Skip to main content

The book that started it all

This, in a roundabout way, is my response to the results from the "Where has Topps Gone Wrong" poll I posted. It's obvious, according to those who voted (and I know for a fact Chris Harris did not vote 36 times), that Topps' gimmickry is mostly to blame for the feelings of ill will that collectors have for "The Real One." Actually, the poll categories were fairly even until news of the Sarah Palin beauty queen card broke, and then that second column pulled a Carl Lewis.

The poll's not up anymore, but here are the results written out:

Too may gimmicks: 52 percent
Too many sets: 25 percent
Too expensive: 22 percent
Poor card design: 19 percent
Topps rules, the rest drool: 16 percent
Too many relics/autographs: 11 percent
Too little customer service: 8 percent

I, personally, have the most problem with the first and second categories. I'm surprised that the relics/autos category didn't draw more votes, though. I know some bloggers have noted that the thrill of pulling those just isn't there anymore because there are so many autos and relics available.

Anyway, the folks at Stale Gum, Cardboard Junkie, Trader Crack's, etc., have already addressed the gimmick issue in all its various inglorious forms (Fukudome, the Jeter card, Favre on his riding mower, yada, yada), and I can't add anything more to that except a few amens and then wait for news of the next Topps shell game.

So, I'm addressing this by going back to the past, to the days of what's believed to be the very first (edit: the first modern) price guide, the book you see at the top, the 1979 Sports Americana Baseball Price Guide. It was the precursor to the current annual Beckett price guides. The '79 version was compiled by Dr. James Beckett and Dennis Eckes (by the way, you can buy the '79 guide at Fritsch Cards for $74.95. Apparently, I have the "rare white cover," although, as you can see, it's now as white as snow downtown in February).

It's fun to look at the book and see the simplicity of the hobby back then. It's also fun to look at all the check marks I wrote in the book, noting who I had and who I didn't. (Any '75 mini cards I had are denoted with a largely-scrawled "M") There are plenty of photos, unlike the current guides. And there are a few card montages, along with one devoted to non-sports cards:

Charlie's Angels cards are featured five times on these two pages, as opposed to the other card series being featured once. Someone at Beckett had an unhealthy obsession with Farrah Fawcett, because she would pop up in strange places in future Beckett guides, too.

The best part of this guide, of course, are the prices of cards back then. It makes me wish I was an avid collector in the '70s because everything was so cheap. A few prices from back in the day, all for cards in mint condition:

1978 Topps Rookie Shortstops (Molitor/Trammell): 3 cents
1975 Topps set: $20
1974 Topps Dave Winfield: 12 cents
1971 Topps high numbers: 19 cents each
1969 Topps Mickey Mantle: $3.50 (no notation for white letter variation)
1959 Topps Hank Aaron: $7.00 (most expensive card in set, along with Mantle)
1956 Topps Jackie Robinson: $8.50
1952 Topps Mickey Mantle: $500
1949 Leaf Joe DiMaggio: $60
1933 Goudy Babe Ruth: $90
T206 Honus Wagner: $4,800

At the front of the book is the introduction that Beckett has had in its price guide books in various forms over the years, although the '79 intro is refreshing in its simplicity. No mention of "short-printing" or "deceptive trimming" or similar scheming. The one category I found the most interesting is the addressing of card value. The book mentions five categories when determining value:

1. Age of card
2. Player portrayed on card
3. Initial scarcity (amount of times card was printed)
4. Popularity of set
5. Condition of card

It goes on to mention that card condition is perhaps the most important category. And back then, it was. I remember when I was collecting as a kid, condition, who was on the card, and age of the card, were the three biggest factors. Initial scarcity was never a thought.

But initial scarcity has grown to almost overwhelm the other factors in today's market. It's also what feeds the gimmick monster. And, I think, until collectors stop caring about 1 of 1s and other scarcity issues, or at least stop making it the most important factor in their pursuit of cards, then gimmicks will always be a problem.

Still, collectors' habits don't excuse Topps. Their gimmicks, and the way they go about them, are sneaky, underhanded, deceptive, distasteful, and in many cases meant to be funny, but are not funny at all. What they do and how they do it is bad business sense, and it will hurt them, eventually.

Comments

dayf said…
Great post, I love looking through old price guides and magazines to see how the modern hobby formed back then. The actual first price guide is Jefferson Burdick's American Card Catalog, but this is definitely the first one for the modern era. My oldest one is from 1982 and it's pretty cool looking at the old ads, articles, and of course prices. It's cool you have the 'rare' cover version, it would be fun to look through it.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Selfless card acts

The trouble with the world, if I may be so bold to weigh in (it's not like anyone else is holding back), is that not enough people think outward.

Take a look at just about every world problem that there is, and within each of those individual maelstroms, is somebody, usually a lot of folks, thinking only of themselves.

Looking out for No. 1 is a big, big problem on this earth. One of the biggest. And it's not getting better. I see it coming from all directions and all sides. No one is innocent. Everyone is guilty. Selfishness is the crime.

Our hobby is not immune. That's what makes the baseball card blog community so great, because it's a daily example of what can be achieved when you think of others first, before yourself.

Selflessness is such a staple of card blogs that some collectors have become immune to its charms. "Oh boy, here's another post about what somebody got thanks to the goodness of someone's heart. I don't need to read THAT." I a…