Skip to main content

Yaz, Doc and that other guy


I am not a dedicated player collector because it doesn't fit into how I view baseball and how my collection reflects the history of baseball. Set collecting and team collecting, I believe, do a better job of telling you what's going on in the sport in any given year. And that's important to me.

During my less kind moments, I consider player collecting "stalker-ish," but I do see the value in gathering cards of specific players. I do it myself, but it's a low-key pursuit. There is no drive behind it and no real goals.

The fact is, I do admire certain players instinctively or subconsciously, players who never played for my favorite team.

So, when Jeff of Wax Pack Wonders offered one of his latest giveaways, presented in a very player-collector friendly format, I actually took part, and I didn't pick exclusively Dodgers either.

(Confession time: I didn't pick exclusively Dodgers because my Dodgers collection is a bit, shall we say, "advanced" and the chances of claiming dupes were excellent).

I selected Carl Yastrzemski for one of my choices. Growing up in the '70s, Yaz was the elder statesman on a team that my family followed quite closely. The first Yastrzemski card I ever saw was his glorious 1976 model and there are many tributes to it on this blog. Pulling his card between 1976-83 was always a treat. He was pretty much the Red Sox to me.

Of the handful of Yaz cards Jeff sent me was this Yastrzemski 1990 CMC Collect-A-Book. I love these and they don't receive enough praise and adoration.

The Collect-A-Books were everything you wished your card could be. It included a variety of information on that player in a variety of styles.


Open the first page of the book and you receive the player's full name, a team logo, an action cut-out and profile cut-out and vital stats. Plus that gleaming red background.



On pages 4 and 5 is a lengthy biography, career highlights and an action shot. Is that Yaz with a mustache?



Page 6 includes complete career statistics!



Page 7 features yet another photo and lucky Gene Kirby Jr. gets in a Collect-a-Book. The book also includes a message from Yaz and his signature. No, Yaz is not recommending you charge the mound.



The back cover showcases a cartoon by well-known sports cartoonist Kenneth Vandervoort. I like the back covers to these Collect-a-Books. For my Dodgers, I try to collect two versions so I can store one with the cover facing out and one with the cartoon facing out.

All right, that's a lot on just one card and I didn't even discuss how they were made. Fortunately, the SABR card blog can take care of that for you.



Those are the more conventional Yaz cards that arrived. The Diamond King is from 1983 Donruss. For my money only the '82 and '83 Donruss Diamond King sets are worth my hard-earned cash.

Also, don't freak out, the other card is not a pristine copy of the original '61 Yaz card.


It's a card your mom threw out.

It's been a long time since I added any card to my 2010 Topps binder.

OK, I could go on and on about Yaz, but there are two other players I selected in Jeff's giveaway so let's get to those.


Second admired non-Dodger player is Dwight Gooden.

I have no choice in the matter. Gooden debuted in striking fashion when I was 19 years old (Gooden and I are the same age). You get attached to young players like that when you're that age. And I've always loved dominating pitchers. Nobody dominated like Gooden did in 1985.

The Mets of those days went head-to-head with the Dodgers in many important games and I'm happy to say the Dodgers came out on top in many of the biggest. But the days that Gooden started were always scary. I'm just happy he never no-hit my team.


A couple more Goodens, one from 1993 Pacific and one a Broder card from 1989. These are perfect. I was half afraid I'd get a Yankee Gooden card.

OK, now for the guy I actually come the closest to player-collecting.





I couldn't avoid every Dodger on Jeff's list! I wouldn't be able to forgive myself if I passed up on a free Kershaw card that I needed.

It turns out I had three of the four cards sent but the last one is a new one! Yay!

Assembling some key players from other teams is fun, but I don't have a dedicated place for them like I do for my sets or team sets. I'll never create a binder titled "These Are Guys I Like" or anything like that. Instead, they'll probably go in a box with their respective set.

Maybe one day I'll create a page of nine for every key player from the '70s and '80s. OK, now that's a good idea. I like that one.

Let me file it behind the 48 other collecting tasks I have.

Comments

Elliptical Man said…
Voting for the Yaz DK.

bbcardz said…
That card with an image of Kershaw and Marichal disturbs me.
Glad you liked the cards! Honored by an entire post centered around them! Those Collect-a-books are great, aren't they?
Coming from a guy with a 1000+ PC guys, in addition to set building and team collecting I don't seek them (PC guys) out either. When I'm digging through dime boxes, I pull them, and I haven't done that in 6 months. And yeah, those guys are in my PC, lol.
Old Cards said…
Yaz! What a great choice. I followed his career and collected his cards during the 60's. I agree with you on player collections, but Yaz is an exception for me as well and as a result, I have many of his cards from the 70's and 80's, which I have added to my 60's cards of him from my childhood.
Commishbob said…
Yaz is one of those guys that seems to be universally liked by fans. Him, Brooks Robinson, Hank Aaron, Al Kaline...you'd never hear an unkind thing either from them or about them. The '60 Yaz is my favorite card in that set I think.
Billy Kingsley said…
People like you and I who collect the sports, rather than just one person or team, are technically player collecting everyone in that sport. I do three sports, and yes, I must be crazy.
Nick said…
Those Collect-A-Books are legendary to me, because they combine my two favorite hobbies: cards & books!
Chris said…
Excellent player choices, I would have considered all three myself. Kershaw is one of a dozen non-Red Sox I collect, though I'm not much of a player PC collector.

I enjoyed the Collect-A-Books as a kid and it was fun to rediscover them recently.
Fuji said…
A. I love those Collect-A-Books. I've accumulated both of the MLB sets. I'd love to eventually collect the other sports too and display them in a binder for easy access.

B. I was just thinking about doing a Page of Nine project with my Oakland A's and San Diego Padres PC's... where I pick my nine favorite cards of a player and put them into a 9-pocket page.
Card bubbles said…
Collect a books are also a favorite of mine

Popular posts from this blog

The slash era

I'm not sure how many images of Joe Adell on the 2021 Topps design you have seen already. At the moment of this writing (3:42 p.m.), I've seen it several times, as well as a couple of blog posts about it. I'm sure there are more on the way.

These are what people are saying about it ...

Wait, I suppose I need to show you the image one more time:


There you are.

OK, now, the first reference I saw to it when I woke up out of my nest late this morning is that the design has a border. This was met with applause and I'm right there with them. It's the first Topps bordered flagship set since 2015, although you could make a case for 2019.

There is a lot of tinkering with the border but that just continues the theme of the entire design, which is: IT'S AWFULLY BUSY, AIN'T IT?????

How many design elements are on that card? Ten? Twelve? Fifteen? (Also, purple? There is no purple in the Angels color scheme. Are we going back to the random Topps colors of the '60s, …

The weird things collectors do

It is interesting to me how card collectors seem to have so much in common, as far as interests, personality tendencies, how their brains are wired, etc., and still can be so different.

There are many things that card collectors do that confuse the heck out of me. ... Why? Why would they do that? ... And there are many ways card collectors think that don't match my collecting thought process at all.

I think the influence of the time period in which a collector grew up has a lot to do with the differences. And that's what I'm going to chalk up to the excuse I am now giving to whatever lost soul decided to grade a 1982 Topps Burt Hooton card.

Let's go through the reasons why there's no need to grade a 1982 Topps Burt Hooton:

1. The card came out in 1982.
2. It's Burt Hooton.

I'm done.

But, I'm thinking, somebody grew up in a period when everyone was grading cards and that, yes, even commons should be graded because, you know, they could, uh ... they coul…

Thrill of the chase

An old high school classmate asked me this week how to go about selling some completed Topps baseball sets that she had purchased for her sons each year while they were growing up.

I explained how to search for the sets on eBay by using the completed listings option, but because she is one of my favorite former classmates, to help lessen the shock for her, I searched the sets myself and then gave her an average for each of them, along with an explanation of why they weren't worth much more than what she had paid for them originally.

The sets were from 1997-2008 and with the exception of the 2001 set, which at 790 cards is the largest of the bunch and also contains the Ichiro rookie card, it was clear that nobody values completed sets anymore. At least not non-vintage completed sets.

I already knew this. But seeing it underlined in back-lit numbers stunned me a bit. The 2005 complete set sells for only 40 bucks? I like the 2005 set! I'm trying to complete the 2005 set! Why don…