Skip to main content

XYZ, PDQ


Before the 2019 cards came out, when we were feverish with anticipation, Ben of Cardboard Icons made a discovery when looking at a mock-up of Clayton Kershaw's Topps flagship card.

Glance pant-ward and you will see what appears to be a zipper down. At some point during the game, Clayton did not examine his zipper.

Nobody caught the snafu on the mockup. So this ended up appearing on Kershaw's actual card, which you see above. So there's Kershaw on his baseball card for 2019, caught with his zipper down.

I recently acquired this card from Max of Starting Nine in the most recent envelope he sent me. I was half hoping that it didn't look as glaring as it did on scans I've seen, but, yup, it sure looks like pants need zipping.

Now, it's really not that big of deal. What's the crime if your pants aren't zipped? People are wearing underclothes, I hope. This just seems like an excuse for third-graders to get nasty. But at the same time -- zounds, Topps -- this is the photo you chose?

Topps gets its pictures from Getty Images and I've gone on Getty Images and checked out the photo. It's from the Dodgers' first game of the season last year against the Giants at Dodger Stadium. There were several other photos of Kershaw pitching in that game with no visible sign of his zipper being unzipped. Yet Topps didn't pick one of those.

Here's a nice photo from another game last year, available for the same cost of the unzipped Kershaw photo:


How come Topps didn't pick that one? This would be excellent.

I haven't been impressed with Kershaw's flagship cards in Topps since the 2015 card. (One of his league leader cards in 2018 flagship was pretty nice). It just seems Topps could have selected better every year and there certainly are plenty of images of Kershaw available.

But maybe Topps only gets to select certain photos from Getty. Or maybe they're saving the shot above or some other one for Stadium Club. Or maybe -- and this is annoying -- Topps is saving better photo stuff for short-prints and super-short-prints. Oh, boy!

It's just rather disappointing is all.

Here are some other cards from Max that I needed:


If you care (and the vast majority of you don't), that's my second "When Puigs Fly" card. I might have to accumulate as many of those as I can. It's also my second '73 Kellogg's Osteen card, but I will be completing ALL off those '70s Kellogg's sets some day.

Kersh deserves better than he gets sometimes. All the heckling about not being able to win the World Series. Focusing on his postseason ERA. Mocking one of the best pitchers of this generation, who does so much more for people of this world than win games for Dodger fan base. I can't help but think of that when I see his 2019 card.

All right, that's it for now. I'm going to zip it.

Comments

Nachos Grande said…
And here, based on the blog title, I was expecting a lot of math with multiple variables.
steelehere said…
I thought this was going to be a Claude Raymond 1966 and 1967 Topps zipper open post when I read the first few sentences.

https://www.psacard.com/cardfacts/baseball-cards/1966-topps/claude-raymond-586/30952
https://www.psacard.com/cardfacts/baseball-cards/1967-topps/claude-raymond-364/31343
night owl said…
Well, in that case, Clayton is in good company.
Fuji said…
Topps totally should have used that other Kershaw image. That is one heck of an action shot.
acrackedbat said…
i spy the fly. This could've been an action shot too but fate would not have it.
Defenders50 said…
I mean if this was an Upper Deck card with their hatred of the Dodgers and all, then this would make sense, but I don't think Topps has the same LAD baggage.
jacobmrley said…
If I'd know I was sending porn in the mail, I would have covered it in a plain brown wrapper.
Unknown said…
Hey I have the 1990 Topps box set cards dodgers had the most player cards in it also have a duke Snyder ,peewee Reese ,Sandy Koufax ,fernie valenzuela.do you know if there is any value to any of them
Unknown said…
The comment above is mine new to this stuff sorry

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:



1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…

Eighties

I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…