Skip to main content

Mere accumulation

Soon, probably before the year is out, I will have added the 700th different Clayton Kershaw card to my collection.

No, no, please, don't applaud. No, really, it isn't necessary.

It's merely accumulation.

I'll probably make a big deal about card No. 700, or at least make an announcement. But my heart won't be in it.

There really isn't a lot of effort going into accumulating a lot of cards of a certain superstar. Topps makes a lot of cards of certain superstars, a whole bunch of unnecessary cards of superstars. Accumulate to your heart's desire, they're right there for the taking. Throw them in your cart and watch the totals grow. All-Star cards, insert cards, parallel cards, leader cards, online specials, buy, buy, buy.

I'd actually be more impressed if someone collected 700 different cards of someone not so recognized. Say, maybe 700 different cards of Matt Lawton. I'd be kinda awed by that.

This is why I am a set-collector, or at least why I am much more interested in set collecting than player collecting. Set collecting, the actual completion of a large set of hundreds and hundreds of cards, feels like more of an accomplishment than announcing the accumulation of a round number of cards of a certain player. I feel more accomplished when I add that last card into that last slot.

It involves searching for the right card, not just any card with that player's face.

So that's why I am trying to complete many different sets right now, because I need that rush that I just won't get by announcing that a certain card in the near future is my 700th Clayton Kershaw card. (I'm not saying player collecting doesn't contain thrills all its own, I'm just saying it doesn't work for me).

Anyway, the card above is the 689th Kershaw card in my collection. It came from Adam of ARPSmith's Sportscard Obsession. He sent a bunch of 2019 Update Dodgers, including a visual aid for what I just wrote above.

That's essentially the same card of Walker Buehler, but yet I get to write it down as three cards of Walker Buehler in my spreadsheet of Buehler cards.

By the way, I'm up to 66 cards of Buehler, who's been in the league for barely more than two years.

Another example: I have 17 cards of Willie Crawford, who spent 14 years in the majors. I have 79 cards of Carl Crawford, who spent 15 years in the majors.

But you all know that. Bloat is all over the modern hobby and especially Topps Update. Let's see some more Update cards from Adam:

Out of all the Update cards that Adam sent, I'm the most interested in the Russell Martin card because that's what means the most to me from Update -- players featured with their new teams (or in Martin's case, his old team, too). All the rest is just filler. Especially those Home Run Derby cards.

I sure do appreciate someone sending me a 2019 Topps Bellinger card, though. Still trying to get that Series 2 Bellinger!

The stash from Adam leaves me with four more Dodgers Update needs: two classic Update cards (Scott Alexander and Will Smith) and two bloaty bloats (Bellinger checklist and Muncy all-star). Oh, and all those inserts. More bloat.

Adam also sent a few needs from some other sets.

Here is Kershaw card No. 690. A sepia parallel.

His fly is still zipped as it is on his regular Chrome card. You may think, "well, of course it is." But that means you haven't seen the disaster that is Kershaw's 2019 Topps Holiday cards, which show flies zipped or unzipped depending on -- I don't know, what? -- whether they hired the 1989 Fleer employees who worked on the Billy Ripken F-face card? Geez.

Kershaw's 2019 card is something I would like to wish away like his 2019 season.

 Moving on to Legends Bloat. this is a need from 2019 A&G, the Ginter Greats insert set, not to be confused with the Star Signs insert set, which also includes Sandy Koufax.

Unrelated to anything, I now have 206 cards of Koufax, all but 25 issued after his career ended. Even with Koufax, I've reached the mere accumulation stage.

Now we are talking.

It's been quite awhile since I've done anything with my needs from the 93-94 Ted Williams Card Company sets. All of these are from the the 1993 Memories insert set. For the Dodgers in that insert set I need two of each card, since I'm collecting one for my team set needs and one for the actual set.

Check out how large the "B" is on the hats. Gracious.

Instinctively, I felt a rush of satisfaction with those Ted Williams Co. cards that I didn't feel with the Update cards.

Sure, I still want the Update team needs. I always must have my Dodgers, but it underlines how I'm wired.

I want completion over mere accumulation.


Zippy Zappy said…
"Say, maybe 700 different cards of Matt Lawton. I'd be kinda awed by that."

Well it's not quite that but I do have 137 different Luis Torrens cards (not including customs). But yes, I echo your feelings of how cards are merely meant to be consumed and accumulated now more than anything else.
My Buehler PC is up to 33 different.
Fuji said…
I've been in accumulation mode since the 80's. Growing up in that era brainwashed me as a collector. At least you don't have the desire to accumulate multiples. A few weeks ago, I bought 8 copies of the same Ronald Acuna card. It sounds silly saying it... and it looks even sillier typing it out.
David said…
From 1996 to about 2007, I worked on a PC of a favorite player from the late '80s: Wally Joyner. Not quite Lawton-esque but not a superstar either. More than crazy fanhood, I did it more to sample the broad universe of sets, inserts, and parallels of the late '80s and '90s with a thin slice. My collection of Joyners stands at 606 different. I've identified 77 more that I do not have but the collecting drive has waned. It may stay at 606 for a long time!
GCA said…
I kinda feel that way about the new flagship sets. I dutifully build the base and whatever inserts and then never look at them again except to add the final few inserts that elude me annually.
Sets are better for completion, but player collections are better for diversity. Like David above, I started Willie Jones to sample more of the 50's era stuff without having to pay Mickey Mantle prices. The trick is limiting yourself to a finite list, excluding those rare regional issues or anything serial numbered to less than 10.
Yeah, Fuji ~ that is crazy....

P.S. Knock it off "Kelly Cain"

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:

1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…

Gimme that corn and cheese

Someone posted a card on Twitter yesterday that I couldn't quite place for an instant.

It was a card of a bunch of Expos posed together with the sun setting behind them and a wonderfully descriptive logo in the corner. And then I remembered:

Ah, yes, its from my favorite Upper Deck set of all-time, the '93 set.

There were all kinds of crazy, wild things going on inside the 1993 Upper Deck set -- INSIDE, the set, not outside, like today where interesting stuff is reserved for inserts and short-prints. Yes, '93 UD did have inserts, too, but the regular cards, the subset cards (remember those?) were so funky that you barely cared whether you saw the inserts.

"Teammates/Team Stars" is one of the many subsets within '93 Upper Deck. The theme is simple: get some guys together from the same team for a photo and slap a goofy name and logo on the card to sum them up.

Upper Deck did that for every team and made them as staged and dopey as possible.

But I love that stu…