Skip to main content

3


When I found the Willie Davis card for the anniversary post, it occurred to me that I hadn't featured a "Dodger Numbers" post for awhile. I thought a write-up on the players who have worn No. 3 in Dodger history would be a nice follow-up.

Then I saw how many players that had worn No. 3 over the last 50-plus years. There was no way I was writing that up last night.

I'm in a slightly more perky state today, so I'm willing to go through them all now. But I'll keep the words to a minimum, because there are lots and lots of names here. No. 3 is definitely not a Babe Ruth number for the Dodgers.


During the Brooklyn Dodger days, the main wearers of the No. 3 were Jersey Joe Stripp, a third baseman in the 1930s, Pete Coscarart, starting second baseman in the early '40s, and, most famously, third baseman Billy Cox of the Boys of Summer.


A couple of other players who went on to successful management positions also briefly wore the number during the 1940s. Gene Mauch and Al Campanis.


As the Brooklyn Dodgers became the Los Angeles Dodgers, the No. 3 had moved to the outfield. Elmer Valo, who had worn the number in 1957, kept it in 1958 as a backup corner outfielder.


A promising young star took over the number in 1960. Willie Davis, the Dodgers' center fielder for a dozen years, made the No. 3 so much a part of him that his nickname was "3-Dog." He wore it until he was traded to Montreal for Mike Marshall after the 1973 season.


Glenn Burke, who like Davis grew up in California, took over the number in 1976. Burke is credited -- along with Dusty Baker -- with inventing the "high-five."


I read all about it in the 1981 Dodgers yearbook. It seemed like a strange theme upon which to base a yearbook.

The situation around the origination of the high five varies. The yearbook said it happened during the 1977 NLCS after Baker hit a grand slam against the Phillies. Burke came out of the dugout to congratulate him and since Baker was much taller, he put his hand up and the high five was born.

Other sources say it was after Baker hit a home run against the Astros on the last day of the 1977 season. Burke was the on-deck batter. And still other sources say the first high five didn't even happen in baseball. It happened in basketball.

But back to the No. 3:

In 1978, Burke wore the number until he was dealt to Oakland for Bill North. Then backup shortstop Enzo Hernandez, he of the horrid 1970s batting stats, owned the number briefly.


But by the end of the season, another speedy outfielder, Rudy Law, displayed the No. 3. I had high hopes for Law as a starting center fielder for a long time. But he couldn't stay in the majors while with L.A. After a modest 1980 with the Dodgers and a lost '81 season, he was dealt to the White Sox.


When Law was in the minors in 1979, Derrel Thomas wore No. 3 briefly (he also wore No. 1 briefly, too, before switching to No. 30).

But after Law left for Chicago, the number was handed to someone who would feature the number longer than anyone besides Davis.


Steve Sax, the 1982 Rookie of the Year, featured the No. 3 from '82 through the Dodgers' last championship season in 1988. Through all the highs and lows -- and Sax had a lot of those with L.A. -- I never had to worry about the No. 3 falling into unsavory hands.

I can't say the same for the number since then:


Jeff Hamilton, 1990-91. Lifetime .234 average.


Jody Reed, 1993: A single, unmemorable season for the Dodgers.


After career minor leaguer Eddie Pye acquired the number briefly in 1995, it landed on Chad Fonville, another utility infielder guy. He wore it in 1996 and 1997.


Second baseman Alex Cora, a player so popular with card companies that he was left out of dozens of sets around the turn of the millenium, wore No. 3 from 1998-2001.


Cora moved over to No. 13 in 2002 and his double-play partner, Cesar Izturis, took the No. 3. Izturis was one terrific fielder, and eventually learned to hit --a little bit. He was such a good fielder that I had hopes that he'd stay with the Dodgers for the rest of his career.

Unfortunately, Izturis lasted only through 2006. And get a load of who has worn the No. 3 since then:


Julio Lugo (2006)


Brady Clark (2007)


Delwyn Young (2008)


Xavier Paul (2009)


Ronnie Belliard (2010)

Today, the No. 3 is worn by Eugenio Velez, a former Giant. Velez took over the number after infielder Juan Castro retired after his third or fourth tour with the Dodgers. Castro's No. 3 was the fifth different uniform number he wore with L.A.

With the exception of Davis and Sax, the No. 3 might be destined for mediocrity in a Los Angeles uniform.

Oh well.

At least it invented the high five.


Good night!

Comments

  1. The Three Amigos was such a wonderfully stupid movie. They don't make 'em like that anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hate that card, too.

    I saw Three Amigos in the theater and haven't seen it since, and I had forgotten about that very funny scene. As a youngster when I saw it originally I don't think I really understood the homoerotic undertones.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post, great movie! The Three Amigos is a classically stupid, hilareous movie. The number 3 hasn't been Ruthlike for the Dodgers, but that just means they're due for something better (sooner or later).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh man. I haven't seen that movie in so long. There is no way I could possibly get Wife to watch it with me, so it looks like a Wife-works-this-weekend-movie.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow, you've got a plethora of piñ...er, Dodgers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:


 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …