Skip to main content

Laundry list

I entered one of Sports Card Info's many card contests a couple of weeks ago.

Andrew's been holding these giveaways for probably as long as I've been blogging, but I rarely enter. Plus, it's one of those deals where if you comment on the post every day, you have a better chance of winning, and I never remember to comment more than once.

My forgetfulness didn't matter this time though and I won the above Alex Verdugo "player-worn memorabilia" card!

My enthusiasm aside, I think we're all past relic cards these days. The peak era for relics probably ended almost 10 years ago, and ever since we've been accumulating them absent-mindedly, knowing that they're probably not legitimate, a victim of our habits and nostalgia and ... I don't know, a difficult-to-shake fondness for laundry bits, I guess.

I never go out of my way to obtain a relic card. Even when they were "the shit," as the kids-who-are-now-adults say, they were never a priority.

But it's always been an unspoken goal for me to obtain at least one relic card -- whether it's laundry or a wood shard -- of every Dodger player available.

This is a very arbitrary exercise because you're at the whim of the card company's methods -- who they think will sell in relic form and who they are able to obtain in relic form. It's not like collecting autographs where you could conceivably get a signed card of every Dodger player, whether the card company has anything to do with it or not, because all you need to do is have the player sign a piece of cardboard at some point in time.

For example, let's take two distinct periods of recent Dodger history.

One is the time when I rooted for the Dodgers as a kid. I have relics for most of the main players from that time. The laundry of Steve Garvey, Ron Cey, Davey Lopes, Bill Russell, Dusty Baker, Reggie Smith, Don Sutton and Burt Hooton all resides in my collection.

There are also relic cards available for others from that time: Tommy John and Steve Yeager, most notably.

But because these players' careers landed outside of The Relic Era, other notables from that time do not have relic cards, at least none that I can find. Doug Rau, Rick Rhoden and Joe Ferguson were all starters and contributors to those playoff teams but try to find laundry of them. Same with Andy Messersmith or Willie Crawford or Lee Lacy.

Yeah, laugh at Lee Lacy. But there's a relic card of Mike Kinkade sitting in my collection. I defy anyone to recall a Dodger memory of Mike Kinkade. But because he played during The Relic Era, he has a relic card.

Now let's go to the current Dodger period.

I have very few relics for current Dodgers. The list includes Clayton Kershaw, Russell Martin, Corey Seager, Joc Pederson, Chris Taylor, Kenley Jansen and now Alex Verdugo.

One of the reasons for this is the Dodgers are relatively young with lots of players barely established in the card world, such as Will Smith, Matt Beaty and Gavin Lux. Another reason is Cody Bellinger hoarding. There are relics of Bellinger out there but a number of them are too pricey, which is ridiculous for clothing bits.

But why don't I have relics for Justin Turner or Max Muncy or Hyun-Jin Ryu or Walker Buehler?

Lack of enthusiasm is one reason. The Relic Era is over, you know. But also, the enthusiasm for creating relics has lessened, too. Most relics of the guys I just mentioned are either Panini cards (yawn) or All-Star jerseys (ugh).

This is why my Dodger relic collection will never be truly representative of "every player " to play for the Dodgers. Topps can't even produce a relic card of Steve Sax or Kiké Hernandez before we even get to forgotten players like John Hale or Ralph Bryant.

But that examination aside, let's look at a laundry list (with some wood bats thrown in) of all of the Dodgers for which I have relic cards for, with Alex Verdugo now added to the list:

Dusty Baker
Hank Behrman
Adrian Beltre
Angel Berroa

Chad Billingsley
Yhency Brazoban
Kevin Brown
Jonathan Broxton

Roy Campanella
Ron Cey
Chin-Feng Chen
Carl Crawford
Ivan DeJesus Jr.
Blake DeWitt
J.D. Drew

Don Drysdale
Andre Ethier
Kyle Farmer
Rafael Furcal
Eric Gagne
Steve Garvey
Kirk Gibson
Adrian Gonzalez
Luis Gonzalez
Dee Gordon
Shawn Green
Marquis Grissom
Pedro Guerrero
Joel Guzman
Orel Hershiser
Burt Hooton
Chin-Lung Hu
Todd Hundley
Kaz Ishii
Cesar Izturis
Edwin Jackson

Kenley Jansen
Charles Johnson
Spider Jorgensen
Andruw Jones
Eric Karros

Matt Kemp
Jeff Kent
Clayton Kershaw
Mike Kinkade
Hong-Chih Kuo
Hiroki Kuroda

Tommy Lasorda
Paul LoDuca
James Loney
Davey Lopes
Russell Martin
Eddie Murray

Hideo Nomo
Al Oliver
Chan Ho Park
Wes Parker
Joc Pederson
Brad Penny
Juan Pierre
Yasiel Puig
Hanley Ramirez

Manny Ramirez
Pee Wee Reese
Jackie Robinson
Paco Rodriguez
Ricardo Rodriguez
Bill Russell
Takashi Saito
Corey Seager
Gary Sheffield
Reggie Smith

Duke Snider
Don Sutton
Chris Taylor
Fernando Valenzuela
Alex Verdugo
Maury Wills
Delwyn Young

Verdugo was officially the 80th Dodgers for whom I have a relic card.

Obvious holes in this collection are some of the players I mentioned above, as well as 1960s standouts like Willie Davis and, of course, Sandy Koufax.

But the list seems finite and if I ever put my mind to it, I could probably track down one of every available Dodger player with limited trouble.

If I was able to do that, I could probably dismiss many of my "repeat relics" -- the 15 Shawn Green relics and the, my god why do I have five J.D. Drew relics???

But I'm probably never going to commit to it. I'll just gather them as I may, never thinking too much about them. In fact, maybe if I hit 100 Dodgers, I'll stop, because space is always at a premium.

And we all know all those relics are just some Topps executive's socks.


  1. I could care less if the "relic" is actually game used. It's just another insert to me. As long as the card looks good to me, I can dig it.

    I call the white relics "paper towels", because they have the same look and feel.

  2. Although The Relic Era has come and gone... I still find myself enjoying them and seeking them out when I hit up card shows and flea markets. The only major difference is I'm not willing to shell out more than a few bucks for anyone except hard to find hall of famers (like Jackie Robinson and Roy Campanella). 80 different Dodgers is pretty darn impressive. I bet I only have 25 to 35 different A's laying around.

  3. I agree with the sentiment that they are just another insert card at this point. Most collectors know they are not game used, but there are still a few relic cards out there from over the years with really great designs, or they were fun to collect at the time they were released. I am curious about how many unique Durham Bulls and Cardinals players I have in relic form. 80 is a lot.

  4. I still enjoy purchasing Red Sox and Cubs relics, mostly because of how cheap they are now that the autograph is all the rage. I'll even purchase relics of teams that I don't collect because of the low price point. Willie McCovey relics for $2 each? Say no more.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Addressing the elephant in the room

A few people have noticed: I changed the way the blog looked with zero fanfare earlier this week.

I've changed my blog appearance, I think, six times now, although one was just a header swap. Just about all of those came with a bit of a warning or explanation.

I didn't think that was necessary this time, mostly because I've been doing this for over a decade, am pretty established, and don't think I need to justify my decisions here.

But also I thought that people were familiar with the general changes in web sites over the last two, three, four years and wouldn't be that affected by it. For the most part that seems to be true -- or, no one cares and they're all looking at pretty instagram pictures.

I've received a couple of questions though and just because I hate the feeling that some readers are lost, I'll explain what I can.

The changes, like many web site changes, are related to mobile phone use.

I've been irked by the way my blog looks on my p…

Mind explosion: a different way to sort

This may have been one of the most tedious blog posts to put together in the history of this blog, but I think it's for a good cause.

The reason I'm not entirely sure is because I didn't have time to carry it out for a few more attempts, got to shovel that 7 inches of heavy wet snow plopped on my estate on Nov. 12th.

Anyway, a couple of days ago, Colbey from Cardboard Collections was sorting his Topps Holiday set by card number and asked a very common question that I've seen come up many times during my blogging career:

 This is always a satisfying question because this is how I organize my sets when I'm organizing by card number. At the top of the post I showed cards from the 2019 Topps flagship set being sorted in that manner -- stacks separated by hundreds first, then you create separate stacks by 10s within each hundreds stack, then finally order each of the 10s by card number.

I've done this since I was a kid and first knew the card numbers on the back me…

Looking at cards with Johnny B.

Over the weekend, I got a chance to express my inner Mike Oz and share some baseball cards with a former major league player.

I'm working on a story for my paper that involves ex-player Johnny Wockenfuss, who is almost a cult figure with fans of a certain age (I am one) and especially fans of the Detroit Tigers during the '70s and '80s.

I won't go into much detail -- at least not now -- because I'm still in the middle of working on it, have more gathering to go, and I get very protective of my stories while I'm in the middle of the process. Got to retain that exclusive, you know.

But I will say that I was able to sit in the home of Wockenfuss, give him the cards that I have of him in my collection, and ask his opinion on them.

Yeah, cool. Way cool.

I have 17 cards of Wockenfuss ("you have a lot of them," my wife said, and I thought "if that's a lot, what is my Hideo Nomo collection?"). Wockenfuss remembered the cards -- "every bit …