Skip to main content

Yello


I have a love-hate relationship with the use of yellow on baseball cards.

I realize that it is necessary. There's nothing brighter than yellow, so when you want to alert a card collector -- HEY! BUY THIS CARD! -- yellow helps. Oh, Yeah, it sure does help.

But there are other times, some very obvious glaring times -- you know how much glare yellow creates -- when it's too much. There were other colors that could have been selected, other choices that would be a little less offensive, or at least something that could be turned down a notch. (FYI: I wrote about yellow on cards a couple years ago, mentioning some of these same ideas and even doing a countdown. You run out of ideas after 10 plus years).

I find yellow not all that attractive given the choices. So when the 1959 Topps set selected yellow for many of the Dodgers cards ...


... yeah, it bothered me. There are so many fun colors in the 1959 set. Seafoam green and pink-house pink and sky blue and orangey orange and jet black. I don't really find anything fun in a yellow border.

So aggravating. That's how I find yellow. The year before, Topps had the audacity to put every last Dodger player in a yellow border.


Don't go looking for another color for the Dodgers this year. You won't find any. Besides you'll be blinded by a single view of the team set. (Other teams are similarly afflicted, but they do get one or two colors mixed in with all that yellow).

That's how it goes with yellow and cards for me, and I haven't even reached the biggest laughingstock in yellow ever created.


1991 Fleer created an entire set robed in yellow. No other color. Just yellow. I'll admit, it accomplished the buzz it sought. Collectors still talk about this set, mostly in derisive tones, which then causes a few misguided souls to profess their undying love for a set colored with a few thousand egg yolks.

(I am just noticing that the '91 Fleer design scheme is very similar to the Yello 45 sleeve at the top of the post and now I am quite conflicted).

Yet, there are times when yellow simply works on cards.


Yellow is a time-honored tradition for food-issue cards, which makes sense as yellow is a traditional color used in restaurant advertising (particularly fast-food) and food packaging. None of the above designs bother me in the slightest because I expect it. I expect no logos and the brightest possible design treatment.

I've even enjoyed yellow in Topps flagship issues, discounting those late '50s examples.


For example, I adore the yellow-bordered cards in the 1972 Topps set, most especially the Astros cards. This Cesar Cedeno card was featured in my blog header several years ago just because I've enjoyed it ever since I was a kid. The yellow backdrop works perfectly with the blue-and-orange of the team name and the Astros' uniform colors from that time bring the entire card together.



Would the 1975 Topps all-star cards (my favorite all-star cards) have the same impact if the top half of the border wasn't yellow? I think not.

As much as this now makes me envision the greatness of a blue-red '75 All-Star card, nothing ANNOUNCES a presence like yellow. And that's what you need with an all-star card.

So that little history lesson brings me to what caused me to write all this (again):


A few weeks ago, the Twitter world went into a frenzy (shocker, I know) about yellow parallels discovered in Topps Series 1 packs found at Walgreen's.

Everywhere, it seemed, collectors were scoping out area Walgreen's and announcing whether they found the yellow parallels or not. Some scolded their Walgreen's for failing to stock Topps Series 1. Meanwhile I thought I was fortunate that my Walgreen's regularly stocked repack boxes. I didn't even know Walgreen's stocked current Topps cards.

So I didn't find any yellow parallels myself. The above card was sent to me by Matt from The Summer of '74 blog (and more frequently, of Twitter).

It's ... weird.

It reminds me of -- and I'm going to go very old-school here -- the View Master projectors and reels. There was a feature (I think it was View Master anyway) where you could filter the image you saw by a color, red, blue, etc. That's what this looks like, the image viewed through a yellow filter.

It's pretty pointless. I don't mind pointless, if it looks nice or cool. This looks like, eh. Which is fitting, because "eh" describes any visit to Walgreen's.

A few years ago I'd be in a panic because this would be another parallel I would have to chase for all of the Dodgers and where am I going to find those? But I don't bother with that stuff anymore.

Instead, I gladly accept the cards that people send me. Matt added a few other needs with the yellow-themed Jansen.


A non-licensed version -- and how about this filter? -- of your starting NL All-Star outfielder.



The best of the Dodgers' 47 catching prospects.


I am a winner ... of one of the last '92 Winner Dodgers that I still needed (It may be the last one, I have so many other completion tasks to track before this one).



A couple of Bowman Chrome "needs" of a former Dodger prospect and one that is still working his way through the L.A. ranks.



Here's a bit of embarrassment. Matt threw a few Piazza cards at me in an image and allowed me to select which ones I needed. I picked these two.

But because my eyes repeatedly fail me and I am not familiar with cards from 2000, I wasn't aware that the cards at the left was Piazza as a Met and what the hell am I going to do with that? (Well, I know what to do with it -- trade it).

But it's nice to get that '93 Leaf one finally.


Matt also found a few early '80s Fleer needs for my collection. Look at how chill players were in 1983. Don't you wish they were that relaxed on your cards now? I know I do.



Advancing into the past one more year. There's big boy Al Holland.



And this thing. I love it and cringe at the same time. It's obviously at Dodger Stadium. You can barely see Dickie Thon's face. It looks like a card that is 37 years old. Isn't it great?

Fleer used a lot of yellow in its early sets, too, especially the 1981 "debut," which was nothing but yellow. I wasn't all that crazy about it back in '81 and I know it was because of the yellow. It's quite the polarizing color.

Because there was one more of those yellow parallels that Matt sent that I like quite a bit.


Oh, yeah.

Comments

  1. "A couple of Bowman Chrome "needs" of a former Dodger prospect and one that is still working his way through the L.A. ranks."

    Actually both Yadier Alvarez and Mitchell White are both still Dodgers prospects. I think you might've mixed up Yadier with outfielder Yordan Alvarez who the Dodgers traded away for *checks notes* something called a Josh Fields.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I need to stop commenting entirely on minor league prospects. It's obvious I have no idea what I'm talking about.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I checked the Walgreens near me and only saw repacks - a couple baseball and a few football. No 2019 Topps hanger boxes. These yellow parallels got me all excited that a store down the street from me would have current year cards in stock. I dont even know why i was chasing them in the first place-I'm not a fan of yellow, or the 2019 design.

      Next time I'll just battle the traffic and go to Target if I'm that desperate for new cards :/

      Delete
  3. I think Yellow is a color that works best in combination with other colors and not on its own. Hence it makes the 1991 Fleer set look as bad as the 1991 Fleer set (I guess that is where that phrase comes from), but it goes well on the 1972 and 1975 Topps sets because it has other colors to work with.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yellow doesn't both me. Chrome cards however, annoy the hell out of me (no matter what the color of parallel). I like shiny sometimes, but chromium cards not my thang.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The 1960 Topps Dodgers also have a lot yellow. Even Duke Snider's card has a yellow base. Also, plenty of yellow on the 1961 Dodgers with Snider's name in a yellow box and Drysdale and Koufax with yellow team name boxes. The 1963 Dodgers have only 2 players with yellow bases - Walt Alston and Joe Moeller (who?), but the predominant background color on the Dodger team card is (you guessed it), yellow. Hey! This is fun! One more. The 2018 Throwback Thursday card, in a 1963 design, of, not Ferris Bueller,but Walker Buehler has a yellow base!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I dig the yellow. It's my second favorite color, after green. It didn't used to be, but it is now. I probably said the exact same thing on your last post about the topic.

    ReplyDelete
  7. We have tons of Walgreens, but they also usually just have a sad football or baseball repack box or two per store. Sometimes both at once.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't see why your choice of the Piazza cards was an embarrassment. You obviously have good taste to have picked out the Mets card that you did. :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. The pictures on the Walgreens cards look like they've been dipped in yellow jello.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The first thing I think of is that the dog had to wait too long to go outside. But I don't want to be gross.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 5 years ago, I couldn't stand 1991 Fleer. But I've grown to appreciate it for some of the photography.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Now I have a sudden urge to listen to Coldplay.... just kidding. Though I do like their song Yellow much more than I liked the 1991 Fleer cards.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Can't get past this connection between yellow and the Dodgers. If you look at the Dodgers' starting lineup in 1960, every starter for that particular year, including Don Drysdale, the leading Dodger pitcher in 1960, has a yellow base, with one exception - the catcher, John Roseboro. Maury Wills was the starting shortstop, but there is no card for him in 1960. You can insert backup shortstop, Bob Aspromonte or the previous year's starter, Don Zimmer and continue the yellow base theme. You can also fix the catcher by inserting backup catcher, Norm Sherry with his yellow based card.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Giving thanks for bloggers

This is my address book with the addresses of people who have traded cards with me through the mail.

I bought it maybe three months into my blogging career when I realized that you didn't just blog about cards but you actually blogged about cards that people sent you, too.

It's definitely an old-school way to file addresses. But then this is an old-school hobby and I'm still a guy who thinks if I put critical information on the computer without a physical backup, I'm going to lose everything. I never got around to getting the addresses on some sort of word document so the address book has all kinds of updates and cross-outs and ... well, it's a disaster, basically. You people move, a LOT.

However, I consider this book a tribute, a tribute to everyone who has ever sent me cards. And although not everyone in this book has a blog (or had a blog), it is also a tribute to blogging and trading through the blogs.

Lately I've seen people gravitate toward Trading Card …

Simba ... and the most Hall of Famers, update 10

One of my childhood favorites was voted into the Baseball Hall of Fame yesterday.

I haven't been a fan of the Cardinals for decades, but there was a period during the '70s and early '80s when I rooted for them quietly. Some of my favorite cards were Cardinals, players like Lou Brock, Keith Hernandez, Bake McBride, Al Hrabosky and ... Ted Simmons.

From the moment I saw his 1975 Topps "Dude Looks Like a Lady" card, owned by the cool kid up the street, something spoke to me about this Simmons character. His cards were pretty awesome and, looking at his stats on the back -- whoa! -- he was GOOD.

From there I thought Simmons never received the attention he should have gotten. Overshadowed by Johnny Bench in the National League, and by Fisk and Munson in the American League, Simmons hit the stuffing out of pitchers, all while balancing it with being the Cardinals' primary catcher.

Simmons, along with Bench and Fisk and Manny Sanguillen and others, was part of a &#…

New blog, new trade partner, can't beat that

If you can create an established blog with a little bit of readership, certain perks come along with that.

One is a few trade partners that are somewhat exclusive to your own well-read blog. I have a handful of them that trade with just my blog, basically, and I am quite grateful for that. I consider it a reward for trying to get some content out there.

I've noticed that I'm not the only card blog with that perk. There are a few others who enjoy exclusive relationships with traders.

I've seen on Dime Boxes that there's this guy named Bob who sends Nick cards from time-to-time. My question when I read these posts is usually, "Hey I like cards and have a blog, too. Where are my cards?"

Well, Bob must have heard my thoughts because a week or so ago I received an email from him offering to send me some cards.

Bob's also started a card blog, called the best bubble. You can't beat that! Cards from a new trader and a new blog to read! My goodness, this blog…