Skip to main content

Awesome night card, pt. 222: filler is a killer

A couple of people have weighed in on the recent Topps announcement that it is extending the 2015 base set by 20 cards per series. Instead of 330 cards, as has been the case since 2006, I believe, Series 1 and Series 2 will be 350 cards.

Of course, there is a lot of speculation about what Topps will do with those extra 20 cards. I don't really care what Topps does with them because I don't collect the base set anymore. If Topps surprises me and produces a 20-card "turn back the clock" subset, then you will hear some giddy noises from me. But throwing in 20 extra relief pitchers isn't going to bring back Topps Total. And expanding so there can be a fourth card of Mike Trout or a 20-card Derek Jeter tribute is merely what everyone expects.

Where my "concern" -- and I use that word lightly -- lies is in what Topps does with the Update set. Will that set, which also has been 330 cards the last few years, be 350 cards, too? Because that thing is already bloated at least 100 cards beyond what it should be.

Update is Topps' version of a fast food buffet. Yes, you can have as many cards as you like. Multiple helpings of cards. Go ahead! Gorge yourself! But you don't really need them. They serve no purpose beyond the 230 calories ... er, cards .. that really need to be there.

Since Topps can't fill the Update set without filler now, what is it going to do with the set with 20 extra cards?

In recent years I have been relieved to see that the lame combo cards disappeared out of Update. Now my quest is to get rid of the useless Home Run Derby cards.

The Home Run Derby should represented by one card. See that Ryan Howard card from 2006 Update? That's the only mention of the 2006 HR Derby necessary. Put a nice little write-up on the derby on the back with the results -- doing it in tabular or graphic form would be more interesting than a simple paragraph, by the way -- and you're done. With one card.

Instead of doing this:

What a waste of good artificial cardboard.

I believe every participant is represented there. Normally, I applaud being thorough, but not only is this pointless and overblown, but it's really, ugly. Only a lover of '91 Fleer could enjoy these cards.

Once I returned to collecting, I attempted to complete Update only in 2006. After I saw what was involved, I bought less and less of it in ensuing years.

I don't know if the set represents the HR Derby as thoroughly as it did in '06, but I know that there are still too many cards devoted to it. I still buy some Update packs because I like to see people in new uniforms -- shocking view of Update, I know -- and too many HR Derby cards fall out.

This is what I ended up with from last year's Update purchases. That's four cards too many because none of them won the HR Derby. Also, it's way too many opportunities to show people swinging a bat without wearing a cap, which should never be allowed.

There's the guy that did win it, and that's not technically a HR Derby card, but a checklist card, because there's another card of Cespedes (in basically the same pose) that's his HR Derby card.

Got all that?

The Update set would be so much more succinct, so much more collectable, if there was just one card celebrating the HR Derby. A nice posed shot with the winner and the trophy, like ol' Ryan up there, would be just perfect. Remember the card of Kurt Bevacqua blowing the bubble? That was a meaningless tournament, too. And Topps confined it to a single card, now one of the most popular cards in the entire 1976 set.

I can only imagine how useless that card would be today if there was a card for every player that competed in that bubble gum blowing contest. Yeah, I know that sounds cool right now, but trust me, it'd get lame very quickly.

So, that's my "concern" with expanding the set -- that is, if Topps is going to do that with Update, too.

But I won't be trying to complete it, so, you know, don't listen to me.


Night Card Binder candidate: Ryan Howard, 2006 Topps Updates and Highlights, #UH283
Does it make the binder?: It does (and I shudder to think how many HR Derby cards are already in the binder).


deal said…
Dammit I really want a Johnny Oates Bubble Gum competitor card now.
Unknown said…
Speaking of the Bubble Gum card, I just picked it up at a Local card show this morning for .....wait for it....wait for it.... yes a Dime.
Ana Lu said…
When Topps lose the 'exclusive' tag we see what they come up with. They have to change something. They are getting too much into routine and do nothing out-of-the-box.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Return of the king

(If you haven't voted for your favorite Bert Campaneris '70s card in the last post, I invite you to do so).

So you've been away for a few years and want everyone to know that you're back.

How do you do that?

Do what The Diamond King did when he returned to card blogging last month: Bombard readers with contests and giveaways! Well, you've certainly gotten MY attention, sir!

I'll start with the giveaways first. Since he returned, the Diamond King has issued multiple "Diamond King 9" giveaways, straight out of the chute and rapid fire in the last month-plus. As I've said before, I am very slow to get to these "first come, first serve" giveaways. I used to think "I spend too much time on the computer" and now I realize "I don't spend enough time on the computer at all!"

But I was able to nab two cards out of the many giveaways.

I won this key 1981 Fleer Star Sticker of The Hawk. I have since acquired several more &#…