Skip to main content

Cardboard appreciation: 1975 Topps Bobby Murcer

(Children: we are currently in the midst of the best week of the entire year. I totally intend to enjoy it in every way possible. Now, before I have me some more enjoyment, it's time for Cardboard Appreciation. This is the 72nd in a series. You are excused):


I want the National League to win tonight's game very badly.

I don't like it when people dismiss the All-Star Game as a worthless exhibition. It wasn't a worthless exhibition in the 1970s when the N.L. was pulverizing the A.L. The National League players truly wanted to win the game.

I know things are different now, and a lot of players don't seem to care and act like it's an exhibition. There are deserving pitchers who won't attend basically because they're perfectly healthy. Tell me if that makes sense.

But I still care and I still like National League baseball better than American League baseball. I know that makes me old-fashioned and backward and whatever phrase you use to slander the elderly, but I don't care. The National League needs to win the damn game.

So, in a feeble attempt to send some luck across the continent, I'm posting one of my favorite All-Star cards of all-time, from a period when the N.L. won All-Star Games frequently. In fact, if it wasn't for the Ron Cey card of the same year, it would be my favorite All-Star card ever.

This card is well-known for what Topps did to it. But in case you haven't heard, I'll fill in the blanks.

In 1974, Bobby Murcer was a star player for the Yankees. Another Bobby -- Bobby Bonds -- was a star player for the Giants. Both were vaunted prospects from the time they entered the league.

But at the end of the season, on Oct. 22, 1974, they were traded for each other.

Unlike today's later deadlines, Topps had all of the photos ready for their 1975 set by the end of October. Murcer was ready to go as a Yankee and Bonds was ready to go as a Giant.

So, Topps did what it did back in 1974. It went to the local grade school, plucked a sixth-grader out of class, and told him/her to paint Bonds and Murcer into their new uniforms.

The Bonds was bad enough. But the Murcer is one of the worst ever.

The cap on Murcer's head is not great -- the accurate, yet obviously painted, interlocking S and F. But the worst part is that Topps forgot two important details.

1. Yankee Stadium is probably the most recognizable stadium in the world and it is in plain view in the photo on this card. In the days before interleague, there is no way a San Francisco Giant would be in Yankee Stadium.

2. The star on the card says Murcer is an American League All-Star. So, the front of the card states that Murcer made the A.L. All-Star team as a GIANT.

Wow. It's a good thing I didn't see this card as a kid because my brain would have exploded on the spot.

Unlike the back of the Bonds card, there is no mention of the trade on the back of the Murcer card. In fact, it mentions Murcer's American League participation in the all-star game again. So, just in case you didn't believe the front, Topps is telling you: DAMMIT, Murcer played for the American League as a Giant!

There have been a lot of lies on cardboard, but this has to be one of the biggest.

Enjoy the game everyone. I'll be watching every second.

If the N.L. wins, I'll be ecstatic. If the N.L. loses, I'll be crushed. Times are different, but the N.L. will always rule here.

Comments

  1. Go NL! WW Jr. and I were talking last night; he's ten and has never seen an NL win....time for that to end!

    One other thing about the Murcer card; the picture would have been from 1973 since the Yankees were playing in Shea in 1974. If Topps would have used a photo from '74, with Shea in the background, the card might have been a little more believable.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember that trade. You had a Yankee hero from Oklahoma, who started out as a shortstop traded for a flashy, speedy, powerful centerfielder from the Giants. Not quite Mantle for Mays, but as close as we were going to get it in 1975.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for featuring an SF Giant (I know how you feel about 'em); first time ever? Bobby M didn't enjoy his time there very much. -- MrHaverkamp

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Not done with baseball but so done with 2019 baseball cards

I stayed true to my vow to avoid viewing most of the League Championship Series. After the NLDS debacle, my heart wasn't in another round of baseball.

I did sit down for a little bit of Game 4 of the Nats-Cards and, of course, I had to watch the highlights of Game 6 of the Astros-Yankees.

But that was about it, and I placed a "TBD" on the World Series, too. "We'll see how I feel," I said.

Well, the World Series starts tomorrow and I fully plan to watch it -- at least the portions that do not air when I am at work. I've decided that I'm just not done with baseball yet. The Astros-Nationals appeals to me a bit just because of all the fantastic starting pitching matchups. So, baseball, you're off the hook. I'll still watch you.

Your trading card sets, however ...

That's another matter.

I'm finished with buying 2019 cards. I knew that a few weeks ago, probably a few months ago. But it hit home when I was opening the five loose packs of …

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:


 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…