Skip to main content

My very own newspaper cards ... sort of

 

It only took three trips to the World Series in four years but I now have my own family rooting posse for the Dodgers' attempt to win this year's Series.

Both my daughter and wife -- never interested much in baseball -- are fully on-board. As I worked through Game 1, I received texts from both, updating me on Dodgers excitement, and it feels good having my own crew, in this vast Yankee wasteland, celebrating what I am celebrating. It's so rare where I live.

With the added attention, the World Series, as you know, turns the players participating in it into almost immortal beings. They will be remembered forever because they were in the Series. It's the only reason I recall people like Brian Doyle, Tom Lawless and Mickey Morandini today.

Those players' cards will grow in stature. Every year, as I start to put away cards from that year -- we're coming up on that ritual right now -- I marvel at how much more I know some of the players than I did when I pulled those cards (Randy Arozarena's 2020 flagship card is example #1). And I also want more cards from those players, especially the Dodgers.

Back in July, when the season was starting up and we had no idea whether it would conclude, I discovered that the Los Angeles Times was issuing images of the current roster that contained a baseball card design. The paper would post the images on social media and as a certain Dodger player accomplished something during those opening games, the Times would post the baseball card image of the player.

I was entranced and immediately swooned over these "cards".


I have a thing for "newspaper" cards. Actually, as a fan of periodicals, I find any card that is either produced by or replicates a magazine, newspaper or yearbook, desirable. It is the best of both worlds to me: the combination of card and info publication.

Newspaper cards are a little difficult to come by. There aren't a ton of them and many were printed on newsprint -- some long ago -- which is flimsy and not the most pleasing image. But I love them and I'm always excited when a newspaper decides to print "cards" of their local team in the paper (my paper recently did this a couple years ago with the local pro hockey team).

But I assumed that the L.A. Times wasn't printed these images as physical cards in the newspaper. I live a long way from their headquarters anyway, so I have no idea whether they made physical cards available or not.

But I liked these images so much that I started to save some of them in case I wanted to print them out myself.

Nick, of njwv, noticed this and did something super-nice for me. He has a printing background and all kinds of printing knowledge that I don't have. You would think that me working in a building with a printing press for years and years some of that knowledge would seep into my head. But nope.

He put together a PDF of all of the LA Times card images and sent it to me a couple of months ago. It sat in my DMs for a long time before the World Series spurred me on to try to print them out. I just did that earlier today.








 
Nick very efficiently added marks (I don't know the printing terms) and said he tinkered to make trimming easier.

I printed these on thicker printing paper so the cards wouldn't be flimsy. Obviously the printed images aren't as sharp and bright as the online images but that's the beauty of newspaper cards.

Just about all of the key Dodgers players are here, it's a veritable Topps Total set (minus paying $9.99 per card). I guess the most glaring omission is tonight's Game 2 starter/opener/whatever the heck he is Tony Gonsolin. And there are a handful of guys who aren't with the team. Terrance Gore is long gone. Ross Stripling was traded. Caleb Ferguson is injured.
 
I also like the backs a lot, and the 60-game season comparison.
 
The cards printed on traditional 8 1/2-by-11 paper are smaller than your regulation baseball card.

Here is a look:



But I'm super happy to have these. The next problem is turning them into actual cards. I want to trim these mechanically as I don't trust my hand skills. I don't know the best way to do this. Suggestions?

Also, there is the matter of pasting the backs to the fronts in as careful a manner as possible. Lining them up and eliminating bubbling, etc., are the biggest issues that I know of. Suggestions there, custom card makers?

Worst comes to worst, as Nick said, I can just leave them on their 8 1/2-by-11 pages as they are. They do look very nice all together like that.

Nick also sent me a handful of Dodgers needs from the turn of the century, cards he discovered from collecting years ago.



 
He warned me about the paper loss on the one Private Stock card. I don't mind. That one is the base card in that set while the gold Sheffield is a parallel. I didn't know the golds existed until Nick offered the cards. But then I'm not up on turn-of-the-century cards.
 
I do wish there would be more cards that you could get out of periodicals. But, with all of print under siege and needing a license for every damn thing, I don't suppose that's realistic.
 
At least the World Series is still a big deal.
 
I'll be working tonight. But my fellow rooters will be keeping me posted!

Comments

Nick Vossbrink said…
Oh good glad those printed nicely. I should've probably given you more of a border to work with but I was rolling with the LA Times sizing and didn't take a step back.

1. If you want to print those card-sized you'll need to uncheck the "shrink page to fit" option in Acrobat.

2. Best way to align fronts and backs is to use a light table and line up the trim marks on each sheet. There may be one at your work. Failing that you'll probably have rig up some mechanical way of doing it.

3. Best way to glue together is to use a spray mount of some sort. Ideally acid free but Super 77 is probably fine. Those give you some time to align and rub bubbles out before sticking.

4. Trimming. A rotary paper cutter is best hough any paper cutter is probably okay. Those generally have a grid you can use to measure sizes insetad of just eyeballing things.

5. If all this sounds like too much work you can always trim each front and back out separately and just stuff them together in a page pocket (or penny sleeve). I don't expect this to be a set you'll sort and resort much but I laid out the pages so that the blue stripe cards were together and you probably desire a different player order than the one I did.
steelehere said…
Interesting how the LA Times couldn't get an updated photo of Jake McGee on the Dodgers. I know he was a last minute signing but maybe a little photoshop could have put him in a Dodger uniform.

Terrance Gore is actually still on the Dodgers 40 man roster. He was part of the 28 man roster for the Wild Card Series against the Brewers though he didn't play. He since hasn't been added to any other the other playoff series rosters though.
That's a nice set... I wish one of my team's local papers would do something like that. Good luck in getting it in physical form!
Take them to work and make one of the damnyankee fans cut them for you.
Brett Alan said…
Those look great. The idea of using the previous season's first 60 games is brilliant--when was the last time Topps put that much effort into the back of a card?
Fuji said…
Those LA Times cards are cool. Printing them on card stock is smart... but it'd be cool to print them on news print too. Back in the 80's, the SJ Mercury News would print a sheet of baseball cards for the A's and Giants each year. I collected the A's, but over the years they were either tossed or sold off with my original collection. I've seen people frame them and sell them at the flea market, but they're always asking outrageous prices.
Nick Vossbrink said…
For Fuji. I still have my Mercury News cards. I've wondered if I can find them in microfilm someplace. https://sabrbaseballcards.blog/2017/07/07/rolling-my-own/
Fuji said…
nick vossbrink - thanks for sharing those. sure brought back fine memories. i always thought they made a couple of a's pages during their w/s run, but then again it was a long time ago.
AdamE said…
Glad your Dodgers are in the World Series. I pains me to see Mookie in blue and white but man is he fun to watch.

You are correct in stating that original "Newspaper cards" are difficult to come by. In all my years of searching for Virdon cards I have found exactly one time when a Newspaper card of his was offered up for sale but unfortunately it was part of a full set that sold for hundreds of dollars. I even researched what days the paper came out with his cards in them an do a daily search of ebay with the dates hoping that someone offers a full Pittsburgh Post Gazette. I've been checking for those dates in ebay for close to 10 years now without a hit yet.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-0u9IIO42pZo/UPXQiX_8ItI/AAAAAAAADjM/lEgpnuZGkJM/s800/72%2520Post%2520Gazette.jpg

That is what the 1972 card looks like. It was printed on April 6, 1972 on page 22.

One day persistence will pay off and I will find it and the other year Newspaper cards of Virdon.
BaseSetCalling said…
Maybe check the Preferences dialog box for your printer. Or one at work. Many of them can now print 2-sided pages.

I would end up printing these and then also end up stalled at cutting them myself, scared I couldn’t cut straight.

I saw a lot ‘newspaper cards’ when I was young. If only...

Popular posts from this blog

Greatest 100 cards of the '80s: progress report 3 ... and a date

  Big news! I have a date set for the Greatest 100 Cards of the '80s countdown! I didn't want to post a date until I had whittled my list of card candidates down to the final 100. But I just did that today and ... wow, was that tough to do. As is often the case when I do long-form countdowns like this -- the Greatest Cards of the '70s, the Best Dodger Cards Ever Made -- I feel a bit sorry for the cards that just missed the cut. There is nothing wrong with those cards. And on another day, maybe they would make the countdown. But this is the kind of ruthless examination that you've come to expect on this blog and, so, I will deliver.   Here are five cards that did not make the final 100 but if the ranking went to 105 places, they would be there. Also, I'm going to give you a chance to vote one in!   1980 Topps Frank White I have long loved this card and have mentioned it a few times on the blog. It's one of the best All-Star cards made since I started collecting c

The curse and gift of being an introvert

    I finished a week-long binge session of "The Queen's Gambit" Thanksgiving night.   Unlike many of my wife's Netflix interests, things like "The Crown" and various family comedy/dramas, I knew I'd be interested in "Gambit" while she was watching it. I'm a sucker for the "intelligent, pretty girl breaks up the boys club" story, and the fact that it featured chess was intriguing.   I haven't played chess since I was a teenager, but I used to play it regularly, not that I was any good. My uncle was. He would play in various local tournaments and come back with stories about the weird habits and tactics of his chess rivals. The gist of his stories was "this is something you don't want to do." But it sure sounded interesting. As Anya Taylor-Joy says, the mini-series isn't really about chess. The character she plays, Beth Harmon, has a lot of problems, a terrible family back story and substance abuse issues. She

Catch this!

I have long admired this card.   It's an Awesome Night Card from way back and it was one of the only 1986 Topps cards that I owned in 1986. I don't remember at all buying packs of cards in '86 and I had so few that year, but I must have bought some because I've known about that Bo Diaz card for 35 years.   I've known about it for so long that it seemed a given for the upcoming Greatest 100 Cards of the '80s countdown. A tag at the plate was relatively rare on cards in the '80s and to get the entire scene in the frame, and also knowing who is being tagged out , was an achievement. It is an achievement. (Also, they're somehow playing while it's snowing). But after reviewing eligible candidates for the countdown, I began to have my doubts. Oh, that's not taking anything away from the Diaz card. It's still great. But have you noticed how terrific the catcher cards are in 1986 Topps? We'll start from the beginning. At card No. 88 is Tom Niet