Skip to main content

C.A.: 2019 Topps Stadium Club Christy Mathewson

(Stage 2 of the creation of my card room has begun. A second set of shelves has been purchased and erected for my Dodgers binders. With that, there will be some reorganizing of stuff on the wall and possibly moving the card desk around. Then I'll get the remaining binders off the floor and onto shelves and then it's on to Stage 3 -- wall stuff! But now it's time for Cardboard Appreciation. This is the 284th in a series):


First reaction: he pitched in that?

More on that in a minute. But I wanted to mention that I've noticed a handful of new legends in Topps products this year.

Most of this is merely the return of retired players who already appeared regularly on Topps cards a decade ago. Mathewson and Pee Wee Reese (still need that wonderful Stadium Club card of Reese) were regulars in Topps products in 2010 and 2011. 2019 has also marked the return of cards for Rogers Hornsby and Mel Ott, who were each regulars back in 2011.

The only legends newbies that I can find in my collection are Sammy Sosa, who appears to only have had an Archives card in 2014 since retirement (I'm referring only to Topps here); Tino Martinez, who hasn't shown up post-playing days since 2006; and Casey Stengel, who hasn't been in a Topps product since 2002! So the 2019 Stengel card is well-deserved and I'm glad I have one (from Allen & Ginter).

I think I might make this a regular practice -- charting the legends featured each year -- it would be interesting to see who moves in and who moves out.

Overall it's basically the same old players over and over. I suppose Ruth, Aaron, Clemente, etc., aren't ever going anywhere. And Topps will probably hold on to Derek Jeter forever, too. But Willie Mays hasn't shown up since 2016 and meanwhile, legends (*cough*) Luis Gonzalez and A.J. Burnett are weirdly popping up and I find that fascinating.

So if I don't forget, expect a report here at some point.

Anyway, the Mathewson card is striking. Obviously it's been colorized. Mathewson didn't pitch in a world of color photography. The image appears to be from 1911. A photo of him wearing the same sweater was taken during spring training in March, 1911 in Marlin Springs, Texas.

This explains things for the Stadium Club shot quite a bit. It must have been a cold day in Marlin Springs, which is south of Dallas, near Waco, for Mathewson to wear his collar all the way up. Here is the shot that Topps used for the card.

I'm going to assume Mathewson did not wear that while playing.

Those sweaters were the style back then, the forerunner to the jacket and, now, the hoodie. Here's another shot:


For the first decade of the 1900s, there was probably no other player better than Mathewson except for Honus Wagner and Cy Young. I don't seem to hear as much about Mathewson as I do those other early 1900s players like the ones I mentioned above and Hall of Famers like Ty Cobb and Walter Johnson.

Yeah, this is a Dodger fan saying I think he should get a little more credit, if only for the sweater.

Comments

Brett Alan said…
Mays seems to have a couple online-only Topps cards this year. Is it possible Topps has the rights to use him in online sets but not packs? Really weird, but I can’t imagine that they wouldn’t have put him in the “Greatest Players” insert set if they could have.
Nick Vossbrink said…
So on the topic of baseball sweaters I have to dredge up Meredith Wills's blog since it's all kinds of awesome and even though she's now doing great stuff with the changes MLB is doing to the baseball I really love this deep forensic look at how these century-old garments were constructed. http://hofknitter.blogspot.com
Fuji said…
I'd love to see a post charting the legends appearances. It's one of those things I hadn't really thought of... but now that I have, I'm curious.
EbeSPN said…
Any of the cards of that era interest me, especially when they use a new photo or like they did for the 2009 Topps Updates series with Cy Young with the Boston Rustlers, Honus Wagner with the Louisville Colonels, Mathewson with the Reds, Ty Cobb with the A's and Babe Ruth with the Braves.
Tino did gett some 2019 love from A&G, Archives, Tribute this year, and a Bowman buyback (the stamp makes it a 2019 issue for me). I recently added him to my PC. so now I need all 36 cards from 2019.
GCA said…
You like baseball sweaters? Here's Christy and the whole 1909 team from my framed photo:
https://a84e725c-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/cardwantlists/home/t205-giants/My%201909%20Giants%20sm.jpg?attachauth=ANoY7crLCuEn4ArjRL0zyK5C8RHf4ofy-T26Cs5-oe7evXPgeZvLIfpLpjhK2b-s0Joqu_tqxZwYyUhMEUumomn3nYHU8fwe28S98sef1v2BGkSepN65BOY0rcqBwmFTiOPRKkAGBw_rXNzJba8d7X7y2NEYQ3JHu62wopzIpsk0vnFp97PPr2ZKivnza1zg3IC0XgZL32n2mHURuxly2V2Hd_wyM2iFXt9XZIg4ETC3OVZQCN65XtXcWJ820cJQhOBhd1lma-9r&attredirects=0

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:



1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…

Eighties

I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…