Skip to main content

Freaky blue eyes


A while ago, Thorzul Will Rule featured one of those card war podcasts, and I actually made it through the entire thing.

(Don't get offended. I merely have no time to watch entire videos or listen to entire podcasts. It's not the content. It's the format).

On the podcast, Thorzul made a comment about the 1972 Topps set containing a lot of players featuring one particular character trait. He called it "freaky blue eyes."

I knew immediately what he was talking about because I had noticed this, too. I also noticed it because I, in fact, possess "freaky blue eyes."

It's OK. I'm all right with it. Chicks happen to dig them. Isn't that right, Jim?

But, it's true, they can be viewed as "freaky," in that vacant, soul-less, stare-right-through-you-so-they-can-absorb-your-life-essence sort of way.


Kind of like Dennis here. Don't look directly at him.

I don't know why this aspect seems so noticeable on 1972 Topps. Either Topps went out of its way that year to bring out the blue in players' eyes -- players were still kind of poor at this time, maybe they needed help getting dates -- or, more likely, it has something to do with the colorful borders. They bring out the color in the photos ... er, or something.


Even if the photo isn't a close-up, freaky blue-eyed players still stand out, like Steve Arlin. His eyes are the same color as the border on the card. And he appears to be waiting for instructions from the mother ship.


Toby Harrah, too. He's squinting. But you can still tell he has some wacked-out eyes, and they are scanning the skies waiting for orders.


The Rangers feature lots of examples of freaky blue eyes, just because almost all of the cards in the '72 team set are portrait shots.


More Rangers freakiness. I still say Billings looks like The Grinch here.


Although The Grinch has freaky red eyes.


Glenn's freaky blue eyes go with his Cubs uniform. The ladies love that.


Mickey's freaky blue eyes stand out just because it's the only color on the card, outside of the sky.


Freaky blue eyes are a lot more obvious-looking on the card in person than on a scan. On a scan, sometimes you have to zoom  in a little closer.


Yup, freaky.


Freaky?


Definitely freaky.

I went through my entire 1972 Topps collection in search of the suitably freaky. I thought I'd find a lot more of them. But I have a long way to go to complete this set. So I'll be looking forward to a lot more freaky blue-eyed, soul-sucking ballplayers from the '70s.

Just remember: they get all the babes.

Comments

Cory said…
The Dyer card is the best one.
Cliff said…
I have Harrah and Billings down as freaky nostril shots:

http://reallybadbaseballcards.blogspot.com/2014/07/1972-year-of-nostril.html

You might want to check out the 1970 cards for some really weird spooky blue eye shots. Joe Niekro, Joe Hoerner, Gerry Nyman, Tom Hilgendorff, and Gail Hopkins really stand out.

Popular posts from this blog

A friend indeed

This week has been the kind of week that only late January could produce.

Nothing particularly wrong or terrible happened. Mostly what I felt this week was a sense of spinning my wheels, of working hard without result (or with other people screwing it up), of trying to get things accomplished (while battling a sinus infection) only to have a car noise or a phone call knock me back to square one.

That feeling transferred over to the blog where I probably spent too much time uploading too many photos and conducting too much research and expecting too much in return.

But all of this is a phase. It's the January malaise. I'll snap out of it. It could be worse. I could be dealing with three feet of snow right now instead of the melting three inches that is out there.

And I could be struggling through this week without an envelope in the mail from "A Friend".


That's right, "A Friend".

That's how the return address appeared on the envelope. Just above th…

Degrees of doneness

I just wrapped up my first notable card purchase of 2020.

It was an online order -- from three of every collector's favorite card-buying sites -- and with the exception of three inserts from 2019 and a stray card from 1989, every single card I ordered was made prior to 1980.

That feels good. That feels tremendously good.

I'm starting off 2020 in the right frame of mind.

It's also a good way to put a cork in the 2019 collecting season. There are various ways you can say you're done with the cards from the previous year, call it degrees of doneness, if you will (I order steaks "medium" or "medium well," I don't need anything crawling off my plate).

1. You can be done with collecting sets from 2019. I'm certainly done with that. I didn't try to collect many sets from that year anyway. The 2019 Topps Holiday set and a third of the 2019 Topps Archives set are finished and that's everything I plan to do.

2. You can be done with buying pac…

The lone Ranger

Who is Nick Solak?

Glad you asked.

And thanks to cynicalbuddha for scanning his card into Trading Card Database.

Nick Solak is a former Yankees, former Rays prospect who appeared in 33 games for the Texas Rangers last year.

That, apparently, qualifies him for being the only Texas Ranger to appear in the 350-card base set for 2020 Topps Series 1, a checklist of which was released this morning.

That's right, the ONLY Texas Ranger.

I did the count and the Rangers, with Solak shouldering the entire load, come up a distant 30th behind the 29th-place Orioles, who have a more typical seven cards.

Here is the breakdown by team that I compiled earlier:

Dodgers - 17
Astros - 17
Nationals - 16
Cubs - 15
Athletics - 14
Brewers - 14
Indians - 14
White Sox - 14
Phillies - 13
Angels - 12
Blue Jays - 12
Braves - 12
Padres - 12
Red Sox - 12
Reds - 12
Twins - 12
Yankees - 12
Cardinals - 11
Giants - 11
Marlins - 11
Mets - 11
Diamondbacks - 10
Mariners - 10
Rays - 10
Tigers - 10
Royals - 9
Pirates -…