of blog posts about it. I'm sure there are more on the way.

These are what people are saying about it ...

Wait, I suppose I need to show you the image one more time:

There you are.

OK, now, the first reference I saw to it when I woke up out of my nest late this morning is that the design has a border. This was met with applause and I'm right there with them. It's the first Topps bordered flagship set since 2015, although you could make a case for 2019.

There is a lot of tinkering with the border but that just continues the theme of the entire design, which is: IT'S AWFULLY BUSY, AIN'T IT?????

How many design elements are on that card? Ten? Twelve? Fifteen? (Also, purple? There is no purple in the Angels color scheme. Are we going back to the random Topps colors of the '60s, …

The weird things collectors do

It is interesting to me how card collectors seem to have so much in common, as far as interests, personality tendencies, how their brains are wired, etc., and still can be so different.

There are many things that card collectors do that confuse the heck out of me. ... Why? Why would they do that? ... And there are many ways card collectors think that don't match my collecting thought process at all.

I think the influence of the time period in which a collector grew up has a lot to do with the differences. And that's what I'm going to chalk up to the excuse I am now giving to whatever lost soul decided to grade a 1982 Topps Burt Hooton card.

Let's go through the reasons why there's no need to grade a 1982 Topps Burt Hooton:

1. The card came out in 1982.
2. It's Burt Hooton.

I'm done.

But, I'm thinking, somebody grew up in a period when everyone was grading cards and that, yes, even commons should be graded because, you know, they could, uh ... they coul…

Thrill of the chase

An old high school classmate asked me this week how to go about selling some completed Topps baseball sets that she had purchased for her sons each year while they were growing up.

I explained how to search for the sets on eBay by using the completed listings option, but because she is one of my favorite former classmates, to help lessen the shock for her, I searched the sets myself and then gave her an average for each of them, along with an explanation of why they weren't worth much more than what she had paid for them originally.

The sets were from 1997-2008 and with the exception of the 2001 set, which at 790 cards is the largest of the bunch and also contains the Ichiro rookie card, it was clear that nobody values completed sets anymore. At least not non-vintage completed sets.

I already knew this. But seeing it underlined in back-lit numbers stunned me a bit. The 2005 complete set sells for only 40 bucks? I like the 2005 set! I'm trying to complete the 2005 set! Why don…