Skip to main content

More to the story


The best version of the record breakers/highlights subsets that Topps churned out each year during the 1970s and 1980s is -- without a doubt -- the 1976 Topps record breakers.

Part of the reason I feel this way is because it's the first time I realized what Topps was doing with this subset. When I collected the '75 set, I consider the Kaline and Ryan "highlights" as just another card. But no, in 1976, I knew: Topps was recounting great feats from the past season!

But the other reason the '76 record breaker set is the greatest has nothing to do with me -- it has to do with the backs of the cards.

Yes, I said the backs of the cards.

I'm going to make you look at the backs.

No whining. Your life isn't that difficult. You can read a card back.

The backs are unlike any other Record Breaker or Highlights subset ever issued by Topps. And that's because Topps used numbers to support its words. Real, live, interesting statistics.

I'll show you, card by card.


Card #1 - Hank Aaron

Reason for the card: Hank Aaron set a record for the most career runs batted in.

The back:


Along with a blurb of Aaron's record-breaking achievement, Topps lists the all-time RBI record-holders to that point. All of those 1976 card-collecting fans were now smarter for knowing that Harry Heilmann was 18th all-time in runs batted in.



Card #2 - Bobby Bonds

Reason for the card: Bobby Bonds set a record for most lead-off home runs in a career and a record for the most 30-30 seasons.

The back:


Topps lists both the most lead-off home runs in a career (I'd love to see a current version of this list) and all of the times up 'til then that a player hit 30 home runs and stole 30 bases in a season. That's going the extra mile right there and certainly appreciated, even in this baseball-reference era.



Card #3 - Mickey Lolich

Reason for the card: Mickey Lolich broke the record for career strikeouts by a left-handed pitcher.

The back:


There is the blurb and then a list of all the top lefty flame-throwers in MLB history at the time. Even though this list is totally different than the current list, it's still fascinating to read.



Card #4 - Dave Lopes

Reason for the card: Dave Lopes set a record for the most consecutive stolen bases.

The back:


I loved this card back as a kid. Look at that research! No internet to lean on here. I'm not sure how Topps tracked this down: The Sporting News? Newspapers? The Dodgers? But it's great. For every stolen base you know the date, the opponent, the pitcher, the inning and the base!

Glorious.



Card #5 - Tom Seaver

Reason for the card: Tom Seaver set the mark for most 200-plus strikeout seasons in a row.

The back:


While this card gets a lot of attention for the weirdly airbrushed helmet on the batter in the photo, I'll focus on the back, which gives a rundown of the most consecutive seasons with 200-plus strikeouts. I'm sure this was new information for a lot of people.



Card #6 - Rennie Stennett

Reason for the card: Rennie Stennett went 7-for-7 in a nine-inning game.

The back:


This was fascinating to me when I pulled this card.

I remember reading about Stennett's amazing performance and the Pirates' 22-0 victory in the paper. To get a rundown of Stennett's seven hits, inning-by-inning WITH his result was very satisfying.


This record breaker set must have been a significant amount of work for Topps because no other record breaker or highlight subset issued before or since would include this kind of statistical information. Every other record breaker card features a simple write-up on the back and that is it.

That is why this is the best record-breaker set.

And, why, it underlines the poor excuse for some Topps' card backs today, especially those online cards.

Comments

I didn't know Bob Veale was a lefty. (Ya learn something new every day!)
Base Card Hero said…
These are great. I wish Topps still took the time to put this stuff on the backs are cards. It's all irrelevant now. The backs of All-Star cards used to give fun information too. Not anymore.
Old Cards said…
I like reading card backs. Isn't that what separates collectors, like all of us,from investors?
I check out every centimeter of a baseball card. Trying to find any reason to keep a dupe.
Mike said…
Very fun recap, particularly given that the 1976 set is one of which I had only previously seen the front of stray cards.

The Bobby Bonds card immediately made me think of the Season Highlights card from when Rickey Henderson broke the leadoff HR in the 1989 season. While the back did its best to emulate a newspaper report of breaking baseball news, it certainly pales in comparison to what was offered on Bonds' card.

https://www.comc.com/Cards/Baseball/1990/Topps_-_Base/7/Rickey_Henderson/1962987
Brett Alan said…
It’s certainly a big thing for me. I love going through my latest card show haul and reading everything there is to read on them.

These are great backs indeed.
I never realized they made a Lopes card for his consecutive stolen base record. I remember it getting broken by Vince Coleman at some point in the late 1980s, which was controversial because his streak was over two seasons. I agree these cards have great backs.
BaseSetCalling said…
These cards awed me as a kid as well. As a Pirate fan then, the Stennett card was a treasured possession. It also seemed to me that Seaver struck people out by simply staring them down into submission.

One of my favorite pulls from the Topps re-insertion program of a few years ago now was a stamped copy of the Lopes card. Was so nice to see it appear in a pack of baseball cards again.

Some new card backs are better than others. I quite look forward to reading all of the backs in 2019 Archives, for example.

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:



1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…

Eighties

I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…