Skip to main content

I will resist


The latest incarnation of the Topps Archives set is due to hit shelves this week.

For months I was uncertain of what designs Archives would use in 2019 or even when it would be released. That's because those announcements came in April, a whirlwind month of Very Grown-Up Problems for me and I totally missed the news.

It takes a lot to get information about a new 1975 tribute past me but it did, all the way into mid-August.

But now we're here and I'm caught up, and I have some decisions to make.

The first one is whether I will attempt to complete all of the cards in Archives that are devoted to the '75 design, much as I did with the set three years ago when it chose 1979. Once again, I have zero interest in the other two designs -- 1958 never impressed me much and 1993? Come on.

I'm undecided on whether I will attempt another partial completion.

Mostly it's because I know Archives will never get the tribute to the '75 design exactly right (I still don't know why Topps does so much better with this in Heritage than it does in Archives). And while that's merely annoying with other designs, it's borderline heresy for 1975. Already, the sample above is giving me the irks because not a single card of a player in the 1975 Topps set with the purple-pink design used black letters for the player's name! There were white letters! ARRRRGH!


Like so. Gee whiz.

I also can tell the team name width is off, it doesn't cover the width of the top-end of the frame like the '75 cards did.

All right, the second decision I need to make is regarding the extras that always comes with Archives. In previous versions, Archives issued past subsets and inserts, such as 1969 Deckle Edges and the Turn Back the Clock cards as inserts. This year, apparently, there is a 100-card insert set of, uh ... 1975 minis.

OK. I feel people staring at me.

Supposedly this is something I should collect. I once completed an entire 200-card '75 mini tribute insert set that was in 2011 Lineage (the forerunner to Archives). It sits proudly in its own binder. And I've completed the actual '75 mini set, of course.

So .... I'm not doing it again.

Yup. I'm resisting.

First of all, Topps describes this particular insert as "limited." This is the usual bullshit where a card company takes the most desirable item -- basically the only element in the set truly worth collecting -- and makes it difficult to finish because it knows fans will throw too much money at it.

So that annoys me and it's enough for me to stay away.

The reason I'm able to stay away so easily -- and ignore the collecting voices in my head -- is that I've already been through this ritual. And that was 200 cards. Also, 2024 Heritage, the set that will pay tribute to the 1975 set, is less than five years away and there's no way in the world it won't have mini parallels. Those will look a lot better than these, too, and if they're not short-printed, I'll have to take a shot at those.

Of course, I'm happy that Archives is finally addressing the '75 design. I was getting a little nervous there, especially with Topps repeating the 1980 and 1982 designs in Archives already. With the addition of the '75 and '58 and '93 designs, here are the designs that Archives has yet to select in its base set:

1952
1955
1956
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1974
1978
1987
1988
1994 and above

You can see that Archives has been avoiding the '60s since Heritage has been addressing those designs in the last decade. With Heritage into the '70s now, I expect Archives to snap up the last remaining designs from that decade. Next year we'll possibly see '74 unless Topps finally wants to tackle the '78 design that it seems to find so scary.

But my fears that it found the '75 set too daunting are over so who knows? The appearance of '75 will be enough for me to buy a few packs but there's no way I'll be scouring big-box stores in a mission for limited minis.

Of course, I'll happily take any of the Archives minis that anyone wants to send me.

But I don't expect them to be so super-cool that I won't be able to resist. I WILL RESIST.

Besides ...


... I've got cool stuff like this to look at in my collection.

Comments

Just give mew my Braves, and PC guys, the rest eh....
Mike Matson said…
The main thing I want from Archives this year is the Expos..
Jeremya1um said…
To think that Topps hasn’t used the ‘62 wood grained design for Archives is crazy to me.
Stay strong with your efforts to not purchase Archives. I refuse to buy any until they either bring it back to the ‘01-‘05 days or turn it into a ‘missing cards’ set.
P-town Tom said…
"So that annoys me and it's enough for me to stay away." Good for you. Stand your ground!
If this happened another year, it might've been a more difficult decision for me... but I'm just overwhelmed by my collection as a whole right now, so I won't have any problems with letting this slide and maybe picking up wantlist items down the road.

...And I had the same reaction to the black player name. It's possible that the actual cards will be different than these promos, but it does not inspire confidence.
Fuji said…
Not sure how (with today's technology) Topps can't get the design down to the finest detail. They have five years to get it right for Heritage.
Chris said…
I might have to buy a few packs/blasters of this. I love '58 and '75, and I have fond memories of '93.
gregory said…
It's weird. I'm sure the designers at Topps are capable of recreating the '75 design precisely. So either they intentionally wanted to make it a bit different, or they were lazy. (I'll choose not to answer that one.) Regardless, I think you're making the right choice, especially if Heritage tends to represent the original designs more accurately.
GCA said…
I agree. There must be some legalese buried deep in their contracts that says they can't do the exact same thing more than once. That Ohtani makes me cringe just because of the small details that are off or dead wrong.
I heard of these a few months ago and came to the same conclusion. I’m not chasing the whole set, but I will trade anyone for cards with players who played in 75 if Topps makes those for Archives this year.

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:



1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…

Eighties

I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…