Skip to main content

Updating before Update

This is me being picky, but if you've read this blog long enough you know that I tend to be picky. And yet you still read this thing ...

I just finished cataloging the Series 1 and Series 2 base cards that I have from 2013 Topps. It is usually at this time that I find whatever weirdness I overlooked when I was originally pulling cards out of packs.

Often, I'll come across something that boggles my mind. Like last year when I found a Wade Davis card in each series even though he didn't change teams, wasn't a star, or hadn't won any awards that would merit a second card. Just two Wade Davis cards for no apparent reason.

And there's been previous examples of that as I mentioned on that post, and others mentioned in the comments.

I didn't find anything like that this time, although it's still possible as I don't have all the cards in the set. What I did find was this Josh Johnson card in Series 2.

His base card pops up in Series 2 even though he already had a base card in Series 1:

This is card #255. The Blue Jays Johnson is card #473.

Now, I suppose there is justification for the second card because Johnson changed teams last offseason, so why not get him a card with his new team, right? Upper Deck did this quite often when it was issuing baseball sets.

But Upper Deck's sets were like 1,000 cards. They could do stuff like that. Topps is still refusing to issue cards of long relievers and backup catchers, yet we need an updated Josh Johnson card -- before Topps issues a card set called ... UPDATE.

The better thing to have done, of course, is not issue an outdated card of Johnson in Series 1 and just wait until Series 2 to issue the Johnson card (I know Topps must plan ahead with sets and maybe they couldn't pull the Marlin Johnson in time, but really there has to be a better way to do this).

Issuing a second Johnson card as a Blue Jay just looks panicky. Isn't this what the Update set is for? And how goofy does it look now that Johnson is a Padre? The rush to get him in Series 2 now seems pointless.

Yes, I'm being picky and asking for rigid definitions, like the way things were back in the day, when the way of card sets these days is to issue cards of squirrels and super shortprints and anything goes as long as we get our cash!

Sorry. I just like updated cards to be in Update.

Here's another example:

That's Michael Bourn with his old team and Michael Bourn with his new team.

Yet there they are BOTH IN SERIES 2.

One is not his base card. The card on the left is one of those extra "why is this card in the set when my favorite guy off the bench isn't" cards. Cool photo, without a doubt, but pretty much frivolous.

But it's very weird that there are two cards of Bourn in the same series with him wearing different uniforms.

I know Update these days is for five different cards of Strasburg-Harper-Puig and All-Star cards. But I miss when the Update set was for when you waited for guys in their new uniforms mixed in with some rookies.

I know, I know. It's not 1983 anymore.

Just me being picky.

Carry on.


Not to mention the 2012 Update card of Matt Albers, showing him with the Red Sox, even though he had been traded to Arizona at the trade deadline.
Even funnier is the fact that this is his only Topps card showing him with the Red Sox even though he had been on the team since the 2011 season and even pitched in 56 games that year.
hiflew said…
This isn't great, but it is better than in 2011 with two Jason Hammel "base" cards in Series 2, both with the Rockies. Not to mention the two appearances of Rafael Betancourt in 2013. He is in Series 2 and in Update, both with the Rockies and to make it worse the pictures are just about identical. Topps just doesn't even care, but I guess it has been that way for years now.
Don said…
At least they did not follow the example of 2007 Gary Sheffield. There is the EXACT same card in series 1& 2'
If you got a double of that Braves Born card, I'll take it. LOL
Fuji said…
You sir are the cardboard professor. It's amazing the stuff you come up with. Keep 'em coming sir. You can be as picky as you want when you're handing out awesome information like this.
Anonymous said…
I would really prefer they did the s1 and s2 cards in the player's uniform from the previous year, and any changes in update. That was always what Update was for. But that's probably just me being old and stodgy.

The Bourn card makes sense to me because it's a subset showing him winning Defensive POY. It makes sense they put him in his old uniform for the subset - he won the award with the Braves. But I wish he didn't have an Indians card until Update anyways.

I also wish the subsets looked different from the base set. I'd still incorporate pieces of the base design, but do something more to make them stand out!

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Return of the king

(If you haven't voted for your favorite Bert Campaneris '70s card in the last post, I invite you to do so).

So you've been away for a few years and want everyone to know that you're back.

How do you do that?

Do what The Diamond King did when he returned to card blogging last month: Bombard readers with contests and giveaways! Well, you've certainly gotten MY attention, sir!

I'll start with the giveaways first. Since he returned, the Diamond King has issued multiple "Diamond King 9" giveaways, straight out of the chute and rapid fire in the last month-plus. As I've said before, I am very slow to get to these "first come, first serve" giveaways. I used to think "I spend too much time on the computer" and now I realize "I don't spend enough time on the computer at all!"

But I was able to nab two cards out of the many giveaways.

I won this key 1981 Fleer Star Sticker of The Hawk. I have since acquired several more &#…