Skip to main content

Through the years 2


Staying on the topic of player collecting and Clayton Kershaw, here's a somewhat challenging exercise in player collecting that I learned from Brian of Highly Subjective and Completely Arbitrary.

A year-and-half ago I wrote a post about attempting to find a card of Clayton Kershaw in every Topps flagship design, from 1951 to the present. It was my spin-off on his quest to do the same with the now-retired Joe Mauer.

At the time of that post, I had compiled 38 of the Topps flagship designs bearing Kershaw's image.

Since then, obviously, I've added a 2019 Topps design to my Kershaw quest. I also have placed the above card in my COMC cart because it shows him on the 1984 design and I still haven't landed one of those (gee, I wonder why, make a few 100 more insert series, Topps!!!)

But even though the '84 design isn't quite in my collection, I've still managed to add the following designs since I wrote that original post:

1953, 1958, 1970, 1976, 1977, 1978 and 2001.

That's pretty good, considering I haven't been trying all that hard, other than simply wanting every Dodger card I can find.

So let's go through the years again with every design that I own featuring Kershaw. Then I'll whittle down the list to what's left.

1951




1952



1953



1957


1958


1959


1960


1961


1962


1963


1964


1965


1966


1967


1968


1969


1970



1971


1972


1975



1976



1977



1978



1980


1982



1983


1985



1987


1989


1990


1991



2001



2008


2009




2010


2011



2012


2013



2014



2015



2016



2017



2018



2019


Phew! That was a lot of scanning.

But that gets me to 44 different Topps flagship designs for Kershaw. It will be 45 when the 1984 design arrives.

As you can see, some of the cards don't exactly replicate the original flagship design (looking squarely at you, 1978). I could have mixed it up even more by adding some more parallels and other wackiness. But if I can tell what design is being referenced then that's good enough for me.

Going through these makes me realize again how better Heritage is at producing a quality card than some of the other tributes, such as Archives. That's why when I update this series again as Heritage goes through the '70s, I'll swap out those mini '71 and '72 versions, etc.

So, here is what designs are left on the list:

1954, 1955, 1956, 1973, 1974, 1979, 1981, 1986, 1988, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007.

I'm depending on Archives for a number of these. (Archives let me down by not putting Kershaw on the '73 or '86 design when it had a chance. Same with '93, somewhat). I would think that the '56 design is coming to Archives soon -- unless Topps is afraid of creating a three-cartoon strip for each card.

If I wanted to expand into other non-flagship sets, I could knock off even more years. There is Kershaw on a 1992 Bowman tribute and he appears on several Finest '90s tribute cards. And if you move into Panini territory, there is Kershaw on a 1981 Donruss design.

But I'm going to stick with Topps because that makes most sense to me.

If any of this makes sense.

I'm actually a set collector you know.

Comments

  1. Fantastic year by year lineup. For a set collector, you sure are putting together a nice player collection. My collection is by year, but I have been thinking about reorganizing it by player lining them up just like you did with your Kershaw cards. This may give me the motivation to do it. Sticking with Topps makes a lot of sense to me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm wondering how long this will take given Topps' habit of recycling the same designs, but I think that there will come a day when one player has a card that represents every flagship set. The '91 Kershaw stands out to me in particular; everything about that card stays true to the original set.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm pretty sure Mike Trout actually does have a card on every Topps design, thanks to the special subset in Topps Transcendent last year. Of course, the ones in Transcendent are going to be super rare and expensive. Odd note--the 1974 design Trout has the city name space blank, because Topps didn't want to get into whether they're the Los Angeles or Anaheim Angels. https://www.blowoutforums.com/showthread.php?t=1276529

      Delete
  3. Sure looks like this Kershaw guy has been pitching for a long time. Decades in fact, though he seems to have slowed down over the last couple decades, just popping up occasionally. Kind of a pitching Minnie Minoso I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If they had included him as one of the main players in the 2018 stadium giveaways, instead of making him the 2000s only guy, you'd also have 1994.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is super cool. When things settle down for me, maybe I'll try this project out with Mr. Padre or Rickey.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Amazing idea. Looks like you have a great jump on the Kershaw Topps portfolio. I would think Jackie Robinson or Koufax would have high counts as well.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:


 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …