Skip to main content

The best Dodger cards ever made countdown: 20-11

For the first time, I can see which cards are up for contention as THE best Dodger card ever made. The list is down to 20 cards and after selecting cards 20 through 11, I now know what is left.

You may have thought that I had already picked out the best card. Nope. Time is too valuable to carve out an hour or two to rank all 100 cards at once. Instead, I ranked them section by section, ignoring the best of the best until their turn came up.

But now that I see what's left, I've got some big deciding to do.

Yet, on the plus side, all of these cards are so good that I have featured them all on the blog at one time or another and therefore ... NO SCANNING.


Time-savers are my favorite thing in life.

So, focus your attention on these 10, tremendous, already scanned Dodger cards:

20. Frank Robinson, 1972 Topps, traded subset

I'll start with a couple of all-time greats who spent just a brief period of time with the Dodgers in the early 1970s. Frank Robinson played for the team in 1972, and this is his only Topps card in which he's featured as a Dodger (outside of the whited-out '73 card). Seeing Robinson as a Dodger is fantastic fun, and the TRADED stamp is both comical and semi-alarming, adding to the impact of this card. One of my all-time favorite card show pick-ups.

19. Rich Allen, 1971 Topps

The 1971 Topps high numbers set is filled with gems like this. You never know what you're going to find in the high numbers. Hatless dudes. Cartoon caps. Players with teams that you never knew they were on. Dick Allen falls into the latter category. Outside of Allen's Topps Super card from the same year (which I need to get some day), this the only evidence of Allen as a Dodger on a Topps card. And you have to love the Dodger Stadium backdrop.

18. Gil Hodges, 1954 Topps

Gil Hodges was at his absolute prime in 1954, the peak of a seven-year run in which he drove in at least 100 runs each season. I'm not a huge fan of the 1954 set, but this is my favorite Hodges card. The man is baseball, and he deserves to be ranked this high.

17. Mike Piazza, 1992 Bowman

It's saying a lot when a common-variety base card from the early 1990s is difficult to obtain. I had a devil of a time acquiring Mike Piazza's Bowman rookie card. It's one of the all-time great rookie cards, and you see it displayed with pride a lot more often than Piazza's Fleer Update rookie of the same year, which is also difficult to obtain and a card I still need. But the Bowman card is far better than the Fleer version.

16. Kirk Gibson, 1989 Upper Deck, World Series subset

Topps flat-out ignored the Dodgers' World Series title in 1981 and did the same in 1988. It ignored the Dodgers' NLCS appearances in 1983 and 1985, too. This is all stuff it would have recognized in the '70s. So, along came Upper Deck in 1989 and recognized one of the greatest home runs ever hit in its debut set. That should have won me over to Upper Deck automatically. Unfortunately, I had been brainwashed by Topps long ago.

15. Pee Wee Reese, 1957 Topps

The "highest-debuting" card in the countdown. I received this Pee Wee Reese card more than halfway into the countdown. That means I had to knock a card off of the countdown to fit in this item. Which card did I eliminate? You'll never know.

14. Duke Snider, 1957 Topps

Back-to-back '57 cards of players on the last Brooklyn team to make the World Series. This is one of the first '57 Dodger cards I ever obtained, snared when my father's co-worker left us a bunch of cards from the '50s. This card was sweet redemption for what happened to my '51 Topps red-back Snider.

13. Johnny Podres, 1956 Topps

I did the same thing with this card that I did with the Sandy Amoros card -- waffled between the '55 and '56 version to determine which one was better. This time I went with the 1956 card. Even though the '55 card is great because you would have owned that card when Podres was pitching his Game 7 shutout against the Yankees to finally win the Bums the pennant -- and the reason why I picked the Amoros card -- I just think the '56 Podres card is vastly better.

Here's the '55 card, so can all critique yourself.

Some of you are going to like the '55 one better, probably because of the Dodger logo. But it's my countdown, chaps and chapettes. The '56 card rules.

12. Ron Cey, 1975 Topps

This is my favorite card of all-time. My favorite card from my first year of collecting, the most frequently shown card on the blog, just my favorite. It's got everything going for it. The colorful '75 design. The terrific all-star star. Cey's mustache, long hair and batting helmet. The gleaming, empty Dodger Stadium stands in the background. It's the card I'd pull out if someone said, "show me why you collect cards."

So why is this card only 12 on the list?

That's how tough this list is to crack. We ain't talking about the Diamondbacks here.

11. Sandy Koufax, 1961 Topps

I didn't want to let autographs and pieces of clothing get in the way of why a card was ranked on this list. I wanted it to be about just the card. But some managed to work their way onto the list anyway. And this is the first autographed card I ever purchased. It's a great one. There's no way to tell if the signature is truly real, unless I sent it to one of those authentication places. But it sure looks like Sandy's signature. And the card keeps me from moaning every time Topps announces a new Koufax autograph card that peons like me will never find. So, you've got to love it.

That's another card I'm sure some can't believe isn't in the Top 10, but I couldn't let the signature completely sway where I ranked it.

And that means all that's left are 10 more cards.

I still have no idea what will be No. 1.


Nick said…
The '71 Allen might be my personal favorite Dodger card out of the ones I own, glad to see it ranked high on your list as well. I absolutely LOVE that one.

Also, I think you made the right choice on the Podres. Although the '55 one is nice, the '56 is far better.

Can't wait to see the Top 10!
jacobmrley said…
Wow! That the '75 Cey is only #12 makes me look forward all the more to the Top Ten.

BTW, that '54 Hodges is also my favorite, though I waffle between the '55 Topps as well.
Roy-Z said…
These are getting good.

I am expecting 10-1 being all manupatches and plain gray jersey/tablecloth swatches.
Dodgerbobble said…
Th 1971 Dick Allen is a beaut. I don't think he ever looked right in the uni, but the card is still amazing. I think the Dodger Stadium pavilion behind him helps. It's funny how little DS has changed since the card was produced 40+ years ago.

Can't wait for the top 10!
Classon Ave said…
What number is that '89 Gibson?
Spiegel83 said…
I was going to say something similar to Dodgerbobble about Dodger Stadium. I can see the exact seats in the Pavilion that I have been sitting in for years.

Can't wait for the Top 10!
Heckuva group. I can't wait to see the rest. Well, I can...
deal said…
I never realized that Frank Robinson had a stint as a Dodger till yesterday - My first thought was - wonder if he had a Dodger Card?

Kudos to NightOwl for reading my mind!
AdamE said…
20. Two things: First I never knew Frank played for the Dodgers. This is one of the great things about blogs and baseball cards in general. Secondly, I like the big TRADED stamp. Forget Updates and Highlights give me Traded and use a big rubber stamp on the cards not that little note in the corner like they did in the eighties.

19. When I think high number cards I think obscure players. If I’m looking through some vintage cards and come across a player I have never heard of I check the back to see how big the number is because in my brain the oddball guys should be in the back of the set.

18. When I think Baseball Player and Dodger the guy I think of is Preacher Roe. I’m seeing all these 50s Dodger cards on the countdown and I can’t help but wonder where’s Preacher? (FYI… the second thing I think of when I think Dodgers is Night Owl so you are in elite company)

17. 1992 Bowman or Fleer Update were not exactly shortprinted, so somewhere someone is sitting on thousands of those Piazza cards.

16. I know it is a great moment in Dodger history but I am surprised it made it this high on your list because it doesn’t show his face and I have read many times you have a problem with that. Personally think it is a great photo. The only thing that would have made this a better card is if they cropped it a hair tighter and let his hand extend onto the white border.

15. Know what the first thing I notice about this card is? (other than the oddball pose…) The stirrups he is wearing. It is just something you hardly ever see anymore.

14. Your countdown is making me appreciate the 1957 set more and more. It has even passed 1956 as my second favorite 50s Topps set. My list now goes 53, 57, 56, 55, 51, 52, 54, 58, 59.

13. You picked the right one. 1956 > 1955 every time.

12. Is the regular version really better than the mini version on your countdown? So much for MMMMMIIIIIIINNNNNNIIIIIIEEEEESSSSS!!!!!!!

11. I like the auto being included in the top of the countdown. I would have been fine with it in the Top 10, you know, since my opinion matters so much to you…
Commishbob said…
When Frank was a Dodger he (and the whole Dodger team) sat behind me in the Astrodome for a University of Houston-Arizona State football game. It's a long story.

And the pair of back-to-back '57s are wonderful cards that I'd consider art.

Despite that I can't get past the fact you have an autographed '61 Koufax. Instant f'ing win.
EggRocket said…
Is that the photographer's knee in the rich allen card?! If so that is my new favorite card.
Anonymous said…
I agree with you on the 56 for the Podres card. The background works really well on this card!

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:

1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…


I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…