Skip to main content

Fear and loathing in my LCS

I think I've struck upon the reason why I have issues with my local card shop. It's not necessarily the prices, although that plays a part as you'll see in a moment. It's not necessarily the workers' complete disinterest in cards, although they're very interested in taking your money. It's not the NASCAR jackets or the NFL bar room signs.

It's this: I have a problem with businesses that are set up like a general store in the 1880s.

Maybe this only makes sense to me, but when I made the connection it was like I had unearthed a great discovery. I then immediately knew why I had a pit in my stomach when I walked into the store and a sense of either relief or disgust when I left the store. I do not like shopping when I have to stare behind the counter at the merchandise or pepper the guy behind the counter with questions.

I do not converse and shop at the same time. Or, let's say I do not do it WELL. I don't like talking and shopping -- at least not with the person trying to sell me something. I get confused. I grew up in the department store era. You walk into the store, and all the merchandise is sitting out there for you to look at, touch, try on, bounce, kick, squeeze, whatever the heck you want to do. And you can do it for as long as you like. And there's no one staring at you while you do it.

There's no one trying to steer you into buying something else. I don't feel like I'm begging to look at something. I don't have to ask the price for everything because the price is right there for me to see, touch and eat, if I'm feeling particularly insane.

Yet, in the majority of card shops that I have been in (and that's not very many actually) just about everything is off-limits, up on a shelf, behind a counter, as if I'm purchasing cigars or girly magazines.

I'm assuming some card shops aren't like that. I know Dave and Adam's Card World in Buffalo is not like that. They have a few things behind the counter. But a whole bunch of their merchandise is on display, with prices, that you can review.

I don't have to get into a conversation with the shop owner about my likes and dislikes or why he's selling a box of Allen & Ginter for the cost of a week's worth of groceries.

I know some collectors like a set-up where you converse with the shop owner. I can see that. It's helpful at times. Especially if the shop owner likes cards. But I'm not someone who likes to make small talk. And I don't like feeling like I'm Mrs. Ingalls asking Mr. Olsen how much eggs are today and whether those cocaine toothache drops will make little Carrie's mouth feel better because we have a long journey by horse and buggy across the prairie!

Put the damn merchandise out on the floor so I don't have to ask so many questions! I'm not buying a car! They're BASEBALL CARDS. Lordy.

Plenty of department stores have no problem putting items above 100 dollars out on the floor. Now, I'm totally aware that comparing a tiny card shop with a department store is not fair and that loss prevention is a much more serious topic for a small shop than a large store. But this set-up is honestly keeping me from going in the store. I mean not everything in the store is that much money anyway. There are 4-dollar packs everywhere.

That's why I enjoy the little discount bowl of cards that sits on the floor in front of the counter. I can grab the packs that I want, no need for questions (although they don't have prices on them either).

So, the bowl is where I started when I stopped by this weekend. I grabbed four more packs of 2002 Topps Gallery because it's about the only thing in the bowl that I like. I didn't get anything great. Just a Dodger that I needed:

OK, so then I braced myself for searching out some new stuff. I asked if they had 2010 Finest. Nope.

2010 Bowman? I knew the answer was going to be nope for that. And it was.

2010 Chicle? Nope. I'm pretty sure the guy didn't know what that was.

2010 Pro Debut? Hey, I was willing to try a pack. But they didn't have any.

He was the weekend guy, so I gave him a little slack. He said all they had was base Topps and Upper Deck and they just got some Allen & Ginter in. I was momentarily stunned. The most recent product on the market was in the store? How unlike them.

I squinted to try to see the price sticker off in the distance on the two A&G boxes. Was that $159.99?

"Yup," the guy said. "One hundred and sixty. Because Strasburg is in it."

Oh, yeah, that Strasburg guy. I wonder if he knows he's being blamed for price-gouging.

I immediately told him that I got a box for 84 dollars right before Strasburg's first start in the majors. What I should have said was that at this very moment you can order a box of A&G for under 100 bucks.

But it wouldn't have mattered. The guy responded with, "Oh yeah?" and I couldn't tell if he didn't believe me or didn't care. He was just the weekend guy. Totally disconnected.

He wasn't going to break up a box, but I was determined to buy something new of hobby quality and hopefully nab a hit or two. So I decided to grab a few hobby packs of Topps Series 2, threw down too much money, and went to ripping.

I didn't get a single relic or autograph.

I didn't really care about that if I could have come very close to finishing off the Series 2 set. But out of the four 50-card packs that I bought, I pulled dupe after dupe. I don't even know how many I pulled because they're all stuffed in the doubles box. But I do know I still need 59 cards to complete the set. The new want list is up.

That was what annoyed me the most. I paid a lot of money -- from my perspective -- in an attempt to come close to finishing off the final third of the set. And I'm way off.

Also, while I'm in a crank-rant, here's another thing about the set that's begun to bother me. I didn't even notice it until Peterson of Sign Here ... and Here brought it up.

He mentioned that Topps appears to have done something to lighten the faces of the players to bring out their expression. Caps or helmets naturally darken faces, and low-riding caps popular with today's player, darken faces even more. (By the way, Topps refrained from doing this with the Joba Chamberlain card -- apparently to continue the legend of Joba, which we all know now is a fantasy).

He said that it made the faces look grainy. Disney-esque, he said. I went back and looked at my cards. I thought he had something there. But I wasn't sure about the reference to cartoon characters. Until I pulled the Omir Santos card out of my pack.

I stared at the card and thought: "That doesn't even look like a real face. It looks like a cartoon face! It looks like they put another face on a player's body. ... Wait -- Peterson was right!"

This little bit of insight has tarnished 2010 Topps for me. I don't like this development at all. I'll press on with completing the set. But between the collation and the constant toying with photos, I'm starting to wonder whether collecting 2011 Topps base is a good idea.

Anyway, here are the highlights of those hobby packs:

Three of those Vintage Legends things. All they're doing is keeping me from completing the base set.

This is pure evil. I pull three 2020 players who are on teams that are direct rivals of the Dodgers? I also pulled Buster Posey from a cereal box a couple weeks ago. So I have three freakin' Giants. I can't even trade those things because, understandably, no one likes them.

This is the highlight of the packs. It's one of the short-print cards and a very nice photo. But I'm pretty certain this card is headed for beardy in an attempt to land whatever Dodger hit he's pulling today.

If my speedy research is correct, this was a play at third base during the seventh inning of Game 1 of the 1971 American League Championship Series. The game, a 5-3 win by the Orioles, was played at Baltimore and featured a four-run seventh inning. In that inning, Robinson walked to lead off the inning, went to second on a single by Brooks Robinson, then went to third on a fly ball to right field by Andy Etchebarren, which would be this play here.

Actually, the highlight of the packs for me was the Andre Ethier Peak Performance card at the top of the post. It looks very All-Star-ish, which is appropriate on All-Star eve, as he will be the N.L.'s starting right fielder.

So, on this day in which I've pretty much sworn off my card shop and soured on 2010 Topps, I'll remain positive from this point forward and focus on a National League victory Tuesday.

See? I can be cynical, cranky and hopelessly hopeful all at the same time. The many moods of night owl.


That Robinson is great! I'm with you on the average card shop being like somewhere you're "not supposed to be." Very, very true.
This post brought a smile to my face. Thanks.
Ryan H said…
3 things..

1. Don't get me started on my Local "Card shop"...
2. I think everyone that has bought any series 2 Topps this year is required to get that 1990 Honus Wagner throwback legend card thingy whatcha-ma-callit
3. I'd be willing to trade for the Robinson as long as beardy isn't interested in it.
dayf said…
I don't mind if stuff is in or behind cases as long as everything is:
1) organized
2) priced
The two I go to down here both have the high dollar cards in cases and boxes behind the cases, but there's also lots and lots of loose cards in boxes for the cheapo stuff so you can root around. Prices on everything too. I'd rather see something with a high price then no price at all.
longlivethewho said…
When my LCS was open, both the owner and the college kid running it would leave me be. They had boxes upon boxes out to search through and only their big hits would be kept behind glass. Sigh... I miss that place.
I have the same issue with my LCS as far as price. You can SEE the prices, but they are unrealistic. All new product is $30-$50 a box more than most online places. I'll pay a little premium to have the packs in hand and support a local business, but I'm not made of money. He also has quite a few boxes from around 2001-2008 and they all still have original, new product prices on them (unless there was something especially good in which case he's raised the prices). I typically go there only for supplies and a pack or two at a time.
Cardboard Icons said…
Actually ... I like those Giants 2020 things ... but I owe you enough already.

BTW, I totally know what you mean about the cardshop experience. I hate going in there feeling like I am being interviewed as to why I like certain products. BUT I understand why things are the way they are ... pack searchers. You put out a fresh box of Topps 2010 and you'll attract some guys who will bend or compare the thickness of packs. Hell, I bet thats why you didn't get jack from your jumbo packs. You should have gotten SOMETHING out of four ...
night owl said…
CI: The jumbos are behind the counter, too. EVERYTHING is behind the counter.
Eggrocket said…
I think the LCSs brought on their own demise. I travel a bit for work and I used to always hit the only surviving shop in the mid-sized town I was visiting. 80% of the time it was the same thing ... bitter guy behind the counter talking about how great 1991 was ... overpriced new stuff behind the counter ... overpriced old stuff under glass ... and if there was ever another customer it was a fat, greasy faced mom-live-wither looking at the magic cards.
Matt Runyon said…
That's a nice photo of Robinson. A nice insert set would be a World Series set with pictures like this. Perhaps they could have one card per WS game and do a decade per year (70s one year, 80s the next year, etc).

Nothing wrong with getting Giants in your packs. :)
Goose Joak said…
I actually really dig the Honus Wagner card.

Popular posts from this blog

A friend indeed

This week has been the kind of week that only late January could produce.

Nothing particularly wrong or terrible happened. Mostly what I felt this week was a sense of spinning my wheels, of working hard without result (or with other people screwing it up), of trying to get things accomplished (while battling a sinus infection) only to have a car noise or a phone call knock me back to square one.

That feeling transferred over to the blog where I probably spent too much time uploading too many photos and conducting too much research and expecting too much in return.

But all of this is a phase. It's the January malaise. I'll snap out of it. It could be worse. I could be dealing with three feet of snow right now instead of the melting three inches that is out there.

And I could be struggling through this week without an envelope in the mail from "A Friend".

That's right, "A Friend".

That's how the return address appeared on the envelope. Just above th…

Degrees of doneness

I just wrapped up my first notable card purchase of 2020.

It was an online order -- from three of every collector's favorite card-buying sites -- and with the exception of three inserts from 2019 and a stray card from 1989, every single card I ordered was made prior to 1980.

That feels good. That feels tremendously good.

I'm starting off 2020 in the right frame of mind.

It's also a good way to put a cork in the 2019 collecting season. There are various ways you can say you're done with the cards from the previous year, call it degrees of doneness, if you will (I order steaks "medium" or "medium well," I don't need anything crawling off my plate).

1. You can be done with collecting sets from 2019. I'm certainly done with that. I didn't try to collect many sets from that year anyway. The 2019 Topps Holiday set and a third of the 2019 Topps Archives set are finished and that's everything I plan to do.

2. You can be done with buying pac…

The lone Ranger

Who is Nick Solak?

Glad you asked.

And thanks to cynicalbuddha for scanning his card into Trading Card Database.

Nick Solak is a former Yankees, former Rays prospect who appeared in 33 games for the Texas Rangers last year.

That, apparently, qualifies him for being the only Texas Ranger to appear in the 350-card base set for 2020 Topps Series 1, a checklist of which was released this morning.

That's right, the ONLY Texas Ranger.

I did the count and the Rangers, with Solak shouldering the entire load, come up a distant 30th behind the 29th-place Orioles, who have a more typical seven cards.

Here is the breakdown by team that I compiled earlier:

Dodgers - 17
Astros - 17
Nationals - 16
Cubs - 15
Athletics - 14
Brewers - 14
Indians - 14
White Sox - 14
Phillies - 13
Angels - 12
Blue Jays - 12
Braves - 12
Padres - 12
Red Sox - 12
Reds - 12
Twins - 12
Yankees - 12
Cardinals - 11
Giants - 11
Marlins - 11
Mets - 11
Diamondbacks - 10
Mariners - 10
Rays - 10
Tigers - 10
Royals - 9
Pirates -…