Skip to main content

Getting stupid over a too common set

 
 
Sometimes I'll read about another collector's devotion to 1990 Donruss or '91 Fleer and my heart will go out to that individual.
 
"That poor collector," I'll say. "They have no idea what's good."
 
But those particular collectors can't help it. They know '91 Donruss is junk -- or at least they should -- but the pull of nostalgia is too strong. The meaning behind that set, what they were doing, who they were, the discoveries and intrigue when that set came out, is now sealed within every card in that set. It's all they can see. It's made them stupid ... for a set ... that, objectively, isn't anything all that great.
 
I know that because I've gotten stupid over too common, too pedestrian sets myself.
 
One of those is 1991-92 Pro Set hockey.
 
The cards from the set are everywhere. The design isn't all that great and, frankly, the set seems to have been put together rather haphazardly. It's also a victim of the expansion that was going on at the time in the NHL.
 
But I see those cards and my mind immediately goes back to that time, when I was first immersing myself into the game and collecting those cards so I could know more. The hobby was exciting at that time and hockey was exciting because it was a world new to me.
 
I've mentioned before that I would like to collect the cards from that set. It doesn't seem like anyone takes me seriously when I say that. After all, I could find a box of 91-92 Pro Set for almost nothing and be done with the thing. Logically, that's what I should do. And, someday probably, that's what I will do.
 
But for now, I'm being stupid. I'm collecting the cards, bit by bit, when the mood strikes. When nostalgia strikes.
 
And, finally, someone has aided my habit. He is an accomplice to my stupid nostalgic urges. Good ol' buckstorecards has sent me one of his annual packages of sports cards goodness.


I knew I could count on him.

That is 143 cards from the 615-card Pro Set ... uh ... set (once again, Pro Set name, I hate you). Actually, a little bit less as I'll show in a minute.


I love the '91-92 set because it recalls a time when I knew every star who skated on NHL ice. All of these guys are very familiar to me, and now that I pay little attention to the NHL, part of me believes they're still actually playing.


Look at all those guys we used to talk about every day. Don't you remember reading about them in the newspaper and catching them on Hockey Night in Canada? I do. And it was my first appreciation of what greatness on a sheet of ice meant.
 
 





Some superstars for ya.
 


This is how long ago this set came out. Guys were still out there acting like helmets were a bad idea.
 


Another "you're so old" reminder. Ric Nattress' son played for a team that my newspaper covers last year. And the son wasn't a young guy either. He was in "you're probably too old to be playing hockey" territory.

Sheesh.
 


This is what will really take you back to the time period. Brand new San Jose Sharks!

Remember when the Sharks were the IT team and teal was the IT color? I had a Sharks hat during this time. It was atrocious. Just crime-worthy ugly. 1990s fashion was so brutal.
 


Pro Set has a lot of fun subsets, all-stars and history of the game stuff, and it's filled with crazy things like players having more than one card but with different teams. And then there's the above: two players with the same team with the same uniform on consecutively numbered cards but with different logos.

The reason the logos are different is because the card on the right is the French Canadian version, which had the updated Stars logo.


Oh, did I not mention that Doug sent both the American and French versions of the cards? That's why I didn't get 143 cards of one set. It's 143 cards of the American and French sets combined.

Honestly, how many things was Pro Set throwing at you at once?

Doug's not one to stop at just one kind of card thing in his mailings, so, of course, there were the usual random assemblage of Sabres hockey cards, too.




I honestly have little idea of what I have for Sabres cards as I sort through them maybe twice a year. I have even less of an idea of what all the sets are, which is probably why I sort through them twice a year. But they sure are fun to look at all together!


There are always Bills cards, too, as Doug and I are both Bills fans.
 


The top row is fancy.
 




I never quite know what to do with college cards of future Bills, I have so little use for college football. But it's nice to see where they came from, I guess.
 


The most exciting part of the package though -- aside from those Pro Set cards -- were a bunch of present-day Panini Chronicles Dodgers.

This is something that I never see -- especially now during the days of store shelf raiding.








All of the various sets within the set are an attempt, I'm convinced, to take your mind off the fact that there's not an MLB logo to be found, but it's still a lot of fun. The Magnitude cards are almost genius -- my goodness, Panini, what's come over you? -- and the Titanium cards show the '90s that you can actually make cards shiny and get them to scan properly.
 


Doug even threw in a couple of hits, one of the former Dodger and tattoo addict, Alex Verdugo.
 
 

And then there's this.

This card is both impressive and bizarre.

First of all, it's an impressive send by Doug. Gavin Lux cards were super-hot at the start of the baseball season. They've dipped since then, but my first Lux autograph is quite appreciated.

The look of the card is rather odd. Not the greatest choice of photo and Lux, like all modern major leaguers, needs to work on his signature.

But that's why they make all kinds of collectors. Some get stupid for pervasive Pro Set hockey cards from 30 years ago and some get stupid over the latest nonlicensed cards.

One more card from Doug and then I'll depart.


It's one of those elusive Opening Day variation cards that I never see because I'm not buying cases of Opening Day.
 
The beauty of this hobby is there will always be a set or a card that you can get stupid over. Whether that's nostalgia or just the attraction to the new and shiny, cards never lose their appeal.
 
I'm just glad I've never found 1990 Donruss or 1991 Fleer appealing.

Comments

carlsonjok said…
Those San Jose cards taken in a dark studio immediately reminded me of the Kansas City Scout and Washington Capital cards in the 1974-75 Loblaws set. Fun fact: Jim Shoenfeld was in both the Loblaws set and your 1991-92 Pro Set.
bryan was here said…
Wow, I remember 91-92 Pro Set Hockey like it was yesterday. Rather funny now, but back then as a college student with a $8/hr job, a new pickup truck payment, and books to buy for classes that semester, what did I spend my money on? That's right, two boxes of Pro Set Hockey. Priorities.

I believe I have at least one near-complete set somewhere in my mum's attic. I'll have to check in the spring.
gregory said…
Man, I remember a 1991-92 Pro Set hockey card appearing on the front of more than one Beckett price guide back then, accompanied by articles within the magazine explaining how hot (HOT!!) the cards were. Funny to look back on that now.

Thanks for the dose of nostalgia. And if you ever consider collecting the 1991-92 OPC hockey set, I've got a couple hundred cards for you.
JediJeff said…
What the hell is the May Magnitude card? Looks like a picture of some MLB HeroClix.
John Bateman said…
I collected 90-91 Pro Set Hockey but not the 91-92 set. After looking at those cards, they look great. I know Pro Set had a funky kind of card stock I did not like but that Hextall photo is awesome. Also the Classics Bellinger reminds me 1988 Topps a little bit.
Fuji said…
I like 1991 Fleer. I like 1991-92 Pro Set hockey (although I like 1990-91 Pro Set hockey more). And I like the San Jose Sharks. I guess me not so smart. :D

Popular posts from this blog

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 90-81

  I've been watching the Netflix documentary series on the doomed Challenger mission, whose anniversary is 35 years ago this month. Depressing viewing, I know. I was a college student at the time and heard the horrible news as I was driving to the bank to cash a paycheck after classes. I can't imagine what it was like for all those school classrooms that had tuned in to watch the broadcast that day. The documentary is quite well done, so far. The footage is incredible. Not just from all the space shuttle technology video and the awesome lift-off camera work but the depth of it. Every astronaut's every move from student eight years prior to the fateful day seems to have been cataloged. Also the background music is spot-on as far as time period (always a big thing with me) and takes me right back to those days. As always, it's difficult to believe that Jan. 28, 1986 was that long ago. I can still feel 1986 in my heart and that year still seems like it was on the cutting e

G.O.A.T, the '80s: 80-71

  The longer you've been alive on this planet the more perspective you have on what "a long time ago" means.   A person I know is a Tampa Bay Buccaneers fan. He's pretty young. He says he's waited a long time for the Bucs to appear in the playoffs. It's been agony, you see, waiting all the way since ... 2007! ... to see his team in the postseason. How has he managed? As a Bills fan, I know waiting. Buffalo spent 17 straight years out of the playoffs, a longer wait than any other team. The last time Buffalo made the AFC championship game, where they are now, was 1994. That was the month of the Northridge earthquake in Los Angeles. That was the month I moved to the town where I live now. That was the month of 20-below temperatures for a week straight. That was a long time ago! A fellow co-worker said prior to Sunday that a Bills-Browns title game would sum up the 2020 NFL season, implying that these teams never make the postseason. But again, this is another ca

Saving vs. waiting

  Hello, it's contrarian night owl here, telling another tale about how obsessed we are with saving our cash.   I can tell you're shocked already.   Saving is a good thing, right? It's the American way. Getting the cheapest possible deal on whatever you're interested in purchasing gets you a little gold star or check mark somewhere, correct? Actually, I don't think that's the way it works. Which is why I haven't been much for trying to find the cheapest way to buy cards. I've addressed this before . I see the point if you're on a strict budget or your job status is shaky or you're paying tuition for three kids in college. But saving for saving's sake I just don't get. Sure, I get excited when I find a deal on ebay. And I pat myself on the back when I discover a shirt I bought that I like was on clearance. But it's never the point of the sale for me. The point is: did I get what I want? Recently, I think I found another point, when it