Skip to main content

Another relic card I don't need

I've talked about paring down my collection of Dodger relics for years now. I've done some trimming, holding a couple of giveaways. But I'm almost to the point where I want to keep what I have, at least for now.

Every once in awhile, though, a relic card emerges from the walk-in safe downtown where I keep my relics (What? You don't do the same?), and I think, "why the heck do I have this thing?"

In fact, it happened several weeks ago with one of them.

But it took me coming across another card first. It was this card:

This is a gold-bordered parallel from 2001 Topps Archives, which is a retro-reprint set. The Archives card is paying tribute to Shawn Green's initial Topps appearance in a base set, which happened in 1992.

The card is replicating this card:

Green appeared in the Draft Picks subset in 1992 as the Blue Jays' No. 1 pick in 1991. So this is a Blue Jays card.

But I don't own Green's '92 card (the above is filched scan) and was only vaguely aware of it. And that bit of unfamiliarity allowed me to keep the following card in my Dodgers' relic collection:

This is from 2003 Topps Gallery. It's a "painted" rendition of Green's Draft Picks card with a relic swatch included.

Green was an established Dodger in 2003, one of the stars of the game at that point. Both the Dodgers and Blue Jays wear blue caps, and, silly me, I just thought it was issued in 2003, so it's a Dodger card.

However, nowhere on this card is there mention of a team affiliation. And there is no date attribution for the relic either. It could be a Dodger relic or a Blue Jays relic. Who knows? They both wear white jerseys! Yay! Topps bringing you closer to the game as vaguely as possible!

So with almost no knowledge to go on, I must go with my own ranking determination system, which I just made up right now on the spot. I must return to the front of the card.

The picture on this card is taken from a Blue Jays card. I can make no determination about the relic because Topps didn't tell me anything about it. And there's nothing mentioned about a team on this entire piece of cardboard. Therefore, it's a Blue Jays card.

It doesn't belong with a Dodger fan. It belongs with a Blue Jays fan. And it will end up with a Jays fan.

I probably should look at the accuracy of some of my other Dodger relics now. I'll likely be down to 5 cards after that.


Mike Matson said…
That's rather odd that they wouldn't put a team affiliation on the 2003 card.
I always did find that Green Draft Pick card confusing.. lol
CrazieJoe said…
The draft pick card picture does leave it nicely open to interpretation with the blue cap - and using the pic in 2003 with no team clarification on the card is just annoying.
Robert said…
the Night Owl has a walk in safe full of cards....

Yeah, I can picture that
Stack22 said…
That's actually a patch of jersey from a SUNY-Oneanta intermural softball game.
Fuji said…
Interesting design. There's so much space in the bottom part of the card (the gray area)... it's funny that Topps chose to cover up part of Shawn's face with the relic swatch.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Return of the king

(If you haven't voted for your favorite Bert Campaneris '70s card in the last post, I invite you to do so).

So you've been away for a few years and want everyone to know that you're back.

How do you do that?

Do what The Diamond King did when he returned to card blogging last month: Bombard readers with contests and giveaways! Well, you've certainly gotten MY attention, sir!

I'll start with the giveaways first. Since he returned, the Diamond King has issued multiple "Diamond King 9" giveaways, straight out of the chute and rapid fire in the last month-plus. As I've said before, I am very slow to get to these "first come, first serve" giveaways. I used to think "I spend too much time on the computer" and now I realize "I don't spend enough time on the computer at all!"

But I was able to nab two cards out of the many giveaways.

I won this key 1981 Fleer Star Sticker of The Hawk. I have since acquired several more &#…