Skip to main content

Playing for both teams


I am not inferring anything about these two gentlemen. This is merely a blog title to get to a point.

The February edition of Beckett Vintage magazine is now available everywhere and anyone who wants to read the article I wrote for it has probably done so or has pretended to do so. I've been charmed by the people I know who have absolutely zero interest in baseball cards who have read the entire piece and have supposedly enjoyed it. It's nice of them to say so.

I am just getting going on another story for Beckett Vintage. I know my story topic and I have the deadline date. So this may be a regular thing, guys, and that's pretty awesome and also pretty weird.

You see, in some ways I have been an adversary of Beckett and publications like it. I am the enemy of the very industry that I enjoy and adore so much, the magazine industry.

I enjoyed magazines so much growing up and wanted to write for them so much that when blogs came along, I was instantly attracted to them, but I didn't realize what they were. They were online magazines. And baseball card blogs were online versions of baseball cards magazines. It took me awhile to recognize that.

Even after I did realize that, it's not anything I thought about much. I just kept on writing.

But recently, blog reader Dave, who has sent me many, many awesome card packages over the years, sent a package with a note that made me think. It said:

"Seven years ago, I did not renew my subscription to Beckett as I found reading baseball card blogs -- such as yours -- more informative and enjoyable. Now you're writing for Beckett!"

Huh.

I think that's what's known as "playing for both teams" -- the nonsexual definition of the phrase anyway.

That made me feel a little weird. I've probably contributed to Beckett losing subscribers and now I'm writing for one of their magazines. That is ... interesting.

If I want to keep going on doing what I'm doing -- writing regularly for this blog and contributing articles for Beckett -- then I'll leave it at that and not think about it anymore. I know a good thing when I see it, and writing about cards in whatever form is a great thing. So instead of thinking about all kinds of uncomfortable thoughts, let's see the cards that Dave sent!


He had let me know that a package was coming a little bit ago because he said he had a couple of 1982 Fleer needs off my list. They are Pirates, of course, because Dave is a Pirates fan.

But he didn't stop there because that is totally unlike him.


Here is a Fleer Pirate need from the very next year.



Here is a 1985 Fleer need of a player who played the Pirates in the 1979 World Series.



Here is a card from 2018 with an awkward title of a very a 1960s pitcher that I collect.



Here is a card of Koufax's former teammate, Don, and Don's wife, the great basketball Olympian, Ann Meyers, on a 2018 card set issued by Sage and based on the old Goudey Sport Kings cards. They're pretty nifty and mini-sized.


Here is a full-sized Sage Sport King of a predecessor of Drysdale. I didn't know Sage could do such quality work.


Here is yet another design from Adrian Beltre's 1998 Topps Tek card. I have a couple of other versions. I don't even want to know what all the other ones are because someone is going to say there are 4,796 other versions and I'll never say anything nice about '90s cards again.


Here is a 1994 Mother's Cookies Mike Piazza set all nicely wrapped and marked down for me.


Here are the four cards in the set. I have owned the top two cards for quite awhile. But the bottom two are new and I am so happy the set is complete.


Here is one absolutely awesome 1977 Topps football need. You never hear about Cliff Branch anymore. Back when I was first watching football, you heard about Cliff Branch ALL THE TIME. If you had a card of Cliff Branch, you had something special and you knew it. Look at that thing. That's practically a perfect trading card.


Here are four heroes of my sister-in-law's from when she was a teenager. She knew all these guys. Loved Jerry Korab. My sister began to follow these guys, too, although she was too young to really know anything more than her sister thought they were cute.

Oh, by the way, they're not Topps 74-75. They're OPC 74-75.



Here are four 1970 Topps needs that are in brilliant shape. Rico Carty was an absolute bat wizard at this exact point in time, hitting .342 the previous year. The stats on the back list his reason for playing in 1968 as "illness". I guess writing "TUBERCULOSIS -- DID NOT PLAY" might freak out the kids.



Here are six fantastic-looking 1965 Topps cards that were actually joined by a seventh -- that rookies stars card up top of secret lovers Pete and Dick (dammit, I said I wouldn't do that joke!). I have no plans to try to collect the 1965 set, but it's always nice to have 50-plus-year-old vintage in the house to impress guests.



Here is the last card in the 1956 Topps set that I happened to have received a few weeks ago, meaning I have duplicates of the last card in the 1956 Topps set and I think that's the sign that you've been collecting too long and you need to start doing something else because obviously you've perfected this hobby.



And here is ... well ... please tell me what this is.

It LOOKS like a 1922 E120 American Caramel card of former Brooklyn player Dutch Reuther. But that can't be it, can it?

Half of me feels that this is a reprint. I recently received some other reprints from this set, but those cards feature a general light green tint, on the border and on the back and look like reprints of the set listed online.

This card, however, looks like the actual E120 American Caramel cards, front and back.


That's the back, which obviously had been glued to something at some point. The paper has torn away on the top and the bottom, and the bottom is unfortunate because that's where it often says "Reprint" if it is a reprint.

Instead, the back looks like a bloody actual 1922 E120 American Caramel card!

But I have no idea. I have never seen one with my own hands. I don't know what they're supposed to feel like. Are they flimsy (this one is)? Are they thick? Are the corners sharp or rounded? Who do I ask about this stuff?

I could wonder about this for the next 20 minutes, but I need something to take my mind off this now, too, so what else is in the package?


Ah, yes. An index card signed by Preacher Roe. That's all.



Confirmation on the back.

That is pretty cool. I have a baseball card signed by Roe, which will always be my preferred way to own a signature. But still, I can picture someone spotting Preacher Roe in the hallway and looking everywhere for something for him to sign and coming up with just this index card and -- wham!!!! -- a signature from a Boy of Summer.

That's cool.

So that was a package full of a lot of great stuff that raised a few questions with not a lot of answers.

But that's OK.

The reason why I like this hobby -- and the reason why I like writing -- is both are journeys. You don't know where they are going to take you. Many of my posts don't end up where I think they will. So I just enjoy the ride.

I will enjoy this hobby. I will enjoy writing about this hobby whether here or in a printed magazine or both. And I won't spend too much time thinking about any of that.

Comments

Mark Hoyle said…
The E120 American Caramel Set is a beautiful set and one of my favorites. Looks real to me
Bo said…
Maybe Beckett realizes the way to keep subscribers is to hire writers like you.
EP said…
I have a number of E120's, and this one looks real enough. You'd have to have a real one to feel to know for sure.
steelehere said…
Your post reminds me a lot of Grant Brisbee of McCovey Chronicles farewell he wrote the other day. I don’t like the Giants but his writing is incredible. He left to go to a pay site (the Athletic).

https://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2019/1/30/18202403/still-do-not-understand-why-the-site-is-called-mccovey-chronicles-instead-of-mccovey-cove-chronicles

I don’t know if you’ve done so yet but I’d be interested in signing up for a subscription to Beckett Vintage if you can post a promo code or a referral code in order to show that my signing up was a result of reading your blog.
Mark Hoyle said…
I subscribed for a yr so hopefully you get a few articles
gregory said…
The final paragraph of your post really nails it.
Old Cards said…
Like those 65 and 70 cards.
Fuji said…
You and Mario (Wax Heaven) got me to read (and start my very own) blogs. Now that you're writing for Beckett... maybe I'll restart my subscription. Nah. That's not gonna happen. But I will go out and buy the issue that features your next article.

Popular posts from this blog

Cards I'll never buy

I started thinking about the topic of this post even before I saw this image today on the Twitter page of @halocline_gg.

I immediately breathed a sigh of relief upon seeing the photo. This hobby disaster had nothing to do with me.

To run into a sign like this -- if it involved baseball -- would be deflating. And that's why I was relieved that it was targeting a product -- and collectors -- that are so far removed from the way I collect.

Here are the things that I don't care about concerning 2019-2020 Optic Mega Boxes:

1. It's Panini
2. It's basketball
3. It's basketball players on Panini cards.

There are few cards that I know I will never buy, but current basketball cards are definitely in that category.

And here's the exercise: since I have a wide variety of card interests and lots of things that I would buy, I tried to think of cards I would never buy. Ever. Not on a whim. Not on a dare. Never.

I came up with a few. Let's start with the topic du jour:



1. Current b…

Where pages go to die

One thing that I fail to do when trading in this hobby is make the best use of my PWEs and my extra pages.

When sending out a PWE, I usually pack maybe 3 or 4 cards into penny sleeves and fold some paper around it so the cards don't move around and then ship it off.

Meanwhile, people are stuffing up to 12 cards into one-third of a nine-pocket page and shipping it in that same PWE. What's wrong with me?

I don't know, I guess I don't have a lot of extra pages around right now. But that's not the main reason. The main reason is I don't think of it. And when someone sends me one of those cut-up pages, I don't keep them so I can be just as efficient when I send out PWEs.

Yup, those cut-up pages just get chucked. I'm the place where pages go to die.

I've got to stop that. I have a card room and a card desk and a card drawers full of supplies. I love my card drawer full of supplies. All I need to do is add those cut-up pages to the drawers and I'll be…

Eighties

I've been feeling a little guilty lately about neglecting my 1980s card needs.

All of my recent purchases have been related to vintage or Dodgers from the 1990s to the present. The poor '80s have been ignored.

I don't have anything against the '80s, not at all. It's pretty much my favorite decade. While I prefer the '70s for cards and the '90s for god awful situations, the '80s are the overall winner. I continue to live in them when it comes to music, recounting past girlfriends, and the best memories of all-time.

So why don't I gravitate toward the cards from the '80s?

Well, probably mostly because I have so many of them. All the Topps sets are complete. And most of the Dodgers team sets from that time were finished off long ago. My favorites from Donruss and Fleer are done, too.

That leaves the sets that aren't the greatest but do showcase the players that I grew up with, and that's why I'm still trying to complete some Fleer sets…