Skip to main content

Debate this

There is a contest about who can act more presidential taking place on television tonight.

In case you haven't noticed, I detest politics, and I detest even more people getting animated about politics. So I'm steering very clear of anything that has to do with the words "debate," "moderator," or "let me finish."

But I know how some people must have things to discuss and questions to answer, so I'll throw this out to you:

I received this Starting Lineup card of Fernando Valenzuela from Classon Ave. a little while ago. It was part of a package of Dodgers and oddballs, which are really the best kind of packages -- there's no debate about that.

Now, the whole Starting Lineup craze did not land in my wheelhouse. When kids were playing with their little SLU figurines, I was figuring out how anyone expected me to attend my 9 a.m. law of mass communication class if the bar was open until 4 a.m. Near as I know, there were little plastic athletic figures that came with accompanying cards.

I've managed to acquire some of the cards over the years through trades, and I'm not too impressed with their quality to be honest. Some are all right. Some are awful. The Fernando from 1988 is on the higher end of the scale. Flimsy, but serviceable.

So, I was shocked when I happened upon this same Fernando Starting Lineup card selling on Check Out My Cards for 20 dollars.

20 BUCKS? For this?

A quick ebay search put my mind a little more at ease as there's a BIN Fernando for $4.50. But even that seems a little high to me. Are Starting Lineup cards that valued?

That's what I'd like you to debate. Or, clue in the clueless collector, if you prefer. Why so much for such an unimpressive piece of cardboard?

And, why particularly, so much for the Valenzuela? The other '88 Starting Lineup cards on COMC go for not even a quarter of the Fernando.

I suppose with all those questions I just posed, that makes me the "moderator" of this "debate."


Let me finish.

While you're mulling that over, here are some other cards sent by Classon Ave:

Your average oddball from the late '80s.

Even more Karim Garcia cards from 1996. I'm now over the 30 mark for Karim and '96.

The Target '51-style Robinson card from a couple years ago. I had forgotten all about needing this item.

I'm thinking I was sent this card because of this post, in which I said I had no Yankee card of Spike Owen. I'll have to update the post now (yeah, like that will happen).

Finally, a couple of Chunichi Dragons cards. The Dragons were known for years for wearing their Dodger-inspired uniforms. I think they have different uniforms now.

This is from some Baseball Card Magazine issue from 1992. I have no idea what it is beyond that.

Feel free to debate exactly what that is, too.

While you're debating, I'll be over here, drinking a beer.

And watching baseball.

Not that other talky thing.


Mark Kaz said…
Love those Japanese cards! Classon Ave. is the Man when it comes to oddball issues.
Like anything else for sale, the prices vary greatly. It would probably be easy to get the 1988 Valenzuela figure, card and original package for about $4.50. Even though I like the SLU's I find them at shows for $1 in the package.

I agree about the debate. Our only debate tonight is about Cabrera and the triple crown.
dogfacedgremlin said…
There was a big deal made about the "scarcity" of some of the SLUs back in the day, especially with the '88, '89, and '90 issues. That played true across the board for the the basketball and football ones. I don't know if that is the reason for the higher price tag or not but I can tell you that from going to shows in the Chicago area, SLUs as a whole group have been devalued worse than the peso.
Nick B. said…
For some reason there is a John Paxson (with a mustache!) SLU that has been in my parent's garage for years, and every time I go over there it's in a different, random spot.
JediJeff said…
I have this starting LineUp of Jordan vs. Thomas, with the two cards, loose.

Is it REALLY worth $65? Damn....
Spiegel83 said…
The Dragons are my team. Hahaha! I saw them play when I was in Japan 6-7 years ago. There uniforms weren't Dodger like back then. That is a shame.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Selfless card acts

The trouble with the world, if I may be so bold to weigh in (it's not like anyone else is holding back), is that not enough people think outward.

Take a look at just about every world problem that there is, and within each of those individual maelstroms, is somebody, usually a lot of folks, thinking only of themselves.

Looking out for No. 1 is a big, big problem on this earth. One of the biggest. And it's not getting better. I see it coming from all directions and all sides. No one is innocent. Everyone is guilty. Selfishness is the crime.

Our hobby is not immune. That's what makes the baseball card blog community so great, because it's a daily example of what can be achieved when you think of others first, before yourself.

Selflessness is such a staple of card blogs that some collectors have become immune to its charms. "Oh boy, here's another post about what somebody got thanks to the goodness of someone's heart. I don't need to read THAT." I a…