Skip to main content

Someone from Bowman who actually made it

Bowman is not meant for me. I try to say that every time I mention Bowman because I'm sure there is some Bowman lover reading me bashing on his favorite product who is saying over and over "BOWMAN IS NOT FOR YOU! QUIT BITCHING!!!!"

So, just so you know, I know that Bowman is not for me.

I know this because of the Scott Van Slyke card here.

I received this card way back in one of my first blog trades almost four years ago. I believe it was from Dinged Corners. They liked to send wacky photos like this and this is a wacky one.

Van Slyke is the son of former Pirates outfielder, the wacky Andy Van Slyke, and I've said before that I'm convinced Bowman only printed a card of Scott so they could use the photo here. He wasn't considered a big prospect at the time, which is evidenced by the back of the card in which the first line of his resume says "Placed sixth on Great Lakes roster in 2007 with 89 hits."

Placed sixth. In hits. On a Low Class A team.

A proud moment for him to be sure, but not something someone who is used to collecting cards of major league players wants to read on the back of a baseball card.

These cards of Van Slyke appeared in one of the 2008 Bowman sets, a pack of which I never bought.

That's the way it almost always goes. Unless I'm in some sort of weird, pack-buying junkie frenzy, I can avoid Bowman as if I'm looking at doilies or drapes or HGTV. It doesn't even register.

I need a bigger return on my investment. If I'm buying a pack, I like to have heard of all the players in the pack. And, even more importantly, I want to be assured that all the players in the pack are or will be major league baseball players.

Otherwise, it's a waste of money.

All of these Van Slyke cards came in trades, and there's Van Slyke still balancing that helmet.

He found his swing somewhere in Double A and started hitting. Last season, he was named the Minor League Position Player of the Year.

And then, yesterday, he was called up by the Dodgers after Juan Rivera went on the disabled list. In his first at-bat, he broke his bat hitting an RBI single up the middle against the Giants. It was the first time a Dodger had driven in a run in his first major league at-bat in 51 years.

Van Slyke had made it. Someone who I never thought would make it, who was just one of those "ha, ha, look at this, I have FOUR Bowman cards of this guy and he never made it" had actually made it.

Good for him.

I suppose this is what Bowman collectors live for, some player who nobody knows, who is automatically discounted, who ends up actually playing in a big league game.

But for me, I can't be waiting four years for something that might happen. Out of all the Bowman Dodgers prospects from the 2008 set that I have, Van Slyke is only the second who has made it with the Dodgers. Dee Gordon (then known as Devaris Strange-Gordon) is the other.

Wesley Wright made it with the Astros. Bryan Morris is in Triple A with the Pirates. Pedro Baez is in Double A with the Dodgers. Jaime Pedroza was released last year. Brian Mathews has been out of pro ball since 2009.

I've seen a lot of posts about 2012 Bowman this week.

It's gotten me a little curious, but not much. I don't even know if it's on a store shelf where I live yet. I have to take my daughter to Target later today, so I'll find out then.

It's possible I may even buy a pack of the stuff that I can avoid so easily.

But whatever prospects come out of that pack, I know I'm not holding on for four years hoping they make it.

I don't have time to look up projections and scouting reports and calendars of 2016. I'm a busy guy, you know.

But congrats, Scott. May there be many more hits against the Giants to come.

Oh, and it's not "bitching." It's "constructive criticism."


cynicalbuddha said…
I'm right there with you. I decided back in 2002 that I wanted to try and put the Bowman set together this is right around the time that they went to the insane numbering system they still use today. Lets just say it left a bad taste in my mouth. I actaully like this years design. But I don't plan on buying a single pack of this stuff. I just bought my Brewers team set from ebay and I'm done.
coronado2010 said…
i just got into BDPP this season and really liked it. I like the prosppects because they're more apped to sign ttm. plus because of the chrome cards i pulled several hits. I understand though...have only heard of 4 players out of the
chuckneo said…
Bowman is also not for me. Definitely not 1994 and after. And maybe not even 1992 or 1993. I actually kind of like the earlier incarnations of Bowman, because they are kind of like retro sets. And if nobody has noticed - I like retro sets!

Spiegel83 said…
I found the top Van Slyke card in my Dodgers dupes/bums box. It must have been sent to me months ago. I don't open Bowman so, it must have came from a trade. I am happy that I found it now and I hope Van Slyke is on his way to a good career. He only needs to play good enough to get at-bats from Bobby Abreu, Tony Gwynn Jr. and Joames Loney. Should be easy for him.
I'm a Bowman fan because I like to send TTM requests to minor leaguers (usually better at responding than big leaguers). It's always nice to have a card of a player in the big league uniform, as opposed to an airbrushed Tristar card or something.

I have never understood the numbering system or the different variations, but as a TTM collector, I look forward to Bowman.
Sorry - overlooked corando2010's commends, which were very similar to mine.
Kbrewster/90 said…
I COULD like Bowman if they would stop picking guys that are out of baseball before their cards are printed. Prospecting first round draft picks is one thing. Putting cards out of players who have been in the minors forever and were never drafted is another.
Paul Hadsall said…
I don't think there are any Bowman collectors - just prospectors hoping to acquire cards of "the next big thing" before everyone else catches on.

I love going back a few years to look at the prospect cards of the other guys to see how many I remember that maybe I saw them in a short major league callup, or maybe I saw them play in the minors or indy baseball.

The Bowman cards I have no use for? The veterans... Topps doesn't put enough effort into card design for me to care about the 30th Albert Pujols, Derek Jeter or David Ortiz card of the year. :)
Brandon said…
Good to see Scott Van Slyke make it. I saw him play several times when he was with the Great Lakes Loons which is the next town over. He never seemed to me like a prospect so its a little surprising he made it. But good for him.
I bought a value pack when I couldn't find the Olympic blasters. I was not impressed, but I never am. I just don't prospect. They are great for TTMs if that's what you want, but I think there are billions of Bowman cards out there for guys who never even sniffed AAA.
steelehere said…
The first Dodger in 51 years to drive in a run in his first at bat stat isn't correct.

Off the top of my head Jose Offerman in 1990 and Garey Ingram in 1994 both homered in their first MLB at bat and thus also got an RBI.
night owl said…
My write-up should have read that Van Slyke was the first Dodger to drive in a run in his first at-bat AS A PINCH-HITTER in 51 years.

Always trying to keep me on my toes, steelhere.

Popular posts from this blog

A friend indeed

This week has been the kind of week that only late January could produce.

Nothing particularly wrong or terrible happened. Mostly what I felt this week was a sense of spinning my wheels, of working hard without result (or with other people screwing it up), of trying to get things accomplished (while battling a sinus infection) only to have a car noise or a phone call knock me back to square one.

That feeling transferred over to the blog where I probably spent too much time uploading too many photos and conducting too much research and expecting too much in return.

But all of this is a phase. It's the January malaise. I'll snap out of it. It could be worse. I could be dealing with three feet of snow right now instead of the melting three inches that is out there.

And I could be struggling through this week without an envelope in the mail from "A Friend".

That's right, "A Friend".

That's how the return address appeared on the envelope. Just above th…

Degrees of doneness

I just wrapped up my first notable card purchase of 2020.

It was an online order -- from three of every collector's favorite card-buying sites -- and with the exception of three inserts from 2019 and a stray card from 1989, every single card I ordered was made prior to 1980.

That feels good. That feels tremendously good.

I'm starting off 2020 in the right frame of mind.

It's also a good way to put a cork in the 2019 collecting season. There are various ways you can say you're done with the cards from the previous year, call it degrees of doneness, if you will (I order steaks "medium" or "medium well," I don't need anything crawling off my plate).

1. You can be done with collecting sets from 2019. I'm certainly done with that. I didn't try to collect many sets from that year anyway. The 2019 Topps Holiday set and a third of the 2019 Topps Archives set are finished and that's everything I plan to do.

2. You can be done with buying pac…

The lone Ranger

Who is Nick Solak?

Glad you asked.

And thanks to cynicalbuddha for scanning his card into Trading Card Database.

Nick Solak is a former Yankees, former Rays prospect who appeared in 33 games for the Texas Rangers last year.

That, apparently, qualifies him for being the only Texas Ranger to appear in the 350-card base set for 2020 Topps Series 1, a checklist of which was released this morning.

That's right, the ONLY Texas Ranger.

I did the count and the Rangers, with Solak shouldering the entire load, come up a distant 30th behind the 29th-place Orioles, who have a more typical seven cards.

Here is the breakdown by team that I compiled earlier:

Dodgers - 17
Astros - 17
Nationals - 16
Cubs - 15
Athletics - 14
Brewers - 14
Indians - 14
White Sox - 14
Phillies - 13
Angels - 12
Blue Jays - 12
Braves - 12
Padres - 12
Red Sox - 12
Reds - 12
Twins - 12
Yankees - 12
Cardinals - 11
Giants - 11
Marlins - 11
Mets - 11
Diamondbacks - 10
Mariners - 10
Rays - 10
Tigers - 10
Royals - 9
Pirates -…