Skip to main content

It's Fleer's turn


One thing that this exercise has taught me is how differently people perceive the exact same thing. It's a simple piece of cardboard with various shapes, colors and lines. But depending on the collector viewing it, it is either the best piece of cardboard ever devised or a train wreck.

For the first time in this "biggest improvement/biggest bust" series you will see a certain combination on each list TWICE. That's right, according to your comments, people think that 1982-83 Fleer and 1994-95 Fleer is both the biggest improvement and the biggest bust.

I'm tempted to think this is just people trolling or being contrary, but I don't think it is. As my grandma used to say, "that's why there's vodka and beer" (OK, really she said, "that's why there's chocolate and vanilla."). People just like different stuff.

So without further babbling, I will present to you the candidates for selection as Fleer's "Biggest Improvement" and "Biggest Bust." I've altered the sidebar -- something I'm loathe to do -- just so you can vote. So don't let all that effort go to waste. Be a dear, and vote (channeling grandma again).

The candidates:


BIGGEST IMPROVEMENT


1982-83: Here is one of the finalists that appears on both lists. My personal view is that this is not an improvement. I don't like the 1983 gray borders. But there's logic to this. 1982 Fleer had a whole lot of blurry and mis-cropped photos. 1983 didn't have as many. And it had a team logo on the front.



1983-84: You're seeing the divergent opinions already. 1983 Fleer was already an improvement! How can it be improved upon? Davey Lopes wants an answer! Well, if you're asking me, I think there's a lot to improve upon with '83 Fleer. And 1984 Fleer did it. The '84 Fleer set might be my most favorite Fleer set.



1991-92: Pete Incaviglia looks like he's trying to get away from 1991 Fleer. I don't blame him. It's unhealthy to be that close to the sun. I'm not crazy about '92 Fleer, but I understand the sentiment here, too. Anything is an improvement over '91 Fleer.



1993-94: I'm surprised this didn't get a few more votes. Gray/silver borders always suck. ALWAYS. Meanwhile, 1994 Fleer is one of the few understated sets of the '90s. Flashy collectors may not like it, but it has a definite following.



1994-95: You might need therapy if you consider this an improvement. But that's me being judgmental again. Sorry.



1995-96: This received the most nominations. I'm not a big fan of Fleer's matte-finish era, but I think a lot of collectors were happy that Fleer's psychotic era had ended and the company was ready to return to civilized society in 1996.


BIGGEST BUST



1982-83: You just saw this on the "biggest improvement" list. Crazy, huh? I like '82 Fleer better than '83 and remember being disappointed when I pulled those first 1983 Fleer out of packs. But I don't know if I'd call it the biggest bust in the Fleer era.



1987-88: Don't really get this one. I consider both sets to be fairly respectable and better than what Fleer put out in 1985 and 1986. 1987 is kind of cool in a way that '88 Fleer never will be so maybe that was the thought here.



1988-89: I agree. If I could find someone to take all of my 1989 Fleer cards, it would be the best day ever.



1990-91: I've mentioned this before. I didn't buy any Fleer in 1990 (I didn't buy more than a few packs of anything that year). When I was at a card show a couple years later, I saw '90 Fleer for the first time and said, "Ugh. Why would anyone collect that?" Then the following year, I bought packs of '91 Fleer and I find out what "uncollectable" was really about.



1994-95: Far-and-away the most cited example. 1994 is your brain. 1995 is your brain on drugs.

But as we've found out. Some collectors like being on drugs ... sorry, judging again.

So those are your voting options.

The poll is on the sidebar. I'll link to this post so people who don't visit every day (what's wrong with you?) can go to this post and vote at their convenience.

As usual, thanks for playing.

Comments

Jim said…
This one was easy for me . . . I like the 1982 Fleer set, but I loved the 1983 Fleer set. Logo on the front, non-white borders (which was a first for me in my collecting youth) and I loved the little extra picture on the back. If I'm not mistaken, the picture on the back was a first for a mainstream product since the 1971 Topps set.

The 1994 Fleer set is just a gorgeous set - clean fronts, nice photos and a well-planned, color coordinated back. Some of the foil stamping has chipped on my '94 Fleer cards, but I can live with that. When the 1995 Fleer set came out, I honestly thought it was a practical joke. Sadly, it was not.
Paul Hadsall said…
Really easy one for me - the 1995 set is the worst thing Fleer ever produced under their main brand.
Anonymous said…
If you just look at 1994 to 1995 to 1996 it's amazing how they completely changed the brand with each set.
Anonymous said…
I went with 83-84 as the biggest improvement. I think 94 is a good set, very good design. But it didn't QUITE feel like Fleer. Fleer always felt a little different, and 84 felt like Fleer taking that little bit different and making it really cool. I agree 94 was better than 93, but it just didn't really feel like Fleer. It felt like they were trying to copy off 93 Upper Deck but not doing quite as well.

For a similar reason, I didn't go with 94-95 as the biggest bust, though I understand why it's dominating the voting. But I think 88 was a nice set, and 89 is pretty hideous.
JediJeff said…
I am a huge fan of the matte finish Fleer set. I love the idea - it was created to allow ease when having the card autographed.
Rebel Coyote said…
95 Fleer is love and hate. It was experimental but look like a mess. Looks awful on baseball but looked good on basketball and hockey. 95 Fleer HOCKEY is one of my favorite sets but on baseball its a bad mix.
Commishbob said…
I guess I stand with Jim on both counts. I am a fan of the 1983 Fleer set. I liked the gray borders and love that they added the team logo. My Fleer experience only covered about the first six years. The '83 in my favorite.

I can't remember even seeing the '95 set until you put it up on the blog the other day. I thought you were joking at first. Did anyone lose their job over that one?
Fuji said…
Biggest Improvement: 82 to 83
Biggest Bust: 87 to 88
Ana Lu said…
The '81 set is out of the contest because it's simply the best.
GCA said…
Around August I made a '90 Fleer set from a stash a friend had purchased. It was about five 1000 count long boxes already sorted. Wouldn't have spent much getting it otherwise.
I stopped in '84 and started again in '05, so I missed the pain that is '95. Would hate to have to sort that one, either in number or team order.
Always liked the '83s. It's not quite grey to me, but a slightly more exotic pewter or something. They're much more elegant than the surrounding designs.
Stack22 said…
I think '84 to '85 should be the biggest improvement. To me '84 will always be the blue cross/blue shield set and looks like something that should have been given out to kids in hospitals. And I live the gray/color contrast of '85, as well as the backs.

I think '82 to '83 is the biggest drop off.

Popular posts from this blog

This guy was everywhere

It's interesting how athletes from the past are remembered and whether they remain in the public conscious or not.

Hall of Fame players usually survive in baseball conversations long after they've played because they've been immortalized in Cooperstown. Then there are players who didn't reach the Hall but were still very good and somehow, some way, are still remembered.

Players like Dick Allen, Rusty Staub, Vida Blue and Mickey Rivers live on decades later as younger generations pick up on their legacies. Then there are all-stars like Bert Campaneris, who almost never get discussed anymore.

There is just one memory of Campaneris that younger fans most assuredly know. I don't even need to mention it. You know what's coming, even if Lerrin LaGrow didn't.

But there was much more to Campaneris than one momentary loss of reason.

A couple of months ago, when watching old baseball games on youtube hadn't gotten old yet, I was watching a World Series game from…

Some of you have wandered into a giveaway

Thanks to all who voted in the comments for their favorite 1970s Topps card of Bert Campaneris.

I didn't know how this little project would go, since I wasn't installing a poll and, let's face it, the whole theme of the post is how Campaneris these days doesn't get the respect he once did. (Also, I was stunned by the amount of folks who never heard about the bat-throwing moment. Where am I hanging out that I see that mentioned at least every other month?)

A surprising 31 people voted for their favorite Campy and the one with the most votes was the one I saw first, the '75 Topps Campy card above.

The voting totals:

'75 Campy - 11 votes
'70 Campy - 4
'72 Campy - 4
'73 Campy - 4
'76 Campy - 4
'74 Campy - 3
'78 Campy - 1

My thanks to the readers who indulged me with their votes, or even if they didn't vote, their comments on that post. To show my appreciation -- for reading, for commenting, for joining in my card talk even if it might …

Return of the king

(If you haven't voted for your favorite Bert Campaneris '70s card in the last post, I invite you to do so).

So you've been away for a few years and want everyone to know that you're back.

How do you do that?

Do what The Diamond King did when he returned to card blogging last month: Bombard readers with contests and giveaways! Well, you've certainly gotten MY attention, sir!

I'll start with the giveaways first. Since he returned, the Diamond King has issued multiple "Diamond King 9" giveaways, straight out of the chute and rapid fire in the last month-plus. As I've said before, I am very slow to get to these "first come, first serve" giveaways. I used to think "I spend too much time on the computer" and now I realize "I don't spend enough time on the computer at all!"

But I was able to nab two cards out of the many giveaways.


I won this key 1981 Fleer Star Sticker of The Hawk. I have since acquired several more &#…