Skip to main content

The best holiday in February

 
February is filled with somewhat sketchy holidays.
 
I'll start with Groundhog Day, which is about good for rewatching a movie. Valentine's Day is often derided as a "Hallmark Holiday." The weeklong "Winter Break" mostly recognized by schools, morphed from single days recognizing presidents into a 5-day celebration of ... um ... winter, I guess? Then there's the Super Bowl, which is fine for the food. The teams are usually gross.
 
The best holiday in February, by far, is when Topps Series One is discovered on store shelves, a.k.a. "the first cards of the season." 
 
On that day I see something I don't see the rest of the year: card shelves fully stocked with current baseball product at the local big-box. I'm referring to Target because Walmart is in a current state of baseball card indifference (I did find a 2025 Topps Holiday tin hiding in the back of a shelf at Walmart a couple weeks ago). 
 
So it was yesterday when I was out celebrating another February holiday (Valentine's), made possible by another February holiday (Winter Break), at a restaurant that was in the same shopping complex as the local Target. I know I said I had no real desire to find 2026 Topps but when you're in the neighborhood, what kind of collector would I be to not check it out?
 
And I was rewarded with the above display. That's not even all of it. There were 2026 Winter Olympic boxes, too, which I actually considered but put down because of how light the box felt in my hand.
 
I hadn't seen such a packed display since at least last February. (This same area will be desolate by June). So I picked up a blaster.
 
Now, let's get some the ugliness out of the way because this is a holiday and it's rude to rain on someone's holiday fun.
 

Here is a box of 2026 Topps Series One next to a box of 2025 Topps Update. Scroll your eyes down to the bottom where it mentions how many cards are in each box. The Update box says "7 packs of 12 cards". The Series One box reads "6 packs of 12 cards." So 84 cards down to 72 -- 12 cards less for the same price.
 
I don't normally keep old blaster boxes so I don't have anything from near recent times to illustrate how much Fanatics enjoys ripping off its customers, but I do have one from 11 years ago.
 
 

The card count on this 2015 box is up at the top because Topps wasn't ashamed to reveal the content count then. Ten packs of 10 cards each or 100 cards, plus a medallion card that nobody wanted but still 101 cards for $20 bucks, not $25!
 
So, yes, today's cards are not cost-friendly and I was aware of it immediately when I opened the 2026 box and counted six packs.
 
Still, this is only an issue on any other day of the year except the holiday of The First Cards of the Season. I don't plan to keep buying blasters or any other 2026 Topps packaging configuration throughout the year. If I was, then maybe you could pry into my finances and ask what the hell I'm doing. But one time on the holiday, what's the harm in that? Yeah, I know cards should be about 10 cents per instead of 34 cents per (eep!) but why crab about that on the holiday? I'M OPENING MY GIFTS HERE!!! 
 
 
 
So, let's open them.
 
 
PACK ONE
 

183 - Josh Lowe, Rays
67 - Parker Messick, Guardians (RC)
133 - Ben Rice, Yankees
213 - Colby Thomas, Athletics (RC)
5 - Nico Hoerner, Cubs
108 - Swayer Gipson-Long, Tigers
326 - Jonathan Aranda, Rays
309 - Kyle Manzardo, Guardians
226 - Ben Williamson, Mariners
TOG-19 - Fernando Tatis, Padres, Titans of the Game
T91-55 - Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Dodgers, 1991-themed insert
117 - NL Wins Leaders, spring training parallel (blaster exclusive)
 
Let's take a look at the first card of the year:
 

First off, it's someone I've actually heard of, which is not a guarantee as veteran readers will know from my past opening-day pack rips.
 
Second, I've grown to like the design rather than be merely indifferent to it. I'd say it's my second favorite flagship design of the 2020s. The stitching theme has been covered before but I think what tilted me toward appreciating it is that it has a "panel of a comic page" vibe. The player lettering specifically brought that home to me. I wish I could find an exact example (it's one of those things I know I've seen in the past).
 

This 1979 Topps Comic is not the best comparison but the lettering used for Nolan Ryan's name is kind of similar and why I am associating the 2026 design with comic panels.
 
Another plus is that the design allows for aspects of the photo to break through, such as Lowe's bat. I'm glad this is continuing and that it's back in style.  
 
 

The back.
 
Standard effort that resembles mostly the past 25 years. I appreciate that it's fairly readable.
 
A couple other thoughts from the first pack:
 
1. The Titans of the Game inserts look nice but I don't know how that's different from the Stars of the Game insert that keeps reappearing though I'm beyond sick of it.
2. Too many guys I don't know, but you've heard that from me before and I'll bring it up again.
 
Now this: 
 

This 1991-themed card is the only Dodger I pulled out of the whole blaster (yet Rays and Marlins galore). While it's a nice grab (I'm still trying to finish the 1990 Dodgers from last year), the leg traveling out of the frame is weird. I don't remember that happening in 1991 Topps.
 
 
PACK TWO
 

76 - Jacob Lopez, Athletics
82 - Carlos Rodon, Yankees
201 - Kyle Teel, White Sox (RC)
207 - Joey Bart, Pirates
13 - Dylan Smith, Tigers (RC)
281 - Davis Martin, White Sox
172 - Maximo Acosta, Marlins (RC)
128 - Felix Bautista, Orioles
322 - Trea Turner, Phillies
55 - Warming Bernabel, Rockies (RC)
174 - Tyler Stephenson, Reds
SMLB-28 - Kyle Teel, White Sox, Stars of MLB (RC)
 
The nadir of the box. There are five guys I've heard of in this pack. There are four rookie cards and two of the same rookie (who is definitely not a "Star of MLB"). Topps/Fanatics pushing rookies continues to be at an all-time high and I would take this as a sign that I'm not that into baseball but I follow it much more than the average fan. I have an MLB-TV subscription, watch odd match-ups all the time and also have a job that keeps me involved in the current game. SO WHO ARE THESE GUYS THAT YOU MADE UP, TOPPS???
 
One other design mention. Some have pointed out the three-letter team abbreviations at the top as redundant given the team logo at the bottom. I don't mind that. I do mind it on Athletics cards, though. Squeezing in "Athletics" into that space is dumb. Just make it ATH. Is there some sort of ridiculous copyright rule that prevents that from happening?
 
 
PACK THREE
 

118 - "Hopping To It", Braves
271 - Reid Detmers, Angels
28 - Elias Diaz, Padres
38 - Andry Lara, Nationals (RC)
171 - Will Benson, Reds
48 - Grant Taylor, White Sox (RC)
348 - Michael Busch, Cubs
119 - Nick Gonzlez, Pirates
7 - Patrick Bailey, Giants
21 - Kyle Backhus, Diamondbacks (RC)
TP-17 Vladimir Guerrero, Blue Jays, Profiles insert
SMLB-14 - Corbin Carroll, Diamondbacks, Stars of MLB insert
 
The Guerrero Profiles insert pays tribute to the '90s Profiles insert (I'm fuzzy on the year, 1996? I wasn't collecting). It even has a quote on the back from Ken Griffey Jr., just like back then. That's neat. (At least I assume that's a real Griffey quote).
 
Now this: 
  

This is a great shot ... and a night card. I haven't checked to see if fits in my night card binder, but I want to force it in any way I can.
 
These used to be checklist cards but I think those have vanished in 2026. There's just a write-up about the guys on the front.
 
 
PACK FOUR
 

121 - Will Vest, Tigers
330 - Tristan Peters, Rays (RC)
59 - Daniel Schneemann, Guardians
57 - Casey Schmitt, Giants
225 - Max Schuemann, Athletics
145 - Kenedy Corona, Astros (RC)
218 - Andrew Abbott, Reds
153 - J.T. Ginn, Athletics
248 - Ryan McMahon, Yankees
TOG-18 - Bryce Harper, Phillies, Titans of the Game insert
169 - Josh Smith, Rangers, rainbow foil parallel
275 - Luisangel Acuna, Mets, spring training parallel
 
Schneemann, Schmitt and Schuemann. That is a record for the longest run of SCH last names in one pack.
 
Now this:
 

I despise these. There is nothing more low-effort and meaningless in the world of baseball card parallels than stamping the front and calling it a new card. I hate all versions (yes, I'm trying to complete a '75 version but that was born out of my horror that a '75 card was stamped and trying to turn it into a positive). When I get a Dodgers version of these (think Montgomery Club), they never even make my Dodgers binders. They go straight in a box.
 
 
PACK FIVE
 

140 - Cal Raleigh, Mariners
212 - Troy Melton, Tigers (RC)
224 - Cody Freeman, Rangers (RC)
244 - Angel Martinez, Guardians
217 - Chad Patrick, Brewers
29 - Landen Roupp, Giants
32 - Shinnosuke Ogasawara, Nationals (RC)
195 - Mickey Mantle, Yankees, 1991-themed insert
10 - Jacob Misiorowski, Brewers
122 - New-Age Athletics, Athletics
SMLB-18 - Jose Ramirez, Guardians, Stars of MLB insert
 
I finally got some stars in this pack!
 
The A's card is another night card that I'll have to see if there's a spot for it.
 
Now this:
 

Mickey Mantle returned to Topps products last year. It was a fairly reserved roll-out as I wasn't buried in Mantle cards as I was 15-20 years ago. The word mark on this 1991 cards is giving me the eye twitch, why is this two lines? What is the world is wrong with just "Yankees"?

 
PACK SIX
 

51 - Matthew Boyd, Cubs
77 - Spencer Horwitz, Pirates
167 - Wikelman Gonzalez, White Sox (RC)
37 - Jakob Marsee, Marlins (RC)
80 - Trevor Rogers, Orioles
325 - Christopher Sanchez, Phillies
160 - Victor Robles, Mariners
317 - Troy Johnston, Marlins (RC)
177 - Brayan Bello, Red Sox
246 - Oneil Cruz, Pirates
TOG-13 - Pete Crow-Armstrong, Cubs, Titans of the Game insert
315 - Ryan Jeffers, Twins, spring training parallel
 
Two Marlins rookie cards in one pack. Gee whiz. I had to look up Jakob Marsee since he had a rookie cup and I had never heard of him. He played in 55 games. The list of outfield rookie cup candidates must've been thin.
 
Now this:
 

This is the best-looking card out of the box. If every card looked like this I would definitely be trying to complete the whole set.
 
But I won't. There are too many pitchers pitching, hitters hitting, just like there's been for years and years. There are too many rookie cards. Kenedy Corona had two at-bats last year! Maybe give him another year before he hits cards, or here's a thing: find that 4-player rookie card template and use it!
 
And I won't buy another blaster, I'm sure. One Dodger next to four White Sox, three Marlins and three Rays is no way to live. 
 
Now, none of my complaints here mean I didn't enjoy the experience. Much of my commentary is done out of love for the hobby and love for the first cards of the season. Seeing a display of card cornucopia at this time of year is one of my favorite sights. And I continue to look for the first cards of the season because it was what I did as a young boy. It's exciting, even if the cards aren't cardboard and the designs are hit-and-miss.
 
And, yeah, they're too damn expensive. But not expensive enough to not open a few packs every year. I'm more than 50 years into doing this. I still look forward to it and it's still fun. 

Comments

Kin said…
Glad you were able to feel the joy of a full card display. The only baseball I actively search for are the Holiday sets and I was fortunate enough to find a few of them this year.
Don said…
The word mark on the Yankee logo for the 91 insert looks weird. On the Athletics cards, I remember watching a Tiger broadcast last year where the announcer mentioned they could not use the name of the city the A's played in according to mlb rules. I know that sounds crazy.
I'm glad you got that Yamamoto. I loathe that two-line Yankees wordmark thing; some other team has it too and it just looks awful and ultimately just plain weird. I got two-36 card packs and it worked out to about .19 cents per card; so you definitely overpaid for the "blaster" and got the same number of cards over all. These are the first packs I've opened in two years, I believe. It was nice and fun to do and now I'm just trying to trade them all away.
night owl said…
Will it make you feel better if I told you I bought a fat pack and a hanger box today?
John Sharp said…
Hey, a successful rip...you got a Matthew Boyd card...winner, winner! 👍👍
Doc Samson said…
Thank you for sharing, Mr. Owl. Here’s my quickie review on the design: meh. The stitching aspect doesn’t really pop for me. Everything else about it screams Bowman (stop me if you’ve heard this before). Not a set I’m dying to collect. Thanks again.
Hmmm. Not as many horizontals this year?
bbcardz said…
February is my favorite month of the year, because my birthday and Topps Series 1! Isn't it now tradition for Topps to never faithfully recreate a past design?
That Cruz and the Fun Braves card are definitely 90ish photography. Great shots both of them.
Old Cards said…
It hurts to say this, but for modern cards, this design is not too bad. I don't know any of the players except Cal Raleigh and of course, Mickey Mantle. I do appreciate your enthusiasm! .
Was going to hold off until I had the chance to visit our LCS and load a 330 count box for $10, but my wife picked up two fat packs at target. Was thankful for them but definitely not worth buying in stores this year!
Matt said…
This is me when the first new football product comes out and I am not talking about college either.

I used to get more excited for series 1, but no guarantees anymore and a higher cost is a complete turnoff.

Just for traditions sake I may find a fat pack to open just for kicks.
John Bateman said…
Ouch on the cut of the number of cards - Then they make the high number heritage short print cards impossible to get - i need to decide if I want to eat food for a month or get Nick Kurtz rookie card.
Ryan H said…
I think you're looking at the situation in a backwards fashion. Fanatics is doing bloggers a favor by putting less cards in blasters. You don't have to scan as many cards, therefore write less about their product, and you can get to bed sooner. That's three positives in my book!

Fanatics has killed my interest to even blog about old cards. Thanks Mr. Owl for keeping the hobby candle still burning in the window for us all.
Zippy Zappy said…
I walked past a shop that sold sports cards and I looked at all the products on the shelves and the only word that came to mind was "slop".
Fuji said…
I remember the days of only getting the 3rd Monday of the week off for Washington and Lincoln's birthday. That was back when I was in school. Sometime in the 90's, the districts in my area adopted the winter break calendar. Not gonna lie... it's a week I circle on my calendar every year. And it has nothing to do with the release of Topps flagship.
Crh614 said…
the last number of years, Blasters have been my main way of trying to build the set (then trading for the rest). This year I wont be buying any blasters at all. It really seems like the Fat Packs are the best value for set building, the most cards for the best price.

Also, In hand, I think the Ben Williamson might be one of the best looking cards in the set (Yes, along with the O'Neil Cruz)
night owl said…
@Ryan H~
I actually did note there were fewer cards to upload and did appreciate it!

@Crh614~
I don't get the fat pack love. Yes more cards for your buck but they're know for dupe runs and the one I bought yesterday had one.
Stack22 said…
I also ran into some 2026 and picked up a few packs. Had a blaster in hand, but realized I'd get more cards for less money by buying three jumbo packs (Idk what they're called, they're on hangers and are thick, but aren't the hanging boxes), so I went with the packs. Was pleasantly surprised that there were very few inserts in them.
Ginko-5 said…
It's a shame the price to buy new cards these days is getting even more excessive, but of course you got to get at least some of them. Hopefully my LCS will start putting individual 2026 Topps cards into the quarter box soon and I can pick and choose which cards I want rather than being stuck with players I've never heard of on teams I don't care about.
Grant said…
Chuc mung nam moi, N.O!
GCA said…
Bonus points for a decent design and making combo cards instead of checklists.
Aside from that, I only know about 8 or 9 players on those base cards. I'll wait for A&G again.
I think I will do a post on contents vs. price of blasters. I've saved quite a few empty boxes over the years. (Only have flagship baseball up to 2020 though). But the TCDB has packaging images....
AdamE said…
Teel was the player that the White Sox traded Crochet away for so they really do expect him to be a star. Also, it's the White Sox so with the current roster it isn't so easy to pick a "Star Player" for the card.
bryan was here said…
I snagged a $6.99 pack at Target when I stopped by there over the weekend. Surprisingly, the display was still pretty full. I wasn't disappointed with the overall cards, but yeah, those spring training parallels are stupid. Just another cash grab.
And now we wait for the factory sets to drop later this summer...
Nick Vossbrink said…
1. Yamamoto's leg on the 91 is definitely weird. 91 did break out of the frame but never bled off the card edge. Also Topps (correctly) designed things so guys were striding out of the frame so only the lead leg (or arm) would break the frame.

2. I just clocked that the city abbreviations are two letters for SF, SD, and TB which makes it weird to me that they still use LAA/LAD, CHC/CWS, and NYM/NYY for the two-team cities. There's already a team logo. If you want the city name/abbreviation then just use the city name/abbreviation.

3. It's been happening for a while but it's increasingly annoying me that Topps is inconsistent with cap logo vs team logo on their card fronts. Especially since a lot of the cap logos are white on a colored cap and Topps just prints a white logo for those instead of adding color to the card.

4. Totally agreed on the stupid fancy foil stuff. I only like it on the special All Star set and in that case only if it's a card of a player who was actually an All Star that year.

5. Double-stacked wordmarks in the 1991 design are an abomination (Reds are like the Yankees). I suspect this is caused by too many lawyers and Topps feeling that it can't modify any of the existing wordmarks. (the fact that some teams like the Yankees and White Sox don't actually have team-name word marks is also madness at this point)

6. Design is growing on me but it still looks like tighty whiteys.