Skip to main content

Awesome night card, pt. 112


I have a soft spot for players who help the National League win the All-Star Game. You won't catch me saying anything nasty about Gary Carter, George Foster, Ken Griffey (Sr., not Jr.) or Sandy Alomar Jr.

That is why even though Marlon Byrd and Brian McCann each play for teams that I am sick to death of -- Byrd for the Cubs and McCann for the Braves -- they get a pass, because they have helped accomplish what must be done to maintain balance in the galaxy -- ensure that the N.L. wins the freaking game.

It is also why I give Byrd a pass even though he was the elusive last card in Series 1 of the 2009 Topps set. I can't stay mad when I see a replay of his throw to eliminate David Ortiz at second base last year. Also, that card happens to be a night card (he may also be on a night card in the 2010 set, but it is much too difficult to tell).

But, unfortunately, Marlon, it is time to say farewell. Even after that scary as hell beaning.


I traded away my Marlon Byrd Diamond Diecut card yesterday. It just wasn't doing what I wanted it to do. I wanted to obtain a Dodger Diamond Diecut for the card, but even when I packaged it with some other cards (decent stuff -- not late '80s cards), I couldn't get anyone to budge. As usual, they never decline the trade, they just let it die on the vine for a week.

After several of these attempts, I realized it wasn't going to happen, so I swapped it for this:


I probably could have done a little better, but I absolutely love this card. It's my favorite 1962 Dodger card. In a set that is plagued by head shots, you have to appreciate the wind-up pose. I also greatly enjoy that Sherry is wearing the customary jacket under his uniform, and the light tower framing the photo. Plus, I have a thing for 1959 World Series heroes.

After redeeming FOUR diamond diecut cards, I just didn't value Byrd like the others. It's difficult to do that when the others are Jackie Robinson (by way of Babe Ruth), Reggie Jackson and Roy Halladay.

Halladay was already dealt for some key Dodger vintage, which leaves me with two diamond diecuts.


I just put in my order for the Jackie Robinson card. After turning down countless offers for this card, I determined that there is no way I'm ever going to trade it. So I will gladly await its arrival and anticipate it dazzling me with its diamond display. I will expect nothing less. If the mail carrier is not wearing sunglasses, I will be shipping an email to Topps.


I am leaving Reggie Jackson in the portfolio for now. I don't anticipate trading it, but he's not a Dodger, so anything can happen. And by "anything" I don't mean that I trade it for a 1987 card and two 1988 cards. I can't even count the number of offers like this that I have received for this card, and I haven't even owned it for a week.

I have a dozen cards in my portfolio right now and I like all of them. They all are either Dodgers I need, or cards from sets that I need, or the diecut thingies. Even though you get dozens of insulting trades a day on this thing, it is very easy to trade for cards you want and get rid of cards you don't. At least it is for me. Anytime I redeem something I have already, I don't hang on to it for long, and I obtain something I want.

Maybe that's because I'm willing to end up with the "lesser" deal in the trade as long as I get something that satisfies my interest. That's why I ended up with the Sherry card for the Byrd diecut. Maybe some see it as a steal for the trader who received Byrd, but I don't look at it in those terms. There is no one upmanship.

The majority of card bloggers understand this concept and they make up the best set of traders I have ever encountered. But the majority of Diamond Giveaway participants still have the collecting brain of a 12-year-old and desperately need to announce to someone "look who I ripped off!"

Such a pleasant character trait.

Another good thing about the Diamond Giveaway: I don't have to see these kind of traders face-to-face.

So long, Marlon. You've done your duty. Just like you did last July.

Comments

A2 Wolverine said…
Last years contest sucked compared to this year. I've managed to get quite a few cards I've wanted. Whatdya say a few 90's and 74 Yankees team pose for the Reggie? Only kidding.
I agree. The diamond giveaway is much better.
AdamE said…
I have 65 virtual cards right now and only 3 new Red Sox. 24 of them are pre 1980 and I can't get anyone to accept a trade for a Red Sox I don't have. I always try to give older cards for newer and it isn't working.
AdamE said…
I have completed 28 trades though. Anytime someone offers me a card from the same year or newer I take it even if not a Red Sox. I figure a 70s card is better trade bait for 70s Red Sox than an 87 Topps. But than again my virtual stack isn't really growing. All in all not bad for only redeeming one single code.
vio789 said…
Hey would you make a trade for some 1990 Dodgers?

1990 Topps-Ramon Martinez
1990 Donruss-Alejandro Pena,Franklin Stubbs, Stanley Crews,Michael Hatcher Jr.,Willy Randolph,and Lenny Harris

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Selfless card acts

The trouble with the world, if I may be so bold to weigh in (it's not like anyone else is holding back), is that not enough people think outward.

Take a look at just about every world problem that there is, and within each of those individual maelstroms, is somebody, usually a lot of folks, thinking only of themselves.

Looking out for No. 1 is a big, big problem on this earth. One of the biggest. And it's not getting better. I see it coming from all directions and all sides. No one is innocent. Everyone is guilty. Selfishness is the crime.

Our hobby is not immune. That's what makes the baseball card blog community so great, because it's a daily example of what can be achieved when you think of others first, before yourself.

Selflessness is such a staple of card blogs that some collectors have become immune to its charms. "Oh boy, here's another post about what somebody got thanks to the goodness of someone's heart. I don't need to read THAT." I a…