Skip to main content

I don't know what I want

This is well-traveled territory, but I'm trying to make a determination for myself. So, consider this an internal conversation, and if you still want to come along, well, welcome to the random meanderings of my brain.

I make a lot of noise on this blog about how much I enjoy variety. In fact, going back years and years, before this blog, before the internet, I've often said how much I like variety. I like choices. Food buffets -- and yes, now I've mentioned food buffets on consecutive posts -- are terrific. Going to the paint store is a joy because I can look at all of the color samples. I enjoy city living, because the options for entertainment are so varied and fit any mood I have. And, as far as baseball cards, you know that my collection includes vintage, modern, oddball, whatever you like.

But do I really like variety? I get confused shopping in the grocery store. If I have to buy something with which I'm not familiar -- say, yogurt or coffee supplies -- the sheer variety of choices stuns me into inaction. I can barely absorb what I am seeing. A restaurant with a large menu makes me want to rip it into thirds because I can't process what I see and my stomach is getting angry. And I'm dreading the day that I need to buy a new phone. Thank goodness I have a teenage daughter who can be my personal shopper.

In fact, in all of the instances in the above paragraph I can see myself yelling (either out loud or to myself) "I don't know what I want!"

And the same thing can be said for variety in general: Do I know what I want?

Which is it? Do I enjoy variety or don't I?

Well, I think there's a line that I could draw. I like variety ... to a point. But when you step over that line -- when you throw "7 ways to pay" at me with 27 exclamation points -- then I don't like it anymore.

And if I had to come up with a name for that line, I think I would call it:

"1995 Upper Deck"

In terms of cards, I think this is the point where I am endlessly confused about the variety that is available.

I wasn't really collecting in 1995 -- I certainly had no idea how many card options there were that year -- but when I came back to collecting about eight years ago and filled myself in on what I had missed, it took me the longest to absorb what happened in the mid-1990s.

This is what we were dealing with in 1995 with Upper Deck (and forgive me if I missed some sets. Too much variety causes things to fall out of my brain):

That was the 1995 Upper Deck base set. Nice-looking cards. I would have been happy with just collecting those.

Of course, the year prior, Upper Deck came up with a parallel called "electric diamond," and they were back for 1995. This is one of them. We'll call this "1995 UD-ED." Get UD some Viagra.

Also, for a second year in a row, Upper Deck put out a "young collector's" set, called Collector's Choice. Let's call it "1995 UD-CC"

Collector's Choice also added a silver signature parallel in '94 and it returned for 1995. I believe there was also a gold parallel, but I don't have any of those. We'll call the silver parallel "1995 UD-CC-SS"

New in 1995 was a blue-bordered Collector's Choice parallel, called "Special Edition," or what I call "1995 UD-CC-SE"

But for the longest time I would get it confused with this '95 Upper Deck set:

This was a separate set, called "Special Edition". Why "special edition" was used for two sets in the same year, I'll never know. But this one I note as "1995 UD-SE"

But before I forget, there was also an Upper Deck minor league set in 1995:

It looked a lot like the base set, except with silver foil instead of gold.

And, of course, there was a parallel of that, called "future stock." I'll call these "1995 UD-ML" and "1995 UD-ML-FS"

Oops, I almost forgot the 1995 Upper Deck Collector's Choice game set. I usually note this as "1995 UD-CC-Play"

We're still not done.

Upper Deck, for the third year in a row, issued a premium set called "SP." I believe this stands for "super premium" but you should have seen my face when I first thought I had figured out that "SP" meant "short-print" and then these cards showed up at my door. I thought it was an entire set of short-prints.

This set I call "1995 UD-SP"

And, of course, by the mid-1990s it was decided that no premium set was worth squat unless it had a parallel and here is one right now. This I call "1995 UD-SP-s".

But Upper Deck didn't think that was enough of a selection, so they added a set called "Championship" to "SP". That's right, a whole offshoot to the offshoot.

I call this "1995 UD-SP-CS"

The Championship set was so exclusive that it had to have a parallel, too. They were diecuts. And they are called "1995 UD-SP-CS-DC". Got all that?

And now comes the trade post portion of the show.

Into my addled brain arrived these cards from Julie of A Cracked Bat:

"Wait a minute," I thought. "I have these cards already."

It turned out I didn't. The ones I had were the diecut versions. My want list was correct and Julie read my want list correctly.

So, I happily crossed off those numbers, even though I didn't even know I needed them.

And while I was crossing off the numbers, I came across what I believe is this card:

Other than knowing that this comes from the SP set, I don't fully know what this is. I don't know if there is a non-diecut version of the card or whether this is a subset of the SP set. I hope it's not part of the Championship series because there's nothing on the card to indicate that.

But I hurriedly erased what I think is the number for this card from my want list because I have been receiving this card in packages for probably 3 or 4 years. It's obvious that people are seeing this card somewhere on my want list and sending it to me. I've received it much too frequently for it to be random.

This is what happens when I deal with too much variety. I can't even tell you which cards I need and which ones I have already.

So hopefully, erasing the number will put an end to that.

Oh ...

That '95 Upper Deck set -- whatever set it is -- has a parallel, too.

Obviously, we have been dealing with variety like this for a long time now. It's nothing new. I'm just saying 1995 Upper Deck was the threshold of what I can fully comprehend. If you're stepping into 1995 Upper Deck territory with the choices you have available, whether it's kinds of bread or new car options or toppings for a pizza, then I don't like variety anymore.

Well, it's possible that I still like it. You're just going to have to give me 20 minutes so I can process it.


gcrl said…
the nomo is from the 1995 ud sp set. it's part of a subset (cards 5-24) which were all die cut. in addition to the silver, there is a 'superba foil' parallel. i don't know what that means, but i found two antonio osuna cards from the set in a dime box last weekend that look slightly different.
Ana Lu said…
I'm overwhelmed with so much UD sets! I can picture a never ending list for you to erase numbers of wanted cards ;)
Anonymous said…
I don't know - I find the amount of cards was actually a little bit less confusing back then. It was just starting to get pretty burdensome - that happened around 94/95. Maybe I just remember it better because I was a kid collecting then - but I think today's much more confusing where Topps has 20 products throughout the year and there are 20 versions of the same card (Topps, Topps Chrome, Opening Day, all the parallels in each of those product).
night owl said…
Yes, Topps has more today. I'm saying that '95 Upper Deck was the point when there became so much choice that I couldn't comprehend it all (and it hasn't stopped since). Also, keep in mind in 1995, Topps, Fleer, Donruss, Pacific, Pinnacle, etc., were all doing the same thing, too, which doesn't happen today.
acrackedbat said…
Glad you enjoyed the cards! I'm still going thru boxes of 90s mayhem, so will keep your list at hand. I certainly picked rotten time to discover the hobby. It seems little has changed, other than a Topps monopoly.

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:

1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…


I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…