Skip to main content

Set devotion

I admire a collector's devotion toward a set more than any other kind of dedication in our hobby. As someone who came from the golden years of set collecting (1950s-late 1980s), I understand that kind of collecting, that kind of enthusiasm better than any other pursuit.

Then there are people who take that set devotion and advance it, and that's when I think ... "how do they have the time?"

OK, I'm also impressed with that, too.

Jeremy of Topps Cards That Never Were and Completing The 1992 Topps Set has demonstrated that kind of drive with the '92 blog. He has created a custom card of every player who appeared in a major league game in 1991 and is showing them on his blog. That is some kind of set devotion. I don't ever see myself doing the same thing with the 1975 Topps set.

The '92 set is Jeremy's favorite and I've got to admit it's a pretty good one, although it does mark Topps' departure from traditional card stock, and, oh, what a tangled web we're in now.

Recently, he printed out some of his creations and offered to send the Dodgers to me. I gladly accepted and now I have custom cards of players like John Wetteland and Mike Christopher and Dennis Cook, who never appeared in the '92 Topps set (some appeared in the traded or MLB debut sets).


Pretty happy to have a Butch Davis Dodgers card. The former Royal from the mid-1980s played in a single game for the Dodgers in 1991.


As you can see, he produced backs with numbering and everything. I can't imagine what goes into getting all that stuff right, fonts and all.

Look! He even made coach cards!

Jeremy said he's still working on the printing process, but in the meantime I'll be adding these to my new custom cards binder that I believe I mentioned recently. I've received so many over the years that they deserve their own enshrinement.

Jeremy added one more card to the package that he didn't make.

The is a former Nebulous 9 need. The last Dodgers cyberstats parallel card from the 1995 Topps set that I needed to complete the set. I now know how all of the 1994 Dodgers would have done if the season was completed according to some computer program from late '94/early '95!

By the 1990s, the number of collectors devoted to sets had dwindled because of inventions like above. I suppose it's all part of the evolution of things, but I miss the days when every collector I knew was devoted toward the same set. Things are much more fractured.

But as long as we have some people out there still focused on one set, like Jeremy, it will be all right.


Mike Matson said…
Those customs are really cool.. Jeremy does a good job.
Tony Burbs said…
Fantastic work - he even nailed the photo selections, which look like the imagery that was scattered through the real set. This guy knows his stuff!
Fuji said…
Very cool customs. It's truly a good thing that I have no idea how to mess with images and fonts, because there are just way too many custom cards I can envision making. I'll just leave it up to the experts like Jeremy.
Anonymous said…
That is a very dedicated level of attention and devotion to creating customs. Can't imagine the time and commitment to finding every image...not to mention the stats on the back!!!
ketchupman36 said…
92 Topps is a great looking set and he did a nice job with his customs
Jeremya1um said…
Thanks for all the compliments, and Greg thanks for posting them. Fuji-let me know any customs you can come up with and I'll see what I can do. Karensjer at gmail dot com

Popular posts from this blog

A friend indeed

This week has been the kind of week that only late January could produce.

Nothing particularly wrong or terrible happened. Mostly what I felt this week was a sense of spinning my wheels, of working hard without result (or with other people screwing it up), of trying to get things accomplished (while battling a sinus infection) only to have a car noise or a phone call knock me back to square one.

That feeling transferred over to the blog where I probably spent too much time uploading too many photos and conducting too much research and expecting too much in return.

But all of this is a phase. It's the January malaise. I'll snap out of it. It could be worse. I could be dealing with three feet of snow right now instead of the melting three inches that is out there.

And I could be struggling through this week without an envelope in the mail from "A Friend".

That's right, "A Friend".

That's how the return address appeared on the envelope. Just above th…

Degrees of doneness

I just wrapped up my first notable card purchase of 2020.

It was an online order -- from three of every collector's favorite card-buying sites -- and with the exception of three inserts from 2019 and a stray card from 1989, every single card I ordered was made prior to 1980.

That feels good. That feels tremendously good.

I'm starting off 2020 in the right frame of mind.

It's also a good way to put a cork in the 2019 collecting season. There are various ways you can say you're done with the cards from the previous year, call it degrees of doneness, if you will (I order steaks "medium" or "medium well," I don't need anything crawling off my plate).

1. You can be done with collecting sets from 2019. I'm certainly done with that. I didn't try to collect many sets from that year anyway. The 2019 Topps Holiday set and a third of the 2019 Topps Archives set are finished and that's everything I plan to do.

2. You can be done with buying pac…

The lone Ranger

Who is Nick Solak?

Glad you asked.

And thanks to cynicalbuddha for scanning his card into Trading Card Database.

Nick Solak is a former Yankees, former Rays prospect who appeared in 33 games for the Texas Rangers last year.

That, apparently, qualifies him for being the only Texas Ranger to appear in the 350-card base set for 2020 Topps Series 1, a checklist of which was released this morning.

That's right, the ONLY Texas Ranger.

I did the count and the Rangers, with Solak shouldering the entire load, come up a distant 30th behind the 29th-place Orioles, who have a more typical seven cards.

Here is the breakdown by team that I compiled earlier:

Dodgers - 17
Astros - 17
Nationals - 16
Cubs - 15
Athletics - 14
Brewers - 14
Indians - 14
White Sox - 14
Phillies - 13
Angels - 12
Blue Jays - 12
Braves - 12
Padres - 12
Red Sox - 12
Reds - 12
Twins - 12
Yankees - 12
Cardinals - 11
Giants - 11
Marlins - 11
Mets - 11
Diamondbacks - 10
Mariners - 10
Rays - 10
Tigers - 10
Royals - 9
Pirates -…