Skip to main content

'56 of the month: Jim Greengrass


I wish I had time for this blog, but I'm too busy writing for a living right now.

I've really been slacking off on these '56 of the Month posts, too. The last one was in September. I'm down to doing them biannually, which I suppose is better than doing them biennially. (Figure it out, English majors).

So here is a short-and-semisweet chocolate morsel of a post about the Jim Greengrass card I picked up at a show several months ago.

I grabbed it solely because his name is "Greengrass" and he played the outfield. In other words, Greengrass played on green grass.

This is fantastic. As I'm sure I said when I acquired the card, why is this guy not mentioned every day? He should be a legend by now.

I also enjoy how this card shows some giant billboard advertisement. I don't have any time to look up what it might be, but I want it to be an advertisement for Jamaican Steaks because that's what it looks like it reads next to the action shot of Greengrass.

Also, I love the action shot. You never see an action shot like that on a baseball card. And I enjoy that he's playing with no number. I'm assuming it was airbrushed out as Greengrass was dealt from the Reds to the Phillies in the middle of the 1955 season.


Greengrass made an immediate impact for the Reds in 1953, knocking in 100 runs and finishing sixth in the Rookie of the Year voting. He struck for 27 home runs in 1954. After that, things fell apart and he was out of the majors by 1957 due to phlebitis, which is an inflammation of the leg veins. He still deals with it to this day (he's 86 years old).

 Greengrass also hit four doubles in the Reds' season-opener in 1954, which is a record. He shares it with a player named Pop Dillon. (Pop Greengrass would be an awesome name).

 It doesn't say it on the card back, but Greengrass was born in Addison, N.Y., which is near Corning, N.Y., site of the famous glass center, which I probably went to about half a dozen times as a kid. (I think I went to most of those visits willingly, too, which just goes to show you how easily amused we were as children in the 1970s. "Dude blows glass??? What are we waiting for? Start the car!")

 If you want to see several testimonials to Greengrass' pleasantness as a former ballplayer, check out the comments on Baseball By The Letters.

After seeing those, I like this card even more now.

Comments

Hackenbush said…
I like it. I think a lot of us have bought cards because of the player's name.
carlsonjok said…
The Corning Science Center was a common class trip when I was growing up. The only thing I remember is the Van Der Graaf generator.
Great stuff, Mr. Night Owl.

In my case, my brother and I were dragged along to every Newport, R.I. mansion -where invariably we both would both be banished to the car for laughing too hard whenever the tour guide said "Gargoyle." Can you imagine? Sent back to a hot car without adult supervision....that wouldn't fly these days!

Popular posts from this blog

The slash era

I'm not sure how many images of Joe Adell on the 2021 Topps design you have seen already. At the moment of this writing (3:42 p.m.), I've seen it several times, as well as a couple of blog posts about it. I'm sure there are more on the way.

These are what people are saying about it ...

Wait, I suppose I need to show you the image one more time:


There you are.

OK, now, the first reference I saw to it when I woke up out of my nest late this morning is that the design has a border. This was met with applause and I'm right there with them. It's the first Topps bordered flagship set since 2015, although you could make a case for 2019.

There is a lot of tinkering with the border but that just continues the theme of the entire design, which is: IT'S AWFULLY BUSY, AIN'T IT?????

How many design elements are on that card? Ten? Twelve? Fifteen? (Also, purple? There is no purple in the Angels color scheme. Are we going back to the random Topps colors of the '60s, …

The weird things collectors do

It is interesting to me how card collectors seem to have so much in common, as far as interests, personality tendencies, how their brains are wired, etc., and still can be so different.

There are many things that card collectors do that confuse the heck out of me. ... Why? Why would they do that? ... And there are many ways card collectors think that don't match my collecting thought process at all.

I think the influence of the time period in which a collector grew up has a lot to do with the differences. And that's what I'm going to chalk up to the excuse I am now giving to whatever lost soul decided to grade a 1982 Topps Burt Hooton card.

Let's go through the reasons why there's no need to grade a 1982 Topps Burt Hooton:

1. The card came out in 1982.
2. It's Burt Hooton.

I'm done.

But, I'm thinking, somebody grew up in a period when everyone was grading cards and that, yes, even commons should be graded because, you know, they could, uh ... they coul…

Thrill of the chase

An old high school classmate asked me this week how to go about selling some completed Topps baseball sets that she had purchased for her sons each year while they were growing up.

I explained how to search for the sets on eBay by using the completed listings option, but because she is one of my favorite former classmates, to help lessen the shock for her, I searched the sets myself and then gave her an average for each of them, along with an explanation of why they weren't worth much more than what she had paid for them originally.

The sets were from 1997-2008 and with the exception of the 2001 set, which at 790 cards is the largest of the bunch and also contains the Ichiro rookie card, it was clear that nobody values completed sets anymore. At least not non-vintage completed sets.

I already knew this. But seeing it underlined in back-lit numbers stunned me a bit. The 2005 complete set sells for only 40 bucks? I like the 2005 set! I'm trying to complete the 2005 set! Why don…