Skip to main content

C.A.: 1971 Topps Vida Blue

(OK, one more chance to enter my 2,000th post contest. I hope to be adding up the results in the next couple of days and revealing a winner. But first, it's Cardboard Appreciation time. It's the 142nd in a series):

To me, this is among the most memorable cards in collecting history. It is my era's 1986 Donruss Jose Canseco  or 2001 Bowman Chrome Albert Pujols.

I wasn't collecting in 1971. I was only five. But I knew about this card from my earliest stages in the hobby. Vida Blue's smile, his combination pitching pose/peace gesture, his epic 1971 season at the age of 22, made this an epic card, even if it was one I could only admire from afar.

But since I've completed the 1971 set, I can now admire it right in my hands.

Here, let me turn it over to the back:

Vida's still smiling. But you can see by the stats, he hasn't achieved very much in the majors, entering his breakout '71 season (although the blurb mentions that no-hitter at the end of the 1970 season).

OK, so now here comes the Fan Favorites comparison.

Fan Favorites issued Vida Blue cards in all three of its sets.

In 2004, Fan Favorites made Blue a Giant:

Ick. That's an odd wind-up shot.

But in the 2003 and 2005 sets, Blue is an Oakland A. And in each case, Topps puts him on a 1971 design, because Topps liked to match the player up with one of his greatest seasons -- when fans would most consider the player a "favorite."

Here is Blue's 2003 Fan Favorites card. And you can tell right away that this is not a photo of Blue during the 1970 or 1971 season. This is an older Blue.

The strange thing is that in all of Blue's Topps cards, from 1971-79, I don't think he's wearing a mustache on any of thm. This picture of Blue, given his facial hair, appears to match his early San Francisco Giants days in the late '70s/early '80s. So perhaps this photo is from late 1977.

The back of the card raises more discrepancies. First, there's another photo of an "older than 22" Blue. But look at the statistics. Blue's 1971 season is listed on the back of a 1971 card. That's rather odd. But Fan Favorites did this with a lot of its cards. For example, Blue's 2004 card in which he's with the Giants, lists his Giants years on the back, up to 1986, even though it's a card with a 1980 design.

I'm not criticizing here. This is the fun of Fan Favorites. Comparing the cards, matching them up with the "real" version of the card, and noting the similarities and differences.

Here is the 2005 Fan Favorites Vida Blue:

OK, Blue's an A, but he's got that mustache again, which leads me to believe it was taken right around the time of the 2003 Fan Favorites photo. Not exactly time accurate, but still fun.

Let's turn it to the back:

Topps is more true to the original on the back of the 2005 set. It even uses the same black-and-white photo that appeared on the 1971 card. The stats are from 1970, too, just like on the '71 set. The stats are slightly different. Topps goes with the more accurate 38.2 innings pitched rather than 39. It also omits the hits column, probably because the bold type used up too much space to add another column.

Thanks to Fan Favorites, I now have THREE "1971 Topps" Vida Blue cards. Only one of the coolest cats in baseball on one of the coolest designs ever.

But really, there's just one favorite among the three.

It's the one that I knew about that very first year I collected cards in 1975. Vida and his smile, saying to me, "Peace. Keep on Collecting, Kid."


Anonymous said…
For what it's worth... The photo on the 1971 card is from 1969. You can tell by the MLB patch (for MLB's 100th anniversary) under the "A" on the jersey.
arpsmith said…
I am a bit of a Vida collector and enjoy all 4 of the cards but especially the "real" 71 version.
Commishbob said…
Vida was heavily recruited by Bill Yeoman's University of Houston football staff as a quarterback. He was a couple years ahead of me but we would have been there at the same time.
deal said…
I love Blue's Facsimile "Signataure" on the 71 cards - oddly the 04 FF card which is different for showing him as a Giant also has a more cursive signage.

Popular posts from this blog

A friend indeed

This week has been the kind of week that only late January could produce.

Nothing particularly wrong or terrible happened. Mostly what I felt this week was a sense of spinning my wheels, of working hard without result (or with other people screwing it up), of trying to get things accomplished (while battling a sinus infection) only to have a car noise or a phone call knock me back to square one.

That feeling transferred over to the blog where I probably spent too much time uploading too many photos and conducting too much research and expecting too much in return.

But all of this is a phase. It's the January malaise. I'll snap out of it. It could be worse. I could be dealing with three feet of snow right now instead of the melting three inches that is out there.

And I could be struggling through this week without an envelope in the mail from "A Friend".

That's right, "A Friend".

That's how the return address appeared on the envelope. Just above th…

Degrees of doneness

I just wrapped up my first notable card purchase of 2020.

It was an online order -- from three of every collector's favorite card-buying sites -- and with the exception of three inserts from 2019 and a stray card from 1989, every single card I ordered was made prior to 1980.

That feels good. That feels tremendously good.

I'm starting off 2020 in the right frame of mind.

It's also a good way to put a cork in the 2019 collecting season. There are various ways you can say you're done with the cards from the previous year, call it degrees of doneness, if you will (I order steaks "medium" or "medium well," I don't need anything crawling off my plate).

1. You can be done with collecting sets from 2019. I'm certainly done with that. I didn't try to collect many sets from that year anyway. The 2019 Topps Holiday set and a third of the 2019 Topps Archives set are finished and that's everything I plan to do.

2. You can be done with buying pac…

The lone Ranger

Who is Nick Solak?

Glad you asked.

And thanks to cynicalbuddha for scanning his card into Trading Card Database.

Nick Solak is a former Yankees, former Rays prospect who appeared in 33 games for the Texas Rangers last year.

That, apparently, qualifies him for being the only Texas Ranger to appear in the 350-card base set for 2020 Topps Series 1, a checklist of which was released this morning.

That's right, the ONLY Texas Ranger.

I did the count and the Rangers, with Solak shouldering the entire load, come up a distant 30th behind the 29th-place Orioles, who have a more typical seven cards.

Here is the breakdown by team that I compiled earlier:

Dodgers - 17
Astros - 17
Nationals - 16
Cubs - 15
Athletics - 14
Brewers - 14
Indians - 14
White Sox - 14
Phillies - 13
Angels - 12
Blue Jays - 12
Braves - 12
Padres - 12
Red Sox - 12
Reds - 12
Twins - 12
Yankees - 12
Cardinals - 11
Giants - 11
Marlins - 11
Mets - 11
Diamondbacks - 10
Mariners - 10
Rays - 10
Tigers - 10
Royals - 9
Pirates -…