Skip to main content


(Note: This post appeared today on the Baseball Reference Blog. It's my first contribution to the "Card of the Week" feature).

The design chosen each year for a baseball card set can often determine whether collectors love, hate or remain ambivalent about that set.

One aspect of design is how that design enhances or interferes with the photo on the card.

Some of you might know that the 2008 Topps set was notable for a particular design flaw. The “bump” that featured the Topps logo and jutted into the top portion of the card photo affected how Topps displayed the photos on its cards. Often, the photo images were shrunken so the player’s head would not be covered up by the Topps “bump.”

That particular set got me thinking about whether there were other sets in which the design forced Topps’ hand as to how it displayed its photos. I quickly scanned Topps flagship sets over the years. I found out that, in most sets since Topps went with photography over illustrations, the design has not affected photo selection or positioning of the photo.

An exception is 1969 Topps.

Topps’ decision to superimpose the colored circle, which contained the player’s name and position, onto the photo required a significant adjustment. You can see it with the John Boccabella card. If you removed the colored circle, what would you have? You would have an obvious off-centered photo. In most case, an off-center photo would never fly as a choice for a player’s card.

But for 1969 Topps, an off-center photo was REQUIRED in many cases. I went throught the set again today and there are 77 examples (I may have missed a couple) in which an off-center picture was created so Topps could position the colored circle and not cover up a player’s face.

The ‘69 set had several issues, mostly related to major league baseball expansion that year. Blacked-out caps and hatless players run rampant through the set. But the off-center photo phenomenon was a self-imposed issue.

Topps must have been so scarred by that design flaw that it chose designs that did not interfere with the photo for the next 40 years. Then 2008 came along and the bump reared its ugly head.


  1. While I like the overall design of 2008 Topps, I do now realize that many players are teeny-tiny.

    But would you rather have that, or some of the Stadium Club and Upper Deck photos where you can see the acne scars and nose hairs?

    Tough call, man...

  2. I never thought about it, but you're dead on about the '69 off-centering. Take a look at one of my TTMs...

    Ray is way over to the left. It looks like they probably had a good photo, but then had to crop it so that the yellow circle wouldn't cut off his head.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:

 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …