Skip to main content

Best set of the year: 1982

Continuing with my subjective evaluation of the major sets from each year since 1981, we have the sets of 1982. Like 1981, there was Topps, Fleer and Donruss. Like 1981, I tried to complete all three -- although not as enthusiastically as the year before. Like 1981, none of these sets rate even close to my all-time favorites.

Although '81 drastically altered the card-collecting landscape, '82 was a bit more subtle with its changes. The changes were more in terms of philosophy with the given card brand. Topps scrapped some long-standing traditions to start a few new ones. Donruss created a card back that it would use for the next decade. And Fleer, well, Fleer didn't do much new. Apparently, odd photos and errors were company policy.

So, it's time to see what was good and bad about cards in '82 -- the last year I would seriously try to collect all three brands.

1982 Topps -- the front

Plusses: A colorful design that appropriately reflects the time period ... The addition of some new features -- or at least new to collectors in '82 -- like separate All-Star cards, team leaders checklists, and In Action cards, which may or may not have been a 10-year homage to the '72 In Action cards. ... More dugout shots!

Minuses: Again, the color borders didn't match with the teams. The Dodgers got pink again. ... The disappearance of All-Star banners on the respective player's base card, something that had been in practice since 1975.

1982 Topps -- the back

Plusses: Not a lot to say here. When the cartoon was on the back, which was hit-and-miss, it livened things up a little.

Minuses: Dark green AGAIN? Topps used dark green backs for 1974, 1976, 1977, 1979 and 1982 before finally running out of that color of paint. ... I never understood why there couldn't be two cartoons on the back instead of one and then a boring factoid in the other spot. Jerry Dybzinski's first hit? Who? ... Like '81, Topps scrapped the cartoon if there were too many stats, which made for a pretty dull back.

1982 Topps -- overall

Plusses: Tradition ... Good ol' cardboard ... An expanded 792-card set, which was absolutely huge at the time. ... Lots of interesting/new subsets. ... Nice focus on color again. ... Cal Ripken rookie card.

Minuses: Although there's nothing wrong with the design, it's never been my favorite. It should be the next '80s set I try to complete, and I just can't get into it. ... The extra All-Star cards cheapened the base cards of the respective stars. It was always a thrill to have that card feature an all-star logo. They were special, special cards. ... The addition of the All-Star cards and In Action cards (and to a lesser extent, the team-leader cards) smacked of an attempt to get multiple cards of certain players in the set, copying what Fleer and Donruss did in '81. ... The end of team photos on cards for like two decades was sad to see. ... Continued boring backs that would become epidemic in the '80s.

1982 Fleer -- the front

Plusses: A simple design that works. ... Design colors are coded with team's colors. ... Some of the photos are ones collectors had never seen before, in a good way.

Minuses: A record-setting number of out-of-focus photos. ... A record-setting number of poorly centered photos. Honestly, it looks like my grandmother, the one who always had her finger on the lens, took some of the pictures.

1982 Fleer -- the back

Plusses: A cool, color logo of the team in the right corner. That caught my eye right away. ... Replacing the gray of the 1981 card back with blue. It's a sickly blue, but at least it's not gray. ... Putting vital stats on the bottom. That was slightly different.

Minuses: Still with the yellow. Yuck. ... Still with the empty space under the stats. Yuck. ... The colors used for the back put me in mind of something from the '60s. Not very forward-thinking.

1982 Fleer -- overall

Plusses: I didn't mention this the last time, but Fleer is to be commended for putting the set in order by team ... The beginnings of SuperStar Specials, although Fleer didn't call them that then. Some wacky, random pairings, but some of them were fun. ... I really like the design. If the photos were any good, it would have worked well. In fact, I have an unnatural love for '82 Fleer. ... Cal Ripken rookie card.

Minuses: A set that would be derided the instant it hit the shelves for the slip-shod way it was produced. ... Errors, errors, errors ... Some of the cards looked like set-filler. "Steve and Carlton," I'm looking at you.

1982 Donruss -- the front

Plusses: A completely different design and look from its debut year. ... The ball and bat graphic is cliche, but it works for some people. ... Much more focus on the photo. ... More action shots.

Minuses: I found the bat-and-ball childish the moment I pulled my first '82 Donruss card out of a pack. ... Some of the pictures are dark.

1982 Donruss -- the back

Plusses: None, really.

Minuses: I don't like these backs -- only 5 years of stats (an outrage for people like Carl Yastrzemski), the elimination of the timeline from the previous year -- not good. ... The card backs were always upside down when you flipped them over, compared with the traditional Topps and Fleer orientation for horizontal card backs.

1982 Donruss -- overall

Plusses: A much more professional-looking set than the previous year. ... A larger set. ... For the second year in a row, the only set with manager cards. ... The only set with coach cards, although the randomness was kind of weird. ... The first San Diego Chicken card. ... Cal Ripken rookie card.

Minuses: Nothing about this set made me want to collect it. I almost thought it was for little kids. ... The card backs would spawn year-after-year of the same back, making me totally uninterested in turning over the card.

And so it's time to declare the winner:



I promise that Topps won't come out on top ever year. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Ranking: 1. Topps; 2. Donruss; 3. Fleer

Total ranking: Topps-2, Donruss-0, Fleer-0


Commishbob said…
Jeez, I can't tell you the number of '82 commons from all 3 of those sets I threw away back when I did a 'card purge' 10 years or so ago.
But that Ripken Rookie!! I had bought 800 count boxes of Oriole cards and had probably 75/100 Ripken Rookies, mostly Topps. It was at it's height when I decided to go back and finish my last semester of grad school. They pretty much paid for that semester.
It seems to me that EVERYONE phoned it in in '82.
Matt Runyon said…
1982 was probably the weakest card year of the decade. I liked the timelines on the 1981 Donruss backs -- too bad they stopped doing that.
Mariner1 said…
I've really started to take a liking to the 82 Fleer set in the last month or so. Everytime I see some I continue to pick them up. I'm thinking of one day maybe trying to build the set.
Jason said…
This post brought back a lot of memories. Jerry Dybzinski - first thought was 'Dibber', which is what longtime Tribe announcer Joe Tait always called him.
I thought Topps put out the ugliest design in their history, at least until 1990 rolled around.
Totally agree with your thoughts on Fleer. I liked the design so much I bought the whole set after only opening a couple packs, then was hugely disappointed to see so many blurry pictures.
Donruss, with the kiddie looking set, I thought did the best job, but that's not saying much. At least they managed to put a set out without using the same Rod Carew photo that Fleer and Topps (In Action) used.
Erik said…
Love the post. I might be the only one who prefers the '82 Donruss set. For some reason I like the bat/ball base over the designs of the other sets. Some day I wouldn't mind trying to complete that set, I don't think unopened material is too expensive for that set.
MCT said…
I began collecting baseball cards in the second half of the '70s, when Topps would put the All-Star designation on the player's base card. To me, that's just how things are supposed to be. I could never get used to the separate All-Star cards from 1982 on.
beefman said…
I was 3 when these sets came out, so I waited until a couple of years ago before I found all 3 complete sets on Ebay for about $100 total. I preferred the Topps set too, mainly because it was more comprehensive. Though they get a minus for the multi-player Ripken. And the 'hockey-stick' design!
Anonymous said…
Aahhh a lil' '82 Topps love. This made my day.

Which reminds me, my blog will be updated a lot in April & early May. I've already typed up the posts & have them set to publish on specific days.
Anonymous said…
I've got to agree with you - 82 Topps is the best of a mediocre lot.

Unknown said…
I have a hand collated 82D set. I can't seem to every go 3 or 4 cards without finding one that is off center either on the front or back.
Fuji said…
Love that 1982 Topps set from when I was a kid... it's the bright colored stripes that do it for me.

I'm with you... Topps, Donruss, then Fleer.
1982 was my second year to collect so I remember being so excited to see new cards coming out. I bought mostly Topps because I couldn't find much else.
Classon Ave said…
I'm fond of the '82 Topps set, and think it has aged pretty well. I'm not wild about the green either, I can live with it.

My '82 Grades
1. Topps 9.4
2. Fleer 6.3
3. Donruss 1.9

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Selfless card acts

The trouble with the world, if I may be so bold to weigh in (it's not like anyone else is holding back), is that not enough people think outward.

Take a look at just about every world problem that there is, and within each of those individual maelstroms, is somebody, usually a lot of folks, thinking only of themselves.

Looking out for No. 1 is a big, big problem on this earth. One of the biggest. And it's not getting better. I see it coming from all directions and all sides. No one is innocent. Everyone is guilty. Selfishness is the crime.

Our hobby is not immune. That's what makes the baseball card blog community so great, because it's a daily example of what can be achieved when you think of others first, before yourself.

Selflessness is such a staple of card blogs that some collectors have become immune to its charms. "Oh boy, here's another post about what somebody got thanks to the goodness of someone's heart. I don't need to read THAT." I a…