Skip to main content

Moooooooooooooooookie!!!


Somewhere during the 1980 baseball season, I became aware of a player named "Mookie."

Mookie!

What a terrific name. You just didn't come across unusual first names like you do these days (every day at my workplace, it's like: "OK, so that's how we're spelling 'Jasmine' now?").

Mookie was called up to the Mets in September of 1980 and, wow, was it different viewing someone named "Mookie" on my television.


This card is practically iconic, thanks to the arrival of Mookie Wilson on cardboard.

But it still wasn't as fantastic as this card:


I pulled this card of this Mookie character in one of the first packs of 1981 Donruss I ever bought. I was entranced.

I mean, what decade was this?  Cards by something called "Donruss"? Players named "Mookie"? Man, the '80s are gonna be weird!

For years I hoped that somehow the Mets would trade Mookie Wilson to the Dodgers. I liked speedsters anyway and Mookie would liven up a team with a whole lot of Steves and Rons and Bills and Dons. (We did have a Dusty though!)

It never happened. And my Mookie dream died when his career ended in 1991. The Dodgers would never, ever have a player named Mookie.

Except ...

Isn't the future grand?

The Dodgers DO have a player named Mookie on their team now. In crazy news that caused me to tear up half the planned cover of Wednesday's sports section last night and try again, the Dodgers obtained Mookie Betts and David Price from the Red Sox in a three-way deal that also involved the Twins. Then, separately, to clear some outfield space (and, no doubt some salary), they sent Joc Pederson to the Angels for Luis Rengifo and some prospects -- or at least they're working on that deal anyway.

I am thrilled.

The Dodgers have obtained some big blockbuster players over the past 10 years, from Manny Ramirez to Adrian Gonzalez to Yu Darvish to Manny Machado. Only Ramirez matches the excitement level I felt when I heard the news of Betts (bumping the Padres out of a potential deal makes me even more pleased).

I already can't wait to pull the first Mookie Betts Dodgers cards. But I will be waiting for the traditional card versions -- not Topps Now stuff.

As it is now, I have just 21 cards of Betts. I don't own his rookie card, mostly because I stopped buying 2014 Topps fairly quickly because I didn't like the way it looked.

Interestingly, 11 of the 21 cards are from last year, probably because Topps bombed us with Betts cards after he won the MVP award in 2018.


This one is my favorite. I usually give up Red Sox cards pretty readily in dealing with Red Sox collectors -- they did beat my team in the World Series, you know -- but I've hung on to this one.



Of course, this one is the best piece of cardboard that Betts has ever appeared on thus far.

As for earlier cards, not much stands out in my collection.


That's from 2015 Stadium Club, from before he started growing facial hair.



There he is robbing someone in center.



Mookie is in my Allen & Ginter frankenset. So is David Price, just one page over from Betts.



In 2016, Betts appeared on the 1979 design in Archives. I collected the whole '79 portion of the set because I enjoyed it so much.

I did the same thing with 2019 Archives, with the 1975 design portion of the set. Unfortunately, Betts wasn't in that part.


He appears in the 1958-themed section. Still a handsome card. It's nice to have Archives and Heritage so we can see players as we once saw them on cards, instead of the constant action of the last three decades.

My favorite part of this trade is how well the Dodgers front office maneuvered, protecting all of their top prospects from being dealt even though I'm sure teams inquired about many of them. But the Dodgers still hung on to Lux, May, Downs, Gonsolin, Smith, Ruiz, Gray, etc.

Yeah, the Dodgers dealt Pederson, Kenta Maeda and Alex Verdugo, all key parts of the Dodgers' postseason runs of the last two years. But all were expendable. Pederson and Maeda had their up-and-down moments and even with some notable World Series achievements for both, you need to consider that Betts is pretty much the best position player out there not named Mike Trout. I think the F.O. did well.

In the process of all the trade rumor talk, just about every Dodger not named Kershaw, Buehler or Bellinger was mentioned as potential trade fodder. One that got me a little nervous was the possibility that Corey Seager was on the move. That's because I just acquired my first Corey Seager autograph recently.


That's an interesting card. Kind of weird how it's an autographed card that is picturing an autographed card.

This came from Twitter friend Mark, and I was pretty happy to fill a hole in my collection of Dodger autographs (I would like to get one of each player, but that is a very casual, whenever I get to it, project).

Keeping Seager on the Dodgers adds to a potent lineup that may look something like this:

RF Betts
SS Seager
3B Turner
CF Bellinger
1B Muncy
LF Pollock
C Smith
2B Lux

Of course, the Dodgers swap players out like crazy so I'm sure we'll see that configuration maybe once all season. But, still, it's a stacked lineup.

Whether it gets the Dodgers that long-awaited World Series title, I don't know. Nobody does. The starting pitchers still need to last longer in the postseason than they've done. The relief pitchers still need to not suck. And the hitters need to be more consistent than they have been.

My hope is that Betts will help this along.

If not, well, at least I'll be able to shout "MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKIE" at my TV all season long.

I've wanted to do that since I was 15 years old.

Comments

Brett Alan said…
I wish that Betts had ended up in the rightful, historic home of baseball Mookies, but there are worse places for him to be. Happily I did pull his base rookie card (from a discount blaster a couple years after the fact, I believe) and I've bought up quite a few of his cards from dime boxes, including much of the all-Betts insert set from last year.
GCA said…
Ah, that will make me like him much more now that he is out of the AL East.

Here's how much I stay on top of baseball news, even though football is done now. Your post is the first I've heard of this trade! I'll still be more into hockey until April.

I was going to say how silly it was that Bowman did a "Then & Now" on a player that was a rookie only a couple years ago, but then I looked it up and that Seager rookie auto is from back in 2012. Didn't seem like that long ago. Again, I'm the "anti-collector" in that rookies are pretty much the least of my cardboard concerns. (Anti-hype collector maybe).
Lee Hero said…
Hell, I pulled the base of that Seager autograph out of a pack and upon first glance got all excited because I thought it was autographed, lol.

I'm pretty stoked about the possibilities with Mookie in the lineup. I'm gonna miss the guys we lost alot, especially Verdugo.
You really don't want that Seager auto, just go ahead and send it my way. LOL.
BaseSetCalling said…
didja at least get excited later on when the Dodgers got their first Hubie?

(and is that triple Rookie Card in the Cardboard Appreciation series somewhere?)
Matt said…
This one is going to hurt for awhile.

He's a special player, and you're really going to enjoy seeing what he can do on a nightly basis.
Doc Samson said…
Congrats on your squad obtaining Mookie, Mr. Owl. I remember a time when these blockbuster trades were so far and few between. I believe that Jimmy Carter was in office...
Fuji said…
When I hear the name Mookie... I think of the movie Do The Right Thing. As for the trade, I've got mixed feelings about it. I wish Mookie would have signed an extension and become a lifelong Red Sox, because I like seeing players stay with one franchise. But I'm happy he's not headed to the Evil Empire. Not that the Sox would trade them to their rivals. I just hope that he doesn't end up leaving LA to sign with the Yankees next year.

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:



1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…

Gimme that corn and cheese

Someone posted a card on Twitter yesterday that I couldn't quite place for an instant.

It was a card of a bunch of Expos posed together with the sun setting behind them and a wonderfully descriptive logo in the corner. And then I remembered:

Ah, yes, its from my favorite Upper Deck set of all-time, the '93 set.


There were all kinds of crazy, wild things going on inside the 1993 Upper Deck set -- INSIDE, the set, not outside, like today where interesting stuff is reserved for inserts and short-prints. Yes, '93 UD did have inserts, too, but the regular cards, the subset cards (remember those?) were so funky that you barely cared whether you saw the inserts.

"Teammates/Team Stars" is one of the many subsets within '93 Upper Deck. The theme is simple: get some guys together from the same team for a photo and slap a goofy name and logo on the card to sum them up.

Upper Deck did that for every team and made them as staged and dopey as possible.

But I love that stu…