How old do you have to be to experience nostalgia?
My daughter and her friends get nostalgic, but it's that weird kind of nostalgic that only college-age kids experience, that nostalgia that isn't really nostalgia because it wasn't even 10 years ago.
You know that song "We Are Young" by Fun? If that pops on the radio -- well, it means I have no control over the radio station, for one -- it will throw my daughter and her friend into fits of "remember when" as if this 2011 song came out when The Brady Bunch was in prime time.
It's bizarre, and as a parent you can't help but announce in response "that was yesterday!" But as the years go on and my daughter and her friends have moved on, I can't help but get nostalgic over stuff that was brand-new not even a decade ago, too.
For instance, 2009.
You remember 2009, right? The movie "Up"? That horrible "Boom Boom Pow" song? But some things were kind of good in 2009.
For example, this was the last year that real competition existed in the baseball card world. Upper Deck was actually producing baseball cards with logos and everything, and nobody but nobody was reduced to surrendering hard-earned cash on Panini's re-imagined world of baseball players as hazardous-waste engineers.
The year 2009 was the first full year of this blog and I was involved in the modern card world full-force. I knew every product, I bought every product, I tried to complete many of them and became as familiar with the cards of the day as I had been since the early 1980s.
Today, I can't keep up with what's being released. And when I feel that panic that team collectors know all too well -- another set? I've got to get those too! -- I sit back and remember:
There are still cards from 2009 that I need.
I received a handful of cards from Matt of Sports Card Collectors that were from 2009, including the Goudey 4-in-1 card you saw at the top. Here are two others:
These Stadium Scenes cards from '09 Piece of History were pretty snazzy back then and I never saw one. It's weird -- and a little Upper Deckish -- that the silver Stadium Scenes card is numbered lower (/149) than the turquoise card (/999) since the silver color is the same as the base-set cards.
These cards make me want to update all my Dodgers needs on the want list right now (if I'm lucky I can get it done by the end of the week). Instead of scrambling over all the cards from the newest Topps Set of the Week, why don't I focus on all these needs from nine years ago?
But, anyway, SCC wasn't done with the numbered cards.
We've traveled out of 2009 now so we're in the land of unlicensed, no-logo cards.
Both of these cards feature their serial numbers on the front. What's your opinion, are serial numbers meant for the front or the back? I prefer the back. It often mucks up the front and putting the number on the back gives people an excuse to read their card backs.
Also, that Bowman Platinum squiggle makes Seager's butt look big. Not that I'm looking.
Last card from the PWE. It's another Panini offering, from the more tolerable Diamond Kings. This is an artist's proof parallel of some sort. I've never understood these artist's proof holdovers from the '90s.
But that's likely because I hold little nostalgia for the 1990s in most cases.
None of the years in that decade can match up to 1975. Or 1983. Or 1987.
Or even 2009.
Comments
Also play Party Rock Anthem around your daughter and see what happens.
I looked at that blue parallel and thought "666/991? That's really strange numbering!" Then I looked at the next one and realized I'd been looking upside down.
I prefer numbering on the front--and preferably oriented the same way as the card-- especially for cards with a low print run (Topps gold parallels numbered to 2018? The back will be fine.)
As far as the serial numbering, I am used to seeing it on the back, but now that you mention it, I think it’s cool to see it on the front. That way, you know you pulled something decent, and I think everything that is numbered less than 100 should perhaps have it on the front (in a spot where it is easily visible).
For the numbering, it depends. If the parallel is obvious, the back is better. If it's more minute, I'd rather it be in front so I can catch it.
Glad you enjoyed the small trip back in time to 2009.
I'm weirdly attached to Topps 1987 because when I was a kid we visited America and I bought baseball cards. I knew nothing about baseball and here was this strange, exotic world and you got so many in a pack! And gum too! Even now those cards trigger something irrational in me.
I'm okay with 1990s nostalgia. Part of me wishes we could go back to when our biggest "problem" was worrying about whether all the computers would crash at midnight on Jan. 1, 2000. lol