Skip to main content

Heritage just gets meaner and meaner


So, team collectors, how ya doing with completing that Heritage team set from last year?

Yeah, yeah, I know, you bought the entire team set last March. Probably a smart system when it comes to Heritage.

The checklist for 2019 Heritage was released the other day and before I do anything else, I head right for the short-prints portion of the list. I want to know what kind of aggravation I am facing right up front.

It turns out I'm facing significant unpleasantness. The Dodgers feature a whopping six short-prints in this year's Heritage set. That is one year after the Heritage broke the old record for the most Dodger SPs with five (the Adrian Gonzalez card up top included). So, Heritage has set yet another record, and Heritage is just getting meaner and meaner and more and more difficult to collect.

Consider the various short-print related "innovations" in Heritage when it comes to collecting the Dodgers.

In 2013, Heritage twisted the knife on every team collector by back-loading the stars into the short-print portion of the checklist, which at the time was the final 75 cards in the set. Because that's certainly sticking to the format of 1960s Topps sets, right? What '60s set didn't throw Willie Mays, Roberto Clemente, Don Drysdale, Bob Gibson, Orlando Cepeda, Tony Oliva, Tom Seaver, Mickey Mantle, Willie McCovey and Sandy Koufax into the last series released?

But Heritage hasn't let go of that format, leading to a very unbalanced set for set collectors. Want to see all of the stars? Please turn to page 32 in the binder.

And in fact, Heritage has made collecting it even more difficult. Two years ago, it upped the number of short-prints to 100. Instead of SPs occurring between cards 426-500, they now appear between cards 401-500. More collectors must now chase more short-prints.

To add to the punishment for Dodger fans, the last two years -- when the SPs have been at their peak -- have delivered the most Dodger short-prints, five last year and six this year.

Let's look at the number of Dodger SPs in Heritage since they started putting them at the end of the set in 2008 (coincidentally the first time I started buying Heritage packs):

2008 - 2
2009 - 2
2010 - 0 (yes, ZERO)
2011 - 2
2012 - 3
2013 - 4
2014 - 3
2015 - 4
2016 - 1 (Kershaw)
2017 - 3
2018 - 5
2019 - 6

Lovely.

Have I mentioned that two short-prints from my Dodgers team set from last year's Heritage set -- 426, Rich Hill and 433, Hyun-Jin Ryu -- are still missing from my collection? Now you know why I'm caring less and less about having all the Dodgers.

I refuse to run all over God's green earth for Heritage SPs. Maybe I should order the team set at the start of the year, but even that seems like a hassle. I have so many more desirable card needs right now.

And I can't help but think one of the reasons I feel that way is because of what Heritage has been doing to the collector the last few years, ratcheting up the difficult year by year.

There are those who have argued that the SPs do in fact resemble the challenge that collectors faced back in the '60s. Those SPs represent the dreaded "final series," issued late in the baseball season, when collectors had turned their attention away from baseball and when stores purchased fewer cards from distributors because they knew they couldn't sell them. To this day, those "final series" cards are some of the most difficult-to-find and expensive cards in Topps sets from the 1960s and early 1970s.

And if that's what Heritage is doing with the SPs -- paying tribute to those "final series" -- then, fine, cavalcade of stars aside.

But if that's the case, I'm giving Heritage until 2023 to knock off this nonsense. Because in 1974, Topps decided to issue its entire 660-card set in one shot. Every card was as available as another card and they were available the entire collecting series.

In 2023, Heritage will pay tribute to the 1974 set and I'll be watching.

Of course, now that Heritage has become a set where you can collect mini cards when there weren't mini cards, black borders when there weren't black borders, stupid "flip-stock" variations in which the feel of the backs and fronts are swapped, I'm not expecting the keepers of Heritage to adhere to the Heritage traditions that they once did. Heritage has also scrapped manager cards when there were manager cards, team cards when there were team cards, etc., etc. This isn't your father's Heritage.

So, when Heritage is released and you hear about how it's better than ever, just know:

Heritage is actually meaner than ever.

Comments

Mark Hoyle said…
I don’t feel as bad. Bosox have 4 sp. yes I did buy set presale. .not last March though
My Braves only have 3 SPs this year, down 1 from last year which is complete.
robbyt said…
I have no doubt that the format will remain the same (or likely worse) when 2023 rolls around.
Brian said…
No Joe Mauer in the checklist, so I am sad. I was hoping for one last sunset card.
I don't chase SPs because I don't consider them part of the base set. If there was one or two like early Upper Deck, fine, but 100? No thanks.
BaseSetCalling said…
I am buying just the usual sample pack or two, to see the cards. I want to do the set next year ... but I am already not looking forward to it.

I realized the other day that the 400 base + 100 SP format won't be going away, as Topps prints on 100 card sheets now, I am pretty sure. How they fill out the 100 SP checklist though, is the mean part.

I hope I pull a Pat Palmer, err Lowell Neshek, err, you get the idea. At least he is not a Short Print.
Billy Kingsley said…
I'm not sure what's a worse concept, exclusive licenses or SPs in a base set.
John Bateman said…
This sucks, 2018 Heritage (1969) is the only set where there were no stars short printed (Gonzo, Ryan Braun, Jansen were the only big names. Every other year recently is sp the top players.
jeff hassler said…
im looking to sale my lifelong collection anyone interested call me 4233773769
Night Owl, you need to add a 4th label to this post:

Heritage - meh!
GCA said…
Preach, brother!
Maybe the inserts will make it more enticing...oh wait, they've been exactly the same for twenty years...
Matt said…
I never got into Heritage much specifically because of the short prints. I'm genuinely surprised the Red Sox only have 4SP this year.
Bo said…
Flip-stock variation - I never heard of that one. That's got to be one of the most lame variations ever.
I always enjoy Heritage, but it's become much harder to collect the set over the last few years. It seems like, this year, they've gone for more of a mix between stars and lesser players for the SPs. I'll be interested to see if that balance works out.
Fuji said…
I love Topps, but short printing the star's base card is straight up lame.
carlsonjok said…
Heritage should be right in my wheelhouse, but I hated chasing short prints with a passion. It was what pushed me to be a vintage only collector. Reading this post, I can say I have no regrets.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Selfless card acts

The trouble with the world, if I may be so bold to weigh in (it's not like anyone else is holding back), is that not enough people think outward.

Take a look at just about every world problem that there is, and within each of those individual maelstroms, is somebody, usually a lot of folks, thinking only of themselves.

Looking out for No. 1 is a big, big problem on this earth. One of the biggest. And it's not getting better. I see it coming from all directions and all sides. No one is innocent. Everyone is guilty. Selfishness is the crime.

Our hobby is not immune. That's what makes the baseball card blog community so great, because it's a daily example of what can be achieved when you think of others first, before yourself.

Selflessness is such a staple of card blogs that some collectors have become immune to its charms. "Oh boy, here's another post about what somebody got thanks to the goodness of someone's heart. I don't need to read THAT." I a…