Skip to main content

While you were summering

Topps publicly unveiled the design for 2020 flagship yesterday, while I was in the middle of a four-hour car trip.

Needless to say, it was a surprise. I didn't expect Topps to do anything like that this early. The last five years or more, Topps has revealed the next flagship design in the middle of August. This still seems terribly early to someone who as a kid opening packs didn't know what the design looked like until he opened his first pack, but at least it fell around the same time and I could prepare in my usually inefficient manner.

But July?

Topps knows nobody pays attention to anything in July, right? July was created so you didn't have to notice anything. Except lakes, you can notice lakes in July. And trees. And frogs. And you can notice baseball but nothing that has to do with marketing or release dates or added value. Just fun baseball stuff that takes very limited brain power.

But, no, Topps is determined to wake you up in the middle of July because it needs to be NOTICED. Every business is fighting for its life out there and they're going to annoy who they need to annoy to stay relevant. LOOK AT ME! I AM RELEASING A PICTURE OF SOMETHING YOU CAN'T EVEN BUY FOR SEVEN MONTHS! Please don't forget me!

And, so dutifully -- one day late, mind you -- I am noticing.

Here is what I notice:

I'm not going to buy much of that.

Some of this is because Topps refuses to return to its roots and put damn borders around its card edges. None of this is because the writing is sideways. Sideways writing is a well-worn tradition in baseball cards. Look at 2005 Topps. Look at 1999 Topps. Hell, look at half the sets released in 1999. Look at half the sets released in the late 1990s! Sideways writing everywhere.

Everyone lived. They titled their heads up to watch Big Mac or Sammy slam a home run, then tilted their heads to the side to read their baseball cards. It's not a big thing.

My general issue is the numbing similarity of the design to other recent designs. You graphics people may have noticed that Topps is committed, fully and completely, to the slash. The slashiness of its graphics first appeared around 2014 and was rather noticeable in some of its 2015 inserts. Then in 2016, nobody could avoid the slash.

Clink! It arrived like knife sliding against chrome until it locked into place. On every card. Angular slashiness.

The angular graphic lines continued in 2017, both in flagship and in just about every insert.

Diagonal lines, boys, that's what it's all about. Triangles. Parallelograms. Lines that make a sound, cutting across your vision.

In 2018, more of the same. The player name and team name trail off to the right until it falls to pieces, leaving a diagonal slash at the end of the bar.

I think this is why 2019 flagship appealed to me immediately. There is no obvious slashing in the design. However that doesn't mean the slashes have stopped. They are all over the Topps Now cards this year.

 So the slash marks have never been that far away the last five years or so.

And with 2020, pointy edges and northwest-to-southeast patterns are back in a major way. Just about every graphic element is at an angle (pay no attention to the graphic squib in the bottom right corner, that's me cropping out the card overlap in Topps' image).

As usual, I try to find a past design that resembles the newest design and Bowman jumped immediately to mind. It looks a lot like modern Bowman, which does not appeal to me at all. But which Bowman set?

Turns out it is a very slashy set from the start of the slashy craze:

Similarities, yes? Slash marks and angular boxes. Sideways writing. Team logo in the bottom corner. 2020 Topps flagship looks like 2016 Bowman.

That's kinda gross.

There is some hope, I guess. The vertical cards (because we're going to do this half horizontal/half vertical thing forever) seem to provide more breathing room and could produce some nice photos -- provided that the pictures are sharper than they are in 2019 flagship.

The vertical nature of the 2020 design gives me some bad flashbacks to 2007 Upper Deck:

When the cards left you claustrophobic.

The 2020 design is really a continuation of the designs from the last four years. It doesn't break any new ground and while it's not off-putting at all, it does make me feel sad for the design when folks do their "designs of the 2020s" retrospective. 2020 is going to look terribly dated. And I still won't be trying to complete a post-2015 flagship set.

So, those are my initial 2020 design ramblings. I thought I would be doing this in August. But Topps wanted to be needed.

I hope they don't keep pushing up the date when they release the next year's design. At this rate, it will be showing off the following year's design before the current year's set appears on shelves.


Chris said…
My instant reaction to this is that it's my favorite design of the decade.

But seriously, it's not too bad. I think I'll like it better than '19 and '17 for sure, possibly even '16.
Jeremya1um said…
You totally hit it on the head. Slashed everywhere, and it totally resembles 2016 Bowman.
I see a little bit of 2003 Flair Greats in it with the part of the card with the logo.
Someone should hold a contest where everyone can design a layout that is better than 2020 Topps, people vote on it, and it is produced as a better option than Flagship or Panini. This is beginning to get obnoxious.
And you are right about the release of the photos being early. When I went back and looked at old blog posts, the ‘19 photos were released around August 16, ‘18 was around August 7. Middle of August is fine, but July seems a bit early, especially with Series 2 barely being on the shelves.
Nachos Grande said…
I've more or less given up on flagship for a number of years now. I agree that borders need to make a return. I think Topps is playing the design much "safer" these days, little incremental changes rather than a full design overhaul. Because of that, it makes differentiating one year's worth of designs from another year's much more difficult. Everyone knows the difference between a 1990 Topps and a 1991 Topps (and a 1991 from a 1992, etc.). However, somewhere along the way Topps gave up the massive changes - probably a focus group decision or something.
John Bateman said…
There is something very similar between Mike Trouts 2020 Topps and 2019 Donruss card. I think Topps blended 2019 Donruss and 2016 Bowman and they had a kid 2020 Topps.
but Heritage will be cool
I agree with the consensus here -- I don't like the design either.

At least we don't have to wait to know that the 2020 Heritage set will look great.
I like it. Works for me.
I'm just happy buying 1966 cards to complete my set. (And it"s not because of the slash!)
ToppsBawlyn87 said…
Incomplete statistics is what put got me selling off all my modern collection, but year old photos and designs in 2020 is another reason for me to stay away. As a factory set buyer, I'd be getting these year old cards in July 2020. They might as well release them now and call it 2019. Bon Voyage, I'm sticking with vintage.
Billy Kingsley said…
Take a look at 2010-11 Pinnacle NHL. That's where the design seems to come from.
steelehere said…
The 2020 Topps set immediately reminded me of the 1996 Leaf Preferred set when I saw it.
JediJeff said…
Late to the game (post): that Yelich card is HORRIBLY weighted. They are centering the image on his eyes, then slapping the design on the card, which is making the entire card "lean" to the left. It would have taken just a few seconds to move the center point of the image so the card is weighted properly, by why expect Topps to do anything smart.

Yes, I am arguing esthetics. But if you are basically creating art, create good art.
Defenders50 said…
I'm choosing to be the optimist here. Next year's Heritage has a very good chance to appeal to myself, someone born in the late 80s, and so I'm looking at this as a chance to save up more funds for chasing that instead of this.

I wonder if Topps really wanted something modernistic/futuristic for 2020. That's the only thing that makes sense to me after people likes the curves and swoops of 2018 and 2019's flagship sets.
Fuji said…
Dang it. I read this post about two weeks too late. I was teaching my students how to classify triangles and quadrilaterals. Never thought to bust out the piles of overproduced Topps inserts I've accumulated over the years and use them as examples.
AdamE said…
As soon as I saw the design I thought of my file cabinet because the side looks jut like a stack of 3 tab folders.
GCA said…
Can't say I hate it, but it is really close to the Bowman design. It's OK enough to be the last flagship set I do, especially if the inserts are as bland and unimaginative as the past several years.

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:

1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…


I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…