When I wrapped up my last set blog more than two years ago, I figured that would be the end for me and set blogs.
I had completed three of them at that point: 1975, 1971 and 1985. All Topps blogs. The second two, 1971 and 1985, I basically wrote at the same time and it was a bit grueling doing those and Night Owl Cards. I was worn out by May of 2019.
Also, at that point, it seemed like set blogs were long past their freshness date. Chronicling a set was the cool blog thing to do back in 2008. But as the cool kids moved on to other things, only the hard-core set-appreciators were left and there aren't many of them anymore.
Still ...
I left open the possibility of writing another one when I finished off the last two. And just a couple days ago a complimentary comment left at the end of my 1985 Topps made me wonder. "Your blogs are great," it said. "I'd love to see a '73 or '74 version."
Now, I'm not going to do something every time someone says something nice, but the thought has always been there. Specifically, I've always thought it would be cool to write a 1993 Upper Deck set blog. It's one of the few notable card sets from the 1960s to early 1990s that hasn't received the set-blog treatment, that I know of.
As for the comment suggestion, both the '73 and '74 Topps sets were part of set-blog tributes already. I wouldn't do a '74 blog because of that, even though I think that set is highly underrated.
There have been two '73 Topps set blogs but I don't think either of them were finished (I could be wrong). It seems like that set needs proper treatment, given how interesting it is.
But the '73 set is a little too close to '71 and '75, and I wrote about a lot of the players who are in the '73 set already.
So that's where I am.
I still haven't decided whether I'm going to do one again. And it certainly wouldn't be before 2022.
But if I did, which would you like to see?
1993 Upper Deck?
Or 1973 Topps?
(I know, I know, it's up to me).
Leave your preference in the comments. I'd create a poll if making polls was as easy as it was on Blogger five years ago or so. If I figure it out, I'll get one on here.
And if you vote, you have to promise me you'll read it sometimes.
Comments
, but I'll read either one.
1973 over 1993
But, hey, you could write about 1995 Fleer or some crappy recent Donruss set and I'd read it!
If for no other reason to get your take on the Luis Alvarado card.
I have always posted to my blogs for ME. If others like them, or find useful information in them, so much the better.
A blog like Night Owl Cards and a set blog are two different animals, at least for me. I can write on NOC with two readers and it wouldn't matter, but a set blog takes research every post. I'm not doing all that work if no one will read it.
With that being said, I'd gratefully follow and read a set blog created by you for either set, but if I had to pick, I'd go with 1973. (Selfishly, I'd love if you did both.)