Skip to main content

Just posting a little nonsense

 

It was kind of busy this weekend. I went down for a card show today and it takes quite a bit of driving -- this is the bigger one, instead of the one right in town.
 
I'll have a full report on that in the next day or two, but I wanted to make a quick observation about some very modern cards for a moment.
 
The above three cards sit consecutively in the 2025 Topps portion of my Dodgers binder. They are all parallels. But they are not the same parallel.
 
Perhaps you can tell from the image. I realized after taking pictures that the differences are a little more obvious in the photos than if you're just looking at them with the naked eye. But let's go through the "differences" shall we?
 

 River Ryan is the "Holo Foil" parallel.
 
 

 Teoscar Hernandez is the "Confetti" parallel.
 
 
 

Shohei Ohtani is the "Sandglitter" parallel.
 
None of these parallels are numbered, which would have helped narrow things down. As you can imagine, it took me awhile -- especially on the last two -- to figure out what they were. I actually walked away from my computer -- twice -- when determining the Hernandez parallel.
 
This is the kind of thing that I used to holler about with Panini's parallels. There seemed to be about a bazillion and much of the time the names given the parallels didn't seem to match up with what was in front of you. But that was Panini -- ha, ha -- they're so incompetent and easy to ignore, Topps would never do that many parallels!
 
Well, uh, now they are. Here is what TCDB has listed for 2025 Topps, and this is just the base set and doesn't include insert parallels (remember how ridiculous those were when they first started about 10 years ago?)
 
Aqua Rainbow Foil
Black Diamante
Black Holo Foil
Black Rainbow Foil
Blue Holo Foil
Blue Rainbow Foil
Canvas
Clear
Confetti
Diamante Foil
First Card (1/1)
Foil Fractor
Gold
Gold Diamante
Gold Holo Foil
Gold Rainbow Foil
Green Holo Foil
Green Rainbow Foil
Holiday
Holiday Birds
Holiday Eggs
Holiday Flowers
Holiday Rabbits
Holiday Tin
Holiday Umbrella
Holiday Watering Can
Holo Foil
Independence Day
Memorial Day Camo
Orange Diamante
Orange Holo Foil
Orange Rainbow Foil
Pink Diamante
Pink Holo Foil
Platinum Holo Foil (1/1)
Purple Holo Foil
Purple Rainbow Foil
Rainbow Foil
Red Diamante
Red Holo Foil
Red Rainbow Foil
Sandglitter
Silver Crackle Foilboard
Team Color Border
Tinsel
Topps Foil Pattern
True Photo (called a "variation" but seems like a parallel to me)
Vintage Stock
Wood
 
By my count that is 49 different parallels for each card. I think Panini Donruss during its peak had maybe half that (not that I paid close attention).
 
As a Topps collector from way back before there was any competition, I'm pretty loyal to the brand, while still collecting other stuff. I've enjoyed poking fun at Panini because Topps has logos and backs you can read and better designs.
 
But now Topps is copying Panini and going even farther into nonsense. I stopped paying attention when 2014 Topps unveiled six or seven parallels. There's no way I'm going to try to collect even 1 percent of all that. 

But, as always, I'll take the Dodgers.

Comments

carlsonjok said…
This makes me irrationally angry and I don't even collect modern.
They are all stupid and ridiculous and cheap and lazy and foolish.
Bo said…
https://www.beckett.com/news/topps-locks-up-mlb-exclusive-card-license-throuugh-2020/ "“Since making Topps our exclusive baseball card licensee, they have continually validated that decision by bringing clarity to the marketplace and reinvigorating the hobby, especially among young people,” said Howard Smith, the MLB Senior Vice President, Licensing, in a prepared statement." Bringing clarity??
Doc Samson said…
I remember when Score only did one or maybe two parallels per set in the 1990’s. It seems like a million years ago now.
Old Cards said…
What a waste of cardboard. They could be producing reprints of vintage cards!
You missed a couple, there's the base plus 57 parallels bringing it to 58.
Fuji said…
Having that many different parallels is silly. I mean I guess it can be fun for some collectors... but it's not my cup of tea. I say keep it to a handful and make them semi-tough to pull. Or if they need to have a bunch of parallels... max it out at 9 different. That way a collector can build a colorful nine-pocket page for their favorite player :D
night owl said…
Johnny's Trading Spot ~

I don't know what that means, but I'll take your word for it that I missed something.
Zippy Zappy said…
This is why I also pulled the plug on being a hardcore player collector, even if that player only receives one Topps flagship card that means having to track down dozens of the same card that comes in slightly different colors that you might not find until years down the line.
Anonymous said…
The best part of collecting retired players on the PSA set registry is that they only count cards from when the player was active. For Steve Garvey or Ron Cey, that means a finite amount of cards to collect. Of course the downside is that you have to collect cards in slabs.
John Bateman said…
49, 57 or 58 - its uncollectable
Anonymous said…
I'm thanking my lucky stars/sparkles/confetti bits the player I PC doesn't appear on the 2025 Topps flagship checklist!
Nick Vossbrink said…
Glad I don't care about these. I'll take them when people, send them to me. I'll never track or purchase them. Even for the player collections.
Zach said…
From being out of the game for awhile and getting back into it, parallel variations and the slight differences make it challenging to grasp. Parallels that aren't numbered with so many options make it feel a bit diluted.