Skip to main content

The dangers of stacking, overstuffing and double-bagging


A few posts ago, I showed some pictures of "the card room" in my home. It's your typical assortment of card stacks, boxes and binders, binders everywhere.

I mentioned in that post that I stack binders on top of each other because I read somewhere that storing binders vertically can warp pages and then warp your cards.

But stacking comes with a cost, especially if you're trying to cut corners.

I have a lot of card interests and consequently a lot of cards. But I don't have the money or the space for all those binders. So I do two things that I know will cause several collectors to shake their heads.

First, I double-bag my pages -- 18 cards per page. I have done this since I first knew there were binders and pages to store cards. I've done this for so long that leaving nine cards to a page to this day seems extravagant. Almost wasteful. The only set that I have not done this for is the 1956 Topps set, because the card backs are so fantastic.

If I were to convert all of my double-bagged pages to 9 cards per page, I would need twice the binders that I have now and I already have about 60 binders. There is no room in the house for 120 binders. I'd have to do a major collection downsize or buy boxes upon boxes. Many tears would be shed.

Secondly, I've been known to overstuff a binder or two. I know this is bad. I know, I know, I know. But conserving cash causes a collector to do some desperate things.

Really, I have just a few sets in overstuffed binders. Complete 2008 and 2009 A&G are in one binder. Complete 2010 and 2011 A&G are in another binder. And a complete 2009 Topps and nearly complete 2009 Topps Chrome are in another binder.

It's disaster waiting to happen.

And it did.

Well, nothing horrible. Just a couple damaged cards.


This is the first page of the 2009 Topps binder. The reverse, "double-bagged" side. The damaged card is the Nate McLouth card in the middle on the right.


It's too difficult to see on the scan but there is an indentation from the center binder ring that runs from the outer middle right edge of the card, all the way through McLouth's arm and almost to the No. 13 on his jersey. It's really pretty ugly.

No other card in this binder has that damage, but there are other overstuffed binders in which a card in the exact same position as the McLouth card has suffered the same damage.


This is card #15 (also McLouth's card number) of the 2010 Allen and Ginter set. You can probably see the indentation leading from the right edge of the card into the zero in Carlos Quentin's uniform number.


This Benji Molina card, which is card #33, also has a binder mark, although not as severe as the Quentin indentation. Molina is on the next page over from McLouth, but also in the same position on a page, right side of the middle row on the reverse side of the page.


Probably the one that bothers me the most is from the 2008 A&G set. This is the only card in that set affected and it's not even on the first page or two of the binder. It's on the reverse side of the fifth page, but the indentation is in the same spot.

This card bothers me the most because '08 A&G is my favorite A&G set. It's such a pristine set on terrific cardboard stock and to see a mark on it is disappointing.

Those are the only cards that I've found that were damaged. But I am planning to find three more binders so I can split up these overstuffed sets. For now, those binders are standing upright, instead of being squashed by a stack, until I can find some cash for binders.

As for all my other sets in binders, they are fine. The rest are all double-bagged, but have just one set to a binder and that seems to eliminate any damage, even stacked on top of each other.

I don't claim to have the best way to store cards. I have limited means and limited space but a big cardboard appetite. So I cut corners and this is what happens sometimes.

I don't plan to change much of how I store my collection. I guess this is just a warning for those who want to stack, overstuff or double-bag. It's probably not a good idea to do all of them at the same time.

Comments

I'm just now in the process of getting some binders/pages for my Rangers collection. I didn't know about storing the binders upright. Thanks for the info.
If you have a Goodwill somewhere nearby go there for binders. I don't know how it is in your area but around here it saves me a ton of money. A good D-ring binder at the evil empire runs around five dollars minimum. I can go to the Goodwill's, and find them for anywhere from 99 cents to $1.99 all the time. I'm picky on the ones I use, but when I find a good one I usually buy it. Getting so bad about it that I have four binders waiting to be used. Just started organizing my collection better today so they will be getting use soon.
BaseSetCalling said…
oh, Carlos Quentin, an ex-Brave and some Giant were the cards just randomly damaged by your binders. uhh-huhhh, sure. No Karma at work there, nope. The question is, what do you have against skateboards?


binders come from yard sales. sometimes, they even have baseball cards in them already I hear, though I haven't ever had that happen.
carlsonjok said…
I am guessing you don't have a cat. Otherwise, you'd be coming home to find that stack of 75 minis all over the floor.
night owl said…
The card room is off limits to pets.
CaptKirk42 said…
One thing that will cut down on the damage from the binder rings is to get the binder inserts that are called "sheet lifters". They are plastic shields that are placed at the front and back of the binder to put your sheets between. The flat ones or the curved ones that cover the entire ring area are the types to get. There is a "boomerang" style which is great for being what they are intended for "lifting the sheets" but that style doesn't protect from ring smushing. Not filling the binder past the intended capacity also helps to avoid that damage. I know it means more and more binders but it helps reduce the overpopulation problems and damage.
Anonymous said…
I've stacked binders vertically for most of the past 30 years. The only time I see curving on the cards is when the binder is near empty and flimsy enough that it bends on its own.

I also tend to go for d-rings with the plastic flap that protects the front sheet because I have crushed cards on the rings.
Ana Lu said…
You should try to get calendars binders. Those are perfect for horizontal cards. I like to seperate vertical from horizontal cards lol

Shame McLouth card is 'hurt' because it's a great card.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Selfless card acts

The trouble with the world, if I may be so bold to weigh in (it's not like anyone else is holding back), is that not enough people think outward.

Take a look at just about every world problem that there is, and within each of those individual maelstroms, is somebody, usually a lot of folks, thinking only of themselves.

Looking out for No. 1 is a big, big problem on this earth. One of the biggest. And it's not getting better. I see it coming from all directions and all sides. No one is innocent. Everyone is guilty. Selfishness is the crime.

Our hobby is not immune. That's what makes the baseball card blog community so great, because it's a daily example of what can be achieved when you think of others first, before yourself.

Selflessness is such a staple of card blogs that some collectors have become immune to its charms. "Oh boy, here's another post about what somebody got thanks to the goodness of someone's heart. I don't need to read THAT." I a…