Skip to main content

Through the years 2

Staying on the topic of player collecting and Clayton Kershaw, here's a somewhat challenging exercise in player collecting that I learned from Brian of Highly Subjective and Completely Arbitrary.

A year-and-half ago I wrote a post about attempting to find a card of Clayton Kershaw in every Topps flagship design, from 1951 to the present. It was my spin-off on his quest to do the same with the now-retired Joe Mauer.

At the time of that post, I had compiled 38 of the Topps flagship designs bearing Kershaw's image.

Since then, obviously, I've added a 2019 Topps design to my Kershaw quest. I also have placed the above card in my COMC cart because it shows him on the 1984 design and I still haven't landed one of those (gee, I wonder why, make a few 100 more insert series, Topps!!!)

But even though the '84 design isn't quite in my collection, I've still managed to add the following designs since I wrote that original post:

1953, 1958, 1970, 1976, 1977, 1978 and 2001.

That's pretty good, considering I haven't been trying all that hard, other than simply wanting every Dodger card I can find.

So let's go through the years again with every design that I own featuring Kershaw. Then I'll whittle down the list to what's left.













































Phew! That was a lot of scanning.

But that gets me to 44 different Topps flagship designs for Kershaw. It will be 45 when the 1984 design arrives.

As you can see, some of the cards don't exactly replicate the original flagship design (looking squarely at you, 1978). I could have mixed it up even more by adding some more parallels and other wackiness. But if I can tell what design is being referenced then that's good enough for me.

Going through these makes me realize again how better Heritage is at producing a quality card than some of the other tributes, such as Archives. That's why when I update this series again as Heritage goes through the '70s, I'll swap out those mini '71 and '72 versions, etc.

So, here is what designs are left on the list:

1954, 1955, 1956, 1973, 1974, 1979, 1981, 1986, 1988, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007.

I'm depending on Archives for a number of these. (Archives let me down by not putting Kershaw on the '73 or '86 design when it had a chance. Same with '93, somewhat). I would think that the '56 design is coming to Archives soon -- unless Topps is afraid of creating a three-cartoon strip for each card.

If I wanted to expand into other non-flagship sets, I could knock off even more years. There is Kershaw on a 1992 Bowman tribute and he appears on several Finest '90s tribute cards. And if you move into Panini territory, there is Kershaw on a 1981 Donruss design.

But I'm going to stick with Topps because that makes most sense to me.

If any of this makes sense.

I'm actually a set collector you know.


Old Cards said…
Fantastic year by year lineup. For a set collector, you sure are putting together a nice player collection. My collection is by year, but I have been thinking about reorganizing it by player lining them up just like you did with your Kershaw cards. This may give me the motivation to do it. Sticking with Topps makes a lot of sense to me.
Chris said…
I'm wondering how long this will take given Topps' habit of recycling the same designs, but I think that there will come a day when one player has a card that represents every flagship set. The '91 Kershaw stands out to me in particular; everything about that card stays true to the original set.
Bo said…
Sure looks like this Kershaw guy has been pitching for a long time. Decades in fact, though he seems to have slowed down over the last couple decades, just popping up occasionally. Kind of a pitching Minnie Minoso I guess.
Brett Alan said…
If they had included him as one of the main players in the 2018 stadium giveaways, instead of making him the 2000s only guy, you'd also have 1994.
Brett Alan said…
I'm pretty sure Mike Trout actually does have a card on every Topps design, thanks to the special subset in Topps Transcendent last year. Of course, the ones in Transcendent are going to be super rare and expensive. Odd note--the 1974 design Trout has the city name space blank, because Topps didn't want to get into whether they're the Los Angeles or Anaheim Angels.
Fuji said…
This is super cool. When things settle down for me, maybe I'll try this project out with Mr. Padre or Rickey.
Lee Hero said…
Amazing idea. Looks like you have a great jump on the Kershaw Topps portfolio. I would think Jackie Robinson or Koufax would have high counts as well.

Popular posts from this blog

The pop culture tax

This isn't really a complaint, just something interesting that I've been noticing.

I'm working on wrapping up a couple of '70s-centric sets right now, getting down to those last 10-20-30 cards, and the usual candidates are being evasive.

I wish I could pick up all the stars early in my set-building quests so the end of the build isn't quite so painful but it never ends up that way. The best of the best usually take the most effort. But I expect that.

What always surprises me is some of the other players that end up being the final few.

Take, for instance, the 1977 Kellogg's set that I'm now trying to complete. I picked up three more cards from that set from Sportlots. The Jose "Cheo" Cruz card was one of them.

The other two were Dodgers, already in my Dodger binders but that doesn't help me complete the set now, does it?

I would've liked to add more with this most recent order but most of the other wants simply weren't available. Here…

Binder, top loader or box?

I want to address two different card package arrivals that don't have much in common other than that one thing that every arriving card package has in common, which is:

How will I store these?

It comes down to three ways: binder, top loader or box.

These means of packaging, storing and presenting are not the same. Ideally, every last card in my collection would be living in a binder. That's my favorite storage method. They're accessible. The cards are presented nicely within. They're very good for categorizing and we card collectors sure do love to categorize. They look good visually when entering the room and when opening the binder.

But I don't have the room for a binder for every card. I can't even process what they would look like. Some edition of "Hoarders," I'm sure.

So the cards that are not deemed "worthy" of a binder -- and, yes, I hate that we're prioritizing like this -- go in a box.

Boxes are for sets that I'm not co…

Yaz, Doc and that other guy

I am not a dedicated player collector because it doesn't fit into how I view baseball and how my collection reflects the history of baseball. Set collecting and team collecting, I believe, do a better job of telling you what's going on in the sport in any given year. And that's important to me.

During my less kind moments, I consider player collecting "stalker-ish," but I do see the value in gathering cards of specific players. I do it myself, but it's a low-key pursuit. There is no drive behind it and no real goals.

The fact is, I do admire certain players instinctively or subconsciously, players who never played for my favorite team.

So, when Jeff of Wax Pack Wonders offered one of his latest giveaways, presented in a very player-collector friendly format, I actually took part, and I didn't pick exclusively Dodgers either.

(Confession time: I didn't pick exclusively Dodgers because my Dodgers collection is a bit, shall we say, "advanced" a…