Skip to main content

My kind of box break

When I opened a box of 1989 Fleer last fall, people assumed I would pull duplicates from the box, discussing the different variations of the Billy Ripken card that might come out, etc.

But I knew I wouldn't pull any duplicates because boxes of cards didn't operate like that in the '80s. A few days ago I found myself watching a box break of 1992 Bowman, just because I still need some of the Dodgers from that set, and the duplicates that came out made me think of how much the '90s ruined collectors' ideas about collation. Not even four years after '89 Fleer produced no duplicates in 36 packs, box breaks were a disaster of pulling four Jeff Juden cards in a matter of minutes.

I don't really do box breaks anymore, mostly because of the price but also because there's no chance of getting close to a complete set. Even 7 or 8 years ago when I was opening boxes of Allen & Ginter, which actually didn't yield any duplicates, I'd still finish and think to myself, "I've still got a third of the set to go!"

No, the pay out often isn't worth it if you're not going to get a complete set, or at least near one.

That's why I enjoyed opening the above little box so much. It was sent to me by reader Alan as kind of a throw-in contained inside an enormous box of items that you'll see some day soon (it's taking me forever to get it scanned). I've never opened one of these 1980s Fleer boxed sets, although I've seen plenty of the cards in my time.

Alan sent three different Fleer boxes. I decided to feature this one because I like the 1987 Record Setters design. It's simple and does well showcasing the player.

As you can see on the box, it's an "Eckerd exclusive." Yes, I remember Eckerd's. I've purchased cards at Eckerd's. It's distressing how many places that sold cards have disappeared, while a whole mess of places that don't sell cards still exist.

But anyway, this box contains six logo stickers and 44 trading cards. There are only 44 trading cards in the set. Hot dog! What more could you ask?

Let's see them:

OK, we'll start with the six stickers. Quite a random assortment. I have so many of these Fleer things, I need to find some place suitable for sticking.

Those are the first nine cards out of the box. It's interesting how they come out of the box. They aren't in alphabetical order or ordered by number on the back (The set actually is numbered according to alphabetical order of the player). I'm already enjoying all the different looks of familiar players.

The set recognizes "baseball's record setters," but there's nothing on the back stating what record the player has set. It simply shows the player's career stats, which can be found on the regular Fleer cards, too.

To me, a 44-card set is a perfect sampling of major league players of the day. It's kind of like the Kellogg's sets of the 1970s. Kellogg's capped its sets at under 60 cards, but that didn't prevent it from putting players like Bill Almon or Jeff Burroughs in the set. And that's how it should be -- I see enough of Wade Boggs and Tony Gwynn, give me a Bill Gullickson card! A Gene Garber card!

Everything you need here -- Fleer's wacky poses, strange cropping and the very good players of the day. However, I do love how Fleer zoomed out on some of these images, such as on Joe Orsulak and Ozzie Guillen.

And, just like that the box break is finished and the set is COMPLETE.

You can't beat that. Sure, it's a tiny, tiny box break, but when you're done, there is still the satisfaction of completing a set.

And that is my kind of box break.


Kin said…
Had this set as a kid....AWESOME!
Commishbob said…
That set was one of the better box sets around in those days. I really liked that Murray card, among others.
Old Cards said…
Nice looking cards with a lot of star power. The poses don't seem wacky to me.
Bulldog said…
They don't tell the records broken - crazy. Fun random set. I enjoy seeing these guys on wax I've never seen before. Good stuff.
sg488 said…
Excellant box break,maybe your next one could be 1987 Toys R Us.
Fuji said…
Although I would have liked to see Gwynn in this set... I totally agree that it's nice to see guys like Garber, Fernandez, and Oglivie in this set. And those zoomed out photos are awesome!
Matt said…
I picked up the Rich Gedman card recently, and had to look up the record he set. When Clemens struck out 20 batters, by default Gedman set the record of putouts by a catcher!
Yeah, that was thing back in the late 80's Fleer sets, same old players. I still have tons of this stuff laying around back home. When you get an itch to open some lmk.
Unknown said…
I bought this set in 1987. It was one of the first complete sets I ever bought.
gregory said…
Looks a little bit like a modified 1984 Fleer design, doesn't it? I enjoy these types of sets from the 1980s, for sure. Just finished "building" a Kay Bee set from a few trades.
acrackedbat said…
This set is in my 80s binder. I like the player assortment with the Gaetti being my fave card here. I love love love the stickers!

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:

1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…


I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…