Skip to main content

It amused me, so I bought it

I was touring cards online a week or two ago when I stumbled across this beauty. I have a reasonably thorough knowledge of the '69 Topps set, so I'm not sure why I was seeing it for the first time.

The more astute collector would notice that Cap Peterson is not wearing an Indians uniform. He is wearing a Giants uniform. And the even more astute collector would know that Peterson had not played for the Giants since 1966. He played for the Senators for two years after the Giants!

But never mind all of that. That's not why I bought it.

I bought it because it's Cap Peterson. And he's not wearing a cap!

This instantly makes this one of the best cards in the entire 1969 Topps set. You can have your final Mickey Mantle card, both the white and yellow letters. You can have your Reggie Jackson, your Seaver, your Ryan, your Clemente, your Fingers rookie, your first Pilots players.

None of them dared to do what Peterson did. He donned the nickname Cap, but did not wear "A Cap". That is the definition of bad-ass. Or maybe it's hipster. I don't know, it's just so amusing I can't stand it.

I was curious whether Peterson had ever mocked his nickname (his real name was Charles, by the way) on past cards. It turns out he did. Here are his other cards:

I think you saw it there.

Peterson first started trolling collectors by abandoning his cap in the 1967 set. Right around the Summer of Love. Figures. Damn hippie.

As it turns out, 1969 would be Peterson's last season. He hit only .227 in 76 games for the Indians.

So on Cap Peterson's last card, he is not wearing a cap.

Hat's off, Mr. Peterson.


That is brilliant, and a Giants card too, so I get to own it someday. Now...explain why they used a three year old photo on the 69 set...reaaaaady...go!
acrackedbat said…
Great selection! The missing CAP is what I noticed first. Hats off to you, N.O. - love the humor!
Anonymous said…
Nice post! Nice catch on the cap! :)
Anonymous said…
Wow, a capless Cap is almost as good as Podres with the Padres! Will the wonders of 1969 Topps never cease?

The cherry on top: The Senators traded capless Cap to the Indians for minor leaguer Woody Woodson.

In honor of this card, we should all listen to Del Shannon's "Hats Off To Larry".

OK, I think I'm done now.
Fuji said…
Great post. What's next? Shoeless Joe Jackson w/shoes?
Bo said…
Actually, on that '68 card he's wearing a helmet, not a cap. Has there every been a major leaguer named Helmut?
I actually LOL'ed when reading that.
This makes me think that someone should do a whole post on Roy Face, Bill Hands, Rollie Fingers, Barry Foote, Phil Knuckles, Arnold Earley, and Jim Ray Hart.
Jamie Meyers said…
Don't forget Rock Shoulders, who is a minor leaguer in the Cubs' chain.
CaptKirk42 said…
He's wearing a Giants uni in just about all of them. The '68 seems to be the only one he isn't wearing a Giants uniform in.
Mark Hoyle said…
Any cards of Cap Anson
Field of Cards said…
Chris Capuano brims.

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:

1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…


I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…