Skip to main content

My kind of box break


When I opened a box of 1989 Fleer last fall, people assumed I would pull duplicates from the box, discussing the different variations of the Billy Ripken card that might come out, etc.

But I knew I wouldn't pull any duplicates because boxes of cards didn't operate like that in the '80s. A few days ago I found myself watching a box break of 1992 Bowman, just because I still need some of the Dodgers from that set, and the duplicates that came out made me think of how much the '90s ruined collectors' ideas about collation. Not even four years after '89 Fleer produced no duplicates in 36 packs, box breaks were a disaster of pulling four Jeff Juden cards in a matter of minutes.

I don't really do box breaks anymore, mostly because of the price but also because there's no chance of getting close to a complete set. Even 7 or 8 years ago when I was opening boxes of Allen & Ginter, which actually didn't yield any duplicates, I'd still finish and think to myself, "I've still got a third of the set to go!"

No, the pay out often isn't worth it if you're not going to get a complete set, or at least near one.

That's why I enjoyed opening the above little box so much. It was sent to me by reader Alan as kind of a throw-in contained inside an enormous box of items that you'll see some day soon (it's taking me forever to get it scanned). I've never opened one of these 1980s Fleer boxed sets, although I've seen plenty of the cards in my time.

Alan sent three different Fleer boxes. I decided to feature this one because I like the 1987 Record Setters design. It's simple and does well showcasing the player.

As you can see on the box, it's an "Eckerd exclusive." Yes, I remember Eckerd's. I've purchased cards at Eckerd's. It's distressing how many places that sold cards have disappeared, while a whole mess of places that don't sell cards still exist.

But anyway, this box contains six logo stickers and 44 trading cards. There are only 44 trading cards in the set. Hot dog! What more could you ask?

Let's see them:


OK, we'll start with the six stickers. Quite a random assortment. I have so many of these Fleer things, I need to find some place suitable for sticking.



Those are the first nine cards out of the box. It's interesting how they come out of the box. They aren't in alphabetical order or ordered by number on the back (The set actually is numbered according to alphabetical order of the player). I'm already enjoying all the different looks of familiar players.



The set recognizes "baseball's record setters," but there's nothing on the back stating what record the player has set. It simply shows the player's career stats, which can be found on the regular Fleer cards, too.



To me, a 44-card set is a perfect sampling of major league players of the day. It's kind of like the Kellogg's sets of the 1970s. Kellogg's capped its sets at under 60 cards, but that didn't prevent it from putting players like Bill Almon or Jeff Burroughs in the set. And that's how it should be -- I see enough of Wade Boggs and Tony Gwynn, give me a Bill Gullickson card! A Gene Garber card!



Everything you need here -- Fleer's wacky poses, strange cropping and the very good players of the day. However, I do love how Fleer zoomed out on some of these images, such as on Joe Orsulak and Ozzie Guillen.



And, just like that the box break is finished and the set is COMPLETE.

You can't beat that. Sure, it's a tiny, tiny box break, but when you're done, there is still the satisfaction of completing a set.

And that is my kind of box break.

Comments

Kin said…
Had this set as a kid....AWESOME!
Commishbob said…
That set was one of the better box sets around in those days. I really liked that Murray card, among others.
Old Cards said…
Nice looking cards with a lot of star power. The poses don't seem wacky to me.
Bulldog said…
They don't tell the records broken - crazy. Fun random set. I enjoy seeing these guys on wax I've never seen before. Good stuff.
sg488 said…
Excellant box break,maybe your next one could be 1987 Toys R Us.
Fuji said…
Although I would have liked to see Gwynn in this set... I totally agree that it's nice to see guys like Garber, Fernandez, and Oglivie in this set. And those zoomed out photos are awesome!
Matt said…
I picked up the Rich Gedman card recently, and had to look up the record he set. When Clemens struck out 20 batters, by default Gedman set the record of putouts by a catcher!
Yeah, that was thing back in the late 80's Fleer sets, same old players. I still have tons of this stuff laying around back home. When you get an itch to open some lmk.
Unknown said…
I bought this set in 1987. It was one of the first complete sets I ever bought.
gregory said…
Looks a little bit like a modified 1984 Fleer design, doesn't it? I enjoy these types of sets from the 1980s, for sure. Just finished "building" a Kay Bee set from a few trades.
acrackedbat said…
This set is in my 80s binder. I like the player assortment with the Gaetti being my fave card here. I love love love the stickers!

Popular posts from this blog

The pop culture tax

This isn't really a complaint, just something interesting that I've been noticing.

I'm working on wrapping up a couple of '70s-centric sets right now, getting down to those last 10-20-30 cards, and the usual candidates are being evasive.

I wish I could pick up all the stars early in my set-building quests so the end of the build isn't quite so painful but it never ends up that way. The best of the best usually take the most effort. But I expect that.

What always surprises me is some of the other players that end up being the final few.

Take, for instance, the 1977 Kellogg's set that I'm now trying to complete. I picked up three more cards from that set from Sportlots. The Jose "Cheo" Cruz card was one of them.



The other two were Dodgers, already in my Dodger binders but that doesn't help me complete the set now, does it?

I would've liked to add more with this most recent order but most of the other wants simply weren't available. Here…

Binder, top loader or box?

I want to address two different card package arrivals that don't have much in common other than that one thing that every arriving card package has in common, which is:

How will I store these?

It comes down to three ways: binder, top loader or box.

These means of packaging, storing and presenting are not the same. Ideally, every last card in my collection would be living in a binder. That's my favorite storage method. They're accessible. The cards are presented nicely within. They're very good for categorizing and we card collectors sure do love to categorize. They look good visually when entering the room and when opening the binder.

But I don't have the room for a binder for every card. I can't even process what they would look like. Some edition of "Hoarders," I'm sure.

So the cards that are not deemed "worthy" of a binder -- and, yes, I hate that we're prioritizing like this -- go in a box.

Boxes are for sets that I'm not co…

Yaz, Doc and that other guy

I am not a dedicated player collector because it doesn't fit into how I view baseball and how my collection reflects the history of baseball. Set collecting and team collecting, I believe, do a better job of telling you what's going on in the sport in any given year. And that's important to me.

During my less kind moments, I consider player collecting "stalker-ish," but I do see the value in gathering cards of specific players. I do it myself, but it's a low-key pursuit. There is no drive behind it and no real goals.

The fact is, I do admire certain players instinctively or subconsciously, players who never played for my favorite team.

So, when Jeff of Wax Pack Wonders offered one of his latest giveaways, presented in a very player-collector friendly format, I actually took part, and I didn't pick exclusively Dodgers either.

(Confession time: I didn't pick exclusively Dodgers because my Dodgers collection is a bit, shall we say, "advanced" a…