Skip to main content

Awesomest night card, round 1, part 4


In two days, we will have reached the 22nd anniversary of Orel Hershiser's Game 7 shutout of the New York Mets in the National League Championship Series.

It was a significant part of the Postseason of Orel in 1988, which was enough to advance this 1989 Upper Deck night card into the next round of the Awesomest Night Card Tournament.

Here is the voting breakdown:

1989 Upper Deck Orel Hershiser World Series - 24 votes
2005 Topps Randy Johnson Season Highlights - 8 votes
2008 Topps U&H Evan Longoria All-Star -3 votes
2005 Topps U&H Geoff Blum Postseason Highlights - 1 vote
2006 Topps U&H Trevor Hoffman Season Highlights - 0 votes

Trevor Hoffman is the lucky first night card to receive NO VOTES. That's what happens when you blow an All-Star Game win.

OK, time for Part 4 of the first round. Here are the candidates:


1972 Topps Stan Williams: I still believe that this could be the first night card as we know night cards to be now. The example from 1953 Topps is a painting. The Del Unser card from 1969 Topps appears to be dusk, not night, but I'm not completely sure. At any rate, this is possibly my favorite night card, and I'm happy to say I already have a duplicate of it to put in the night card binder.


2006 Topps Brad Ausmus: Brad has officially retired, which means I expect him to land a manager job any minute now.


2005 Topps Updates & Highlights Postseason Highlights: This card commemorates the Astros' 18-inning victory over the Braves in the NLDS. It also may have set a record for the most players featured on one card that isn't a team card.


2005 Topps Updates & Highlights Bobby Abreu Season Highlights: The Home Run Derby is made for Chris Berman and vice versa. Time to end both of them.


2009 Topps Juan Castro: Juan Castro ended up back with the Dodgers in 2010 for his third stint with L.A. in his career. He played all of one game for the Dodgers in 2010. Nice night card, though.

OK, it's time to vote. I think the choice is quite easy this time, but I'm not the one voting.

Wait until the next round. Lots of tough choices there.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:


 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …